How to carry out a literature search for a systematic review: A practical guide

Performing an effective literature search to obtain the best available evidence is the basis of any evidence-based discipline, in particular evidence-based medicine. However, with a vast and growing volume of published research available, searching the literature can be challenging. Even when journals are indexed in electronic databases, it can be difficult to identify all relevant studies without an effective search strategy. It is also important to search unpublished literature to reduce publication bias, which occurs from a tendency for authors and journals to preferentially publish statistically significant studies. This article is intended for clinicians and researchers who are approaching the field of evidence synthesis and would like to perform a literature search. It aims to provide advice on how to develop the search protocol and the strategy to identify the most relevant evidence for a given research or clinical question. It will also focus on how to search not only the published but also the unpublished literature using a number of online resources. LEARNING OBJECTIVES • Understand the purpose of conducting a literature search and its integral part of the literature review process • Become aware of the range of sources that are available, including electronic databases of published data and trial registries to identify unpublished data • Understand how to develop a search strategy and apply appropriate search terms to interrogate electronic databases or trial registries DECLARATION OF INTEREST None.

[1]  C. Braunschweig,et al.  Demystifying the Search Button , 2015, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[2]  T. Dinan,et al.  A review of ketamine in affective disorders: current evidence of clinical efficacy, limitations of use and pre-clinical evidence on proposed mechanisms of action. , 2014, Journal of affective disorders.

[3]  Lucy Bell,et al.  How CLIP became ECLIPSE: a mnemonic to assist in searching for health policy/ management information. , 2002, Health information and libraries journal.

[4]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement , 2009, BMJ.

[5]  Peter Fonagy,et al.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data , 2004, The Lancet.

[6]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2013 .

[7]  E. von Elm,et al.  Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[8]  Paul J. Harrison,et al.  A systematic review of calcium channel antagonists in bipolar disorder and some considerations for their future development , 2016, Molecular Psychiatry.

[9]  D L Sackett,et al.  Evidence-based medicine. , 1997, Seminars in perinatology.

[10]  Steve McDonald,et al.  Development of the Cochrane Collaboration’s Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials , 2002, Evaluation & the health professions.

[11]  Andrea Cipriani,et al.  Hydroxyzine for generalised anxiety disorder. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[12]  W. Richardson,et al.  The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. , 1995, ACP journal club.

[13]  Dean Giustini,et al.  Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study , 2016, Systematic Reviews.

[14]  M. Clarke,et al.  Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials. , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Publication Bias: The Problem That Won't Go Away , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Karen Sue,et al.  Formulating the Evidence Based Practice Question: A Review of the Frameworks , 2011 .

[17]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  V. Alberani,et al.  The use of grey literature in health sciences: a preliminary survey. , 1990, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[19]  T. Furukawa,et al.  Ketamine and other glutamate receptor modulators for depression in adults , 2015, BJPsych Advances.

[20]  P. Cuijpers,et al.  Comparative efficacy and tolerability of antidepressants for major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis , 2016, The Lancet.

[21]  F. Song,et al.  Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. , 2010, Health technology assessment.

[22]  M. Dorgan,et al.  Identifying clinical trials in the medical literature with electronic databases: MEDLINE alone is not enough. , 2000, Controlled clinical trials.

[23]  T. Furukawa,et al.  Quality and impact of secondary information in promoting evidence-based clinical practice: a cross-sectional study about EBMH , 2016, Evidence-Based Mental Health.

[24]  Andrew Booth,et al.  Clear and present questions: formulating questions for evidence based practice , 2006, Libr. Hi Tech.

[25]  Neal R Haddaway,et al.  The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching , 2015, PloS one.