Throughflow centrality is a global indicator of the functional importance of species in ecosystems
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. J. Lotka. Contribution to the Energetics of Evolution. , 1922, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[2] W. Leontief. Studies in the Structure of the American Economy: Theoretical and Empirical Explorations in Input-Output Analysis , 1953 .
[3] E. Odum. Fundamentals of Ecology. , 1955 .
[4] Wassily Leontief,et al. The Structure of the U.S. Economy , 1965 .
[5] R. H. Whittaker,et al. Dominance and Diversity in Land Plant Communities , 1965, Science.
[6] Charles H. Hubbell. An Input-Output Approach to Clique Identification , 1965 .
[7] R. Paine. Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.
[8] Wassily Leontief. Input-Output Economics , 1966 .
[9] E. Odum. The strategy of ecosystem development. , 1969, Science.
[10] B. Parker,et al. Proceedings of the Colloquium on Conservation Problems in Antarctica, held on 10-12 September, 1971, Blacksburg, Virginia , 1972 .
[11] P. Bonacich. Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification , 1972 .
[12] H. Rittel,et al. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .
[13] B. Hannon,et al. The structure of ecosystems. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.
[14] J. Finn,et al. Measures of ecosystem structure and function derived from analysis of flows. , 1976, Journal of theoretical biology.
[15] Robert W. Bosserman,et al. 17 – Propagation of Cause in Ecosystems , 1976 .
[16] L. Freeman. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .
[17] B. C. Patten,et al. Systems Analysis and Simulation in Ecology , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
[18] Sven Erik Jørgensen,et al. A holistic approach to ecological modelling , 1979 .
[19] Patrick L. Odell,et al. Chapter 2 – CONCERNING AGGREGATION IN ECOSYSTEM MODELING , 1979 .
[20] John T. Finn,et al. Flow analysis of models of the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem. , 1980 .
[21] John H. Lawton,et al. ARE FOOD WEBS DIVIDED INTO COMPARTMENTS , 1980 .
[22] H. Milne,et al. Energy flow in the Ythan Estuary, Aberdeenshire, Scotland , 1981 .
[23] Thomas B. Starr,et al. Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity , 1982 .
[24] Robert V. O'Neill,et al. Robust Analysis of Aggregation Error , 1982 .
[25] P. Bonacich. Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.
[26] Janusz Szyrmer,et al. Total flows in ecosystems , 1987 .
[27] H. Odum,et al. Self-Organization, Transformity, and Information , 1988, Science.
[28] R. Ulanowicz. Growth and development : ecosystems phenomenology , 1988 .
[29] R. Ulanowicz,et al. The Seasonal Dynamics of The Chesapeake Bay Ecosystem , 1989 .
[30] Noah E. Friedkin,et al. Theoretical Foundations for Centrality Measures , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.
[31] Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al. The Comparative Ecology of Six Marine Ecosystems , 1991 .
[32] L. Freeman,et al. Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow , 1991 .
[33] Raymond L. Lindeman. The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology , 1942 .
[34] B. Walker. Biodiversity and Ecological Redundancy , 1992 .
[35] H. Ibarra. NETWORK CENTRALITY, POWER, AND INNOVATION INVOLVEMENT: DETERMINANTS OF TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ROLES , 1993 .
[36] D. Doak,et al. The Keystone-Species Concept in Ecology and ConservationManagement and policy must explicitly consider the complexity of interactions in natural systems , 1993 .
[37] John H. Lawton,et al. What Do Species Do in Ecosystems , 1994 .
[38] E. D. Schneider,et al. Life as a manifestation of the second law of thermodynamics , 1994 .
[39] J. Lawton,et al. Organisms as ecosystem engineers , 1994 .
[40] Bernard C. Patten,et al. Network integration of ecological extremal principles: exergy, emergy, power, ascendency, and indirect effects , 1995 .
[41] J. Castilla,et al. Challenges in the Quest for Keystones , 1996 .
[42] R. Ulanowicz. Ecology, the ascendent perspective , 1997 .
[43] Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al. Comparative ecosystem trophic structure of three U.S. mid-Atlantic estuaries , 1997 .
[44] D. Baird,et al. Assessment of spatial and temporal variability in ecosystem attributes of the St Marks national wildlife refuge, Apalachee bay, Florida , 1998 .
[45] Felix Müller,et al. Eco Targets, Goal Functions, and Orientors , 1998 .
[46] B. C. Patten,et al. Review of the Foundations of Network Environ Analysis , 1999, Ecosystems.
[47] Brian D. Fath,et al. Quantifying resource homogenization using network flow analysis , 1999 .
[48] Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al. Benthic-pelagic switching in a coastal subtropical lagoon , 1999 .
[49] D. Eggleston,et al. Computer simulations of wind-induced Estuarine circulation patterns and estuary-shelf exchange processes : The potential role of wind forcing on larval transport , 1999 .
[50] Sven Erik Jørgensen,et al. Ecosystems emerging: 3. Openness , 1999 .
