Cyber-Physical Systems Integration in a Production Line Simulator

Digital Twin represents a simulated model of a production line which allows making analyses of future states concerning the real factory. More in details, these analyses are related to the variability of production quality, prediction of the maintenance cycle, the accurate estimation of energy consumption and other extra-functional properties of the system. This is the core of what is so called Industry 4.0. Every single node of the manufacturing process needs to be modelled as a Cyber-physical system to be able to make the mentioned analyses. However, Manufacturing simulators represent these systems with a high level of abstraction, making impossible precise analyses. In the state of the art, some solutions try to solve the problem connecting multiple domain-specific simulators, to preserve details but requiring complex co-simulation environments. This paper presents a methodology for the integration of Cyber-Physical Systems in production line simulators, avoiding these issues. The proposed solution is based on a new promising technology: the Function Mockup Interface (FMI). This standard defines an interface to exports models as blocks called Functional Mockup Units (FMUs). These FMUs can be easily integrated together composing heterogeneous systems. The methodology is composed of two steps: 1) Exporting Digital and Physical systems as different FMUs 2) Integration of the FMUs into a production line simulator. An example is used to validate our solution which clearly shows the limitations of the production line simulator without the integration of CPSs. This paper aims at producing Cyber-Physical Production Systems (CPPS) to make more accurate simulations, and hence more accurate analysis of the production line.

[1]  Ján Vachálek,et al.  The digital twin of an industrial production line within the industry 4.0 concept , 2017, 2017 21st International Conference on Process Control (PC).

[2]  Dimitris Mourtzis,et al.  Simulation in Manufacturing: Review and Challenges , 2014 .

[3]  Andreas Gerstlauer,et al.  SimConnect and SimTalk for distributed cyber-physical system simulation , 2013, Simul..

[4]  Franco Fummi,et al.  Code Manipulation for Virtual Platform Integration , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[5]  Franco Fummi,et al.  HIFSuite: Tools for HDL Code Conversion and Manipulation , 2010, 2010 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop (HLDVT).

[6]  Rainer Drath,et al.  Industrie 4.0: Hit or Hype? [Industry Forum] , 2014, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[7]  Franco Fummi,et al.  Automatic integration of cycle-accurate descriptions with continuous-time models for cyber-physical virtual platforms , 2018, 2018 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE).

[8]  Adrian Pop,et al.  OpenModelica - A free open-source environment for system modeling, simulation, and teaching , 2006, 2006 IEEE Conference on Computer Aided Control System Design, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control.

[9]  Franco Fummi,et al.  Automatic generation of cycle-accurate Simulink blocks from hdl ips , 2017, 2017 Forum on Specification and Design Languages (FDL).

[10]  Andreas Junghanns,et al.  Functional Mockup Interface 2.0: The Standard for Tool independent Exchange of Simulation Models , 2012 .

[11]  Pieter J. Mosterman,et al.  Industry 4.0 as a Cyber-Physical System study , 2016, Software & Systems Modeling.

[12]  Sigrid Wenzel,et al.  Coupled Simulation of Energy and Material Flow using Plant Simulation and MATLAB Simulink , 2017, Simul. Notes Eur..