Extracting leanness criteria by employing the concept of Balanced Scorecard

For investigating the leanness criteria, a set of logical procedures for auto part manufacturing organizations have been developed in this paper. Of the common methodology to determine the production/service performance criteria is to consider and develop the performance measurement systems (PMS) to some extent. Reviewing the state-of-the arts, various systems & approaches used for measuring performance has been studied in which the concept of Balanced Scorecard (BSC) approach was selected in this study. In this paper the concept of BSC approach has been developed for selecting the leanness criteria. For determining the lean performance measurement through the company's lean strategy map, a set of objectives should be driven based on the BSC concept. To determine the company's lean strategy map, the DEMATEL approach has been used to identify the cause and effect relationships among objectives as well as their priorities. This study may serve as a reference point for auto part manufacturing companies to identify their production weaknesses, and help them to focus on their improvement based on their most important and suitable selected objectives and criteria.

[1]  Imad Alsyouf,et al.  Measuring maintenance performance using a balanced scorecard approach : Methodology and Theory , 2006 .

[2]  Pär Åhlström,et al.  Assessing changes towards lean production , 1996 .

[3]  Aditya Parida,et al.  Development of a multi‐criteria hierarchical framework for maintenance performance measurement (MPM) , 2007 .

[4]  Daniel Roos,et al.  The machine that changed the world : the story of lean production , 1991 .

[5]  A. Sánchez,et al.  Lean indicators and manufacturing strategies , 2001 .

[6]  James P. Womack,et al.  Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation , 1996 .

[7]  John S. Oakland,et al.  Total Quality Management: The Route to Improving Performance , 1993 .

[8]  Stefan Tangen,et al.  Evaluation and revision of performance measurement systems , 2004 .

[9]  大野 耐一,et al.  Toyota production system : beyond large-scale production , 1988 .

[10]  Paul R. Niven,et al.  Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results , 2002 .

[11]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  The Toyota Production System , 1984 .

[12]  James S. Noble,et al.  The changing basis of performance measurement , 1996 .

[13]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The strategy-focused organization , 2000 .

[14]  J Bowe,et al.  Total quality management. , 1992, Contemporary longterm care.

[15]  A. Neely,et al.  WHY MEASUREMENT INITIATIVES FAIL , 2000 .

[16]  Roberto Panizzolo,et al.  Applying the lessons learned from 27 lean manufacturers.: The relevance of relationships management , 1998 .

[17]  S. M. Seyed Hosseini,et al.  Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Rosemary R. Fullerton,et al.  Lean Manufacturing, Non-Financial Performance Measures, and Financial Performance , 2009 .

[19]  Wei-Wen Wu,et al.  Developing global managers' competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Wei-Wen Wu,et al.  Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Toyota Production System , 1993 .

[22]  A. Neely The performance measurement revolution: why now and what next? , 1999 .

[23]  Rajat Bhagwat,et al.  Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach , 2007, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[24]  Yueh-Ling Hsu,et al.  Structuring Critical Success Factors of Airline Safety Management System Using a Hybrid Model , 2010 .

[25]  Mustafa Yurdakul,et al.  Measuring a manufacturing system’s performance using Saaty’s system with feedback approach , 2002 .

[26]  Nils-Göran Olve,et al.  Performance Drivers: A Practical Guide to Using the Balanced Scorecard , 1999 .