[51] Johanna J. Heymans,et al. A carbon flow model and network analysis of the northern Benguela upwelling system, Namibia , 2000 .
[52] R. Elmgren,et al. Carbon flows in Baltic Sea food webs — a re-evaluation using a mass balance approach , 2000 .
[53] B. C. Patten,et al. Ecosystems emerging:: 4. growth , 2000 .
[54] Britta Ruhnau,et al. Eigenvector-centrality - a node-centrality? , 2000, Soc. Networks.
[55] B. C. Patten,et al. Complementarity of ecological goal functions. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.
[56] W. Reed. The Pareto, Zipf and other power laws , 2001 .
[57] H. Caswell. Matrix population models : construction, analysis, and interpretation , 2001 .
[58] Virginia H. Dale,et al. Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators , 2001 .
[59] Johanna J. Heymans,et al. Network analysis of the South Florida Everglades graminoid marshes and comparison with nearby cypress ecosystems , 2002 .
[60] Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al. The effects of taxonomic aggregation on network analysis , 2002 .
[61] Cristina Bondavalli,et al. Towards a sustainable use of water resources: a whole-ecosystem approach using network analysis , 2002 .
[62] Albert-László Barabási,et al. Linked: The New Science of Networks , 2002 .
[63] C. S. Holling,et al. Panarchy Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2002 .
[64] M. C. Newman,et al. Fundamentals of Ecotoxicology, Second Edition , 2002 .
[65] D. Mason,et al. Compartments revealed in food-web structure , 2003, Nature.
[66] R. Solé. Linked: The New Science of Networks.ByAlbert‐László Barabási.Cambridge (Massachusetts): Perseus Publishing.$26.00. vii + 280 p; ill.; index. ISBN: 0–7382–0667–9. 2002. , 2003 .
[67] Stefano Allesina,et al. Steady state of ecosystem flow networks: a comparison between balancing procedures , 2003 .
[68] Stefan Richter,et al. Centrality Indices , 2004, Network Analysis.
[69] Janet K. Allen,et al. Applying Ecological Input‐Output Flow Analysis to Material Flows in Industrial Systems: Part I: Tracing Flows , 2004 .
[70] Janet K. Allen,et al. Applying Ecological Input‐Output Flow Analysis to Material Flows in Industrial Systems: Part II: Flow Metrics , 2004 .
[71] Robert R. Christian,et al. CONSEQUENCES OF HYPOXIA ON ESTUARINE ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION: ENERGY DIVERSION FROM CONSUMERS TO MICROBES , 2004 .
[72] Santosh S. Vempala,et al. Flow metrics , 2004, Theor. Comput. Sci..
[73] D. Baird,et al. Energy flow of a boreal intertidal ecosystem, the Sylt-Rømø Bight , 2004 .
[74] F. Jordán,et al. Characterizing the importance of habitat patches and corridors in maintaining the landscape connectivity of a Pholidoptera transsylvanica (Orthoptera) metapopulation , 2003, Landscape Ecology.
[75] F. Chapin,et al. EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .
[76] U. M. Scharler,et al. The consequences of the aggregation of detritus pools in ecological networks , 2005 .
[77] S. Allesina,et al. Ecological subsystems via graph theory: the role of strongly connected components , 2005 .
[78] Stephen P. Borgatti,et al. Centrality and network flow , 2005, Soc. Networks.
[79] Julia L. Blanchard,et al. Aggregation and removal of weak-links in food-web models: system stability and recovery from disturbance , 2005 .
[80] Matthew W. Hahn,et al. Comparative genomics of centrality and essentiality in three eukaryotic protein-interaction networks. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[81] J. Webster,et al. Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems , 2005 .
[82] S. Suh,et al. Industrial ecology and input-output economics: an introduction , 2005 .
[83] D. Baird,et al. A comparison of selected ecosystem attributes of three South African estuaries with different freshwater inflow regimes, using network analysis , 2005 .
[84] Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al. Role of network analysis in comparative ecosystem ecology of estuaries , 2005 .
[85] M. Newman,et al. Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[86] Brian D. Fath,et al. A MATLABreg function for Network Environ Analysis , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..
[87] Martin G. Everett,et al. A Graph-theoretic perspective on centrality , 2006, Soc. Networks.
[88] Ferenc Jordán,et al. Topological keystone species : measures of positional importance in food webs , 2006 .
[89] Fundamental Processes in Ecology: An Earth Systems Approach , 2006 .
[90] Brian D Fath,et al. Functional integration of ecological networks through pathway proliferation. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.
[91] Stuart R. Borrett,et al. Indirect effects and distributed control in ecosystems: Comparative network environ analysis of a seven-compartment model of nitrogen flow in the Neuse River estuary, USA—Time series analysis , 2007 .
[92] Sven E. Jørgensen,et al. A New Ecology: Systems Perspective , 2007 .
[93] Ferenc Jordán,et al. Weighting, scale dependence and indirect effects in ecological networks: A comparative study , 2007 .
