Secure multiobjective real and reactive power allocation of thermal power units

Abstract This paper presents best weight pattern evaluation approach to solve multiobjective load dispatch (MOLD) problem which determines the allocation of power demand among the committed generating units, to minimize a number of objectives. Operating cost, minimal impacts on environment, active power loss, are the objectives undertaken to be minimized subject to physical and technological constraints. MOLD problem is decomposed in two stages and is solved sequentially. In first stage, a optimization problem having multiple objectives which are function of only active power generation like operating cost, gaseous pollutant emissions, is solved to get optimal dispatch of active power generation, subject to meet the active power demand, generators’ capacity constraint and transmission active power line flow limits. In second stage, the system real power loss which is a function of reactive power generation is minimized, to get optimal reactive power generation, subject to meet reactive power demand, reactive power generators’ capacity constraint and transmission reactive power line flow limits, when active power generation is known in prior from first stage. The validity of the proposed method is demonstrated on 11-bus, 17-lines and 30-bus, 41-lines IEEE power systems.

[1]  G. Mavrotas,et al.  Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method , 1995, Comput. Oper. Res..

[2]  Jaspreet Singh Dhillon,et al.  Multiobjective load dispatch by fuzzy logic based searching weightage pattern , 2002 .

[3]  F. B. Chaaban,et al.  Options for emissions reduction from power plants: an economic evaluation , 2004 .

[4]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Synchronous approach in interactive multiobjective optimization , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .

[6]  T. Jayabarathi,et al.  Evolutionary programming techniques for different kinds of economic dispatch problems , 2005 .

[7]  T. Niimura,et al.  Multiobjective tradeoff analysis of deregulated electricity transactions , 2003 .

[8]  Chao-Ming Huang,et al.  A novel approach to real-time economic emission power dispatch , 2003 .

[9]  D. P. Kothari,et al.  The surrogate worth trade-off approach for multiobjective thermal power dispatch problem , 2000 .

[10]  Wai-yu. Ng Generalized Generation Distribution Factors for Power System Security Evaluations , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[11]  G. Sheblé,et al.  Power generation operation and control — 2nd edition , 1996 .

[12]  Chin E. Lin,et al.  A two-step sensitivity approach for real-time line flow calculation , 1991 .

[13]  C.A. Castro,et al.  Real power losses reduction and loading margin improvement via continuation method , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  P. Somasundaram,et al.  Application of evolutionary programming to security constrained economic dispatch , 2005 .

[15]  Mohammad Ali Abido,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for electric power dispatch problem , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[16]  Narayana Prasad Padhy,et al.  Comparison and application of evolutionary programming techniques to combined economic emission dispatch with line flow constraints , 2003 .

[17]  Jaspreet Singh Dhillon,et al.  Fuzzy Satisfying Multiobjective Thermal Power Dispatch Based on Surrogate Worth Trade-off Method , 2007 .