When the audience talks back: MOOCs and "super" discourse

Opportunities for co-produced digital media find users differentially involved within emergent and unfamiliar configurations of technologies, organizations, and complex information flows. Addressing the interaction patterns and rhetorical practices of the most frequent contributors to online discussion forums in comparison to the majority of infrequent contributors, this analysis considers the contributions of each toward the structuring of online discourse. An empirical analysis found an inverse ratio between the monologues and replies of frequent contributors and those users posting a single comment. Although both groups tended to engage in interpretive practices, frequent contributors more often interacted in direct reply with others, often in sharp critique or supportive acknowledgement. These findings suggest that frequent contributors perform a significant role in the emergent structuring of online discourse.

[1]  Edward Comor.  Contextualizing and Critiquing the Fantastic Prosumer: Power, Alienation and Hegemony , 2011 .

[2]  Todd Graham,et al.  Discursive Equality and Everyday Talk Online: The Impact of "Superparticipants" , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  Jungwoo Kim,et al.  The politics of comments: predicting political orientation of news stories with commenters' sentiment patterns , 2011, CSCW.

[4]  David A. Huffaker,et al.  Dimensions of leadership and social influence in online communities , 2010 .

[5]  Christian Fuchs,et al.  A Contribution to the Critique of the Political Economy of Transnational Informational Capitalism , 2009 .

[6]  Gary Burnett,et al.  Information Exchange in Virtual Communities: A Comparative Study , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[7]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Enacting language games: the development of a sense of ‘we‐ness’ in online forums , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[8]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments , 2014 .

[9]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[10]  Henrik Örnebring,et al.  USER-GENERATED CONTENT AND THE NEWS , 2011 .

[11]  J. Law.  Actor-network theory and material semiotics , 2009 .

[12]  David H. Wolpert,et al.  Collective Intelligence , 1999 .

[13]  Y. Benkler,et al.  The Wealth of Networks , 2008 .

[14]  Sujin Choi,et al.  The Two-Step Flow of Communication in Twitter-Based Public Forums , 2015 .

[15]  Antonio Gramsci.  Selections from the prison notebooks , 2020, The Applied Theatre Reader.

[16]  M. Castells.  Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1996 .

[17]  Lucy Küng,et al.  Digitizing the News: Innovation in Online Newspapers , 2005 .

[18]  Isa Jahnke,et al.  Dynamics of social roles in a knowledge management community , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Achim Schmitt,et al.  A journey through communities of practice: How and why members move from the periphery to the core , 2011 .

[20]  Lincoln Dahlberg.  The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring The Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere , 2001 .

[21]  Philip Barker,et al.  Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From Production to Produsage , 2009 .

[22]  M. Poster,et al.  What's the Matter with the Internet? , 2001 .

[23]  Hai Liang,et al.  The Organizational Principles of Online Political Discussion: A Relational Event Stream Model for Analysis of Web Forum Deliberation , 2014 .

[24]  Simon Lindgren,et al.  YouTube gunmen? Mapping participatory media discourse on school shooting videos , 2011 .

[25]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Performing catharsis: The use of online discussion forums in organizational change , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[26]  Danyel Fisher,et al.  Friends, foes, and fringe: norms and structure in political discussion networks , 2006, DG.O.

[27]  Itai Himelboim,et al.  Political Discourse : The Network Structure of Unrestricted Discussions , 2010 .

[28]  Lily Canter,et al.  THE MISCONCEPTION OF ONLINE COMMENT THREADS , 2013 .

[29]  Karen Barad.  Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter , 2003, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[30]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[31]  Abel Duarte Alonso,et al.  Moderating virtual sport consumer forums: exploring the role of the volunteer moderator , 2012, Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organisations.

[32]  Vincent Baujard,et al.  A qualitative analysis of an internet discussion forum for recent ex-smokers. , 2006, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[33]  Jane B. Singer,et al.  Separate Spaces , 2009 .

[34]  S. Albrecht.  Whose voice is heard in online deliberation?: A study of participation and representation in political debates on the internet , 2006 .

[35]  Jo Guldi,et al.  Let's Look at the Evidence , 2014 .

[36]  A. Pentland,et al.  Collective intelligence , 2006, IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag..

[37]  L. Terveen,et al.  Becoming Wikipedian : Transformation of Participation in a Collaborative Online Encyclopedia , 2009 .

[38]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Sociotechnical Approaches to the Study of Information Systems , 2014, Computing Handbook, 3rd ed..

[39]  Itai Himelboim,et al.  Reply distribution in online discussions: A comparative network analysis of political and health newsgroups , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[40]  Wendell Bell,et al.  The Third Wave. , 1982 .