[94] Bruce Hannon,et al. Ecological network analysis : network construction , 2007 .
[95] Stanley Wasserman,et al. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.
[96] F. Jordán,et al. Quantifying positional importance in food webs: A comparison of centrality indices , 2007 .
[97] Stuart R. Borrett,et al. Indirect effects and distributed control in ecosystems: Distributed control in the environ networks of a seven-compartment model of nitrogen flow in the Neuse River Estuary, USA—Time series analysis , 2007 .
[98] J. Link,et al. The Northeast U.S. continental shelf Energy Modeling and Analysis exercise (EMAX): Ecological network model development and basic ecosystem metrics , 2008 .
[99] Ernesto Estrada,et al. Using network centrality measures to manage landscape connectivity. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.
[100] Cynthia M. Lakon,et al. How Correlated Are Network Centrality Measures? , 2008, Connections.
[101] Santanu Ray,et al. Comparative study of virgin and reclaimed islands of Sundarban mangrove ecosystem through network analysis , 2008 .
[102] D. Mason,et al. Invasive species impacts on ecosystem structure and function: A comparison of the Bay of Quinte, Canada, and Oneida Lake, USA, before and after zebra mussel invasion , 2009 .
[103] B. Walsh,et al. Abundant Genetic Variation + Strong Selection = Multivariate Genetic Constraints: A Geometric View of Adaptation , 2009 .
[104] D. Mason,et al. Invasive species impacts on ecosystem structure and function: A comparison of Oneida Lake, New York, USA, before and after zebra mussel invasion , 2009 .
[105] Stefano Allesina,et al. Googling Food Webs: Can an Eigenvector Measure Species' Importance for Coextinctions? , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[106] B. C. Patten,et al. Rapid development of indirect effects in ecological networks , 2010 .
[107] R. D. Groot,et al. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making , 2010 .
[108] Yan Zhang,et al. Ecological network analysis of an urban water metabolic system: model development, and a case study for Beijing. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.
[109] Jens M. Olesen,et al. Centrality measures and the importance of generalist species in pollination networks , 2010 .
[110] Ernesto Estrada. Generalized walks-based centrality measures for complex biological networks. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.
[111] Ulrik Brandes,et al. Network Analysis: Methodological Foundations , 2010 .
[112] Ferenc Jordán,et al. Node centrality indices in food webs: Rank orders versus distributions , 2010 .
[113] P. Guimarães,et al. What makes a species central in a cleaning mutualism network , 2010 .
[114] Andria K. Salas,et al. Evidence for resource homogenization in 50 trophic ecosystem networks , 2010, 1104.0021.
[115] Santiago Saura,et al. Ranking individual habitat patches as connectivity providers: Integrating network analysis and patch removal experiments , 2010 .
[116] Sebastián Urrutia,et al. Organising metabolic networks: Cycles in flux distributions. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.
[117] H. Odum,et al. TIME'S SPEED REGULATOR: THE OPTIMUM EFFICIENCY FOR MAXIMUM POWER OUTPUT IN PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2011 .
[118] C. Kennedy,et al. The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. , 2011, Environmental pollution.
[119] Pedro Jordano,et al. Evolution and Coevolution in Mutualistic Networks , 2022 .
[120] Stuart R. Borrett,et al. Evidence for the dominance of indirect effects in 50 trophic ecosystem networks , 2010, 1009.1841.
[121] S. Borrett,et al. Reconnecting environs to their environment , 2011 .
[122] Ferenc Jordán,et al. Contribution of habitat patches to network connectivity: Redundancy and uniqueness of topological indices , 2011 .
[123] Alan J. Butler,et al. From Populations to Ecosystems: Theoretical Foundations for a New Ecological Synthesis , 2011 .
[124] Serguei Saavedra,et al. Strong contributors to network persistence are the most vulnerable to extinction , 2011, Nature.
[125] John R. Schramski,et al. Network environ theory, simulation, and EcoNet® 2.0 , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..
[126] S. Borrett,et al. Environ centrality reveals the tendency of indirect effects to homogenize the functional importance of species in ecosystems. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.
[127] Yan Zhang,et al. Ecological network analysis of China's societal metabolism. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.
[128] David E. Hines,et al. A network model shows the importance of coupled processes in the microbial N cycle in the Cape Fear River Estuary , 2012 .
[129] F. Müller,et al. The indicator side of ecosystem services , 2012 .
[130] Andrew D Higginson,et al. Heavy use of equations impedes communication among biologists , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[131] Edwin Zondervan,et al. Methodology for Assessment and Optimization of Industrial Eco-Systems , 2012 .
[132] Bin Chen,et al. Network environ perspective for urban metabolism and carbon emissions: a case study of Vienna, Austria. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.
[133] Brian D. Fath,et al. Dependence of network metrics on model aggregation and throughflow calculations: Demonstration using the Sylt–Rømø Bight Ecosystem , 2013 .
[134] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .