An approach to vehicle design: In-depth audit to understand the needs of older drivers.

The population of older people continues to increase around the world, and this trend is expected to continue; the population of older drivers is increasing accordingly. January 2012 figures from the DVLA in the UK stated that there were more than 15 million drivers aged over 60; more than 1 million drivers were aged over 80. There is a need for specific research tools to understand and capture how all users interact with features in the vehicle cabin e.g. controls and tasks, including the specific needs of the increasingly older driving population. This paper describes an in-depth audit that was conducted to understand how design of the vehicle cabin impacts on comfort, posture, usability, health and wellbeing in older drivers. The sample involved 47 drivers (38% female, 62% male). The age distribution was: 50-64 (n = 12), 65-79 (n = 20), and those 80 and over (n = 15). The methodology included tools to capture user experience in the vehicle cabin and functional performance tests relevant to specific driving tasks. It is shown that drivers' physical capabilities reduce with age and that there are associated difficulties in setting up an optimal driving position such that some controls cannot be operated as intended, and many adapt their driving cabins. The cabin set-up process consistently began with setting up the seat and finished with operation of the seat belt.

[1]  Lisa J Molnar,et al.  Development and pilot testing of an assessment battery for older drivers. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[2]  G. Yue,et al.  Effects of Aging on Hand Function , 2001, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[3]  Diane E Gyi,et al.  Driving a better driving experience: a questionnaire survey of older compared with younger drivers , 2017, Ergonomics.

[4]  R A Marottoli,et al.  Confidence in, and self-rating of, driving ability among older drivers. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Diane E. Gyi,et al.  Exploring the optimum posture for driver comfort , 2014 .

[6]  Naoki Ikegami,et al.  Population ageing and wellbeing: lessons from Japan's long-term care insurance policy , 2011, The Lancet.

[7]  Andrew Morris,et al.  Situation Awareness: its proficiency amongst older and younger drivers, and its usefulness for perceiving hazards , 2018 .

[8]  Ian Shergold,et al.  Examining the process of driving cessation in later life , 2013, European journal of ageing.

[9]  Helen Middleton,et al.  Assessment and decision criteria for driving competence in the elderly , 2004 .

[10]  Pamela McCauley-Bush,et al.  Ergonomics: Foundational Principles, Applications, and Technologies , 2011 .

[11]  Vivek Bhise,et al.  Ergonomics in the Automotive Design Process , 2011 .

[12]  Neil Mansfield,et al.  Computerised link analysis , 2009 .

[13]  Nikolaos Gkikas Ergonomics Issues with Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) , 2016 .

[14]  D B Elliott,et al.  The reliability of the Pelli‐Robson contrast sensitivity chart , 1990, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[15]  R B Isler,et al.  Age related effects of restricted head movements on the useful field of view of drivers. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Nikolaos Gkikas Driving Posture and Healthy Design , 2016 .

[17]  Karali Sukru,et al.  Driving a better driving experience: A questionnaire survey of older compared with younger car users - dataset , 2016 .

[18]  Elizabeth A. Tully,et al.  Video analysis of sagittal spinal posture in healthy young and older adults. , 2009, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[19]  S. Haymes,et al.  Reliability and Validity of the Melbourne Edge Test and High/Low Contrast Visual Acuity Chart , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[20]  Alex Attridge,et al.  User-centred design and evaluation of automotive seat adjustment controls , 2011 .

[21]  Christine M. Haslegrave,et al.  Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Ergonomics and the Design of Work, Third Edition , 2016 .

[22]  Maury A. Nussbaum,et al.  Assessment of Aging Effects on Drivers' Perceptual and Behavioral Responses Using Subjective Ratings and Pressure Measures , 2010 .

[23]  Gayla M. Cissell,et al.  Can High‐Risk Older Drivers Be Identified Through Performance‐Based Measures in a Department of Motor Vehicles Setting? , 2006, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[24]  Paul Herriotts,et al.  Identification of vehicle design requirements for older drivers. , 2005, Applied ergonomics.

[25]  Karl H.E. Kroemer,et al.  Ergonomics: How to Design for Ease and Efficiency , 1993 .

[26]  M Mäntyjärvi,et al.  Normal values for the Pelli‐Robson contrast sensitivity test , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[27]  Stephen J. Guastello,et al.  Human Factors Engineering and Ergonomics: A Systems Approach , 2006 .

[28]  Najmedin Meshkati,et al.  THE OLDER DRIVER AND PASSENGER. , 1993 .

[29]  Arun Garg,et al.  Dexterity as measured with the 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) across the age span. , 2015, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[30]  Clark C. Presson,et al.  Normative and Validation Studies of the Nine-Hole Peg Test with Children , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[31]  Christine M. Haslegrave,et al.  Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Ergonomics And The Design Of Work , 1986 .

[32]  Carolyn A. Unsworth,et al.  Review of tests contributing to the occupational therapy off-road driver assessment , 2005 .