Ecological analysis of world trade

Ecological systems have a high level of complexity combined with stability and rich biodiversity. Recently, the analysis of their properties and evolution has been pushed forward on a basis of concept of mutualistic networks that provides a detailed understanding of their features being linked to a high nestedness of these networks. It was shown that the nestedness architecture of mutualistic networks of plants and their pollinators minimizes competition and increases biodiversity. Here, using the United Nations COMTRADE database for years 1962 - 2009, we show that a similar ecological analysis gives a valuable description of the world trade. In fact the countries and trade products are analogous to plants and pollinators, and the whole trade network is characterized by a low nestedness temperature which is typical for the ecological networks. This approach provides new mutualistic features of the world trade highlighting new significance of countries and trade products for the world trade.

[1]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks , 2007, Nature.

[2]  J. Bascompte,et al.  The modularity of pollination networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Scale-free networks , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[4]  Serguei Saavedra,et al.  Strong contributors to network persistence are the most vulnerable to extinction , 2011, Nature.

[5]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Horacio Ceva,et al.  Two classes of bipartite networks: nested biological and social systems. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Diego P. Vázquez,et al.  ASYMMETRIC SPECIALIZATION: A PERVASIVE FEATURE OF PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS , 2004 .

[8]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[9]  George Sugihara,et al.  Complex systems: Ecology for bankers , 2008, Nature.

[10]  Miguel A. Rodríguez-Gironés,et al.  A new algorithm to calculate the nestedness temperature of presence–absence matrices , 2006 .

[11]  Robert M. May,et al.  Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics , 1976, Nature.

[12]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Roberto P. J. Perazzo,et al.  Understanding and characterizing nestedness in mutualistic bipartite networks , 2008, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[14]  M. Pascual,et al.  Ecological networks : Linking structure to dynamics in food webs , 2006 .

[15]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Evolution of networks , 2001, cond-mat/0106144.

[16]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Large Scale Structure and Dynamics of Complex Networks: From Information Technology to Finance and Natural Science , 2007 .

[17]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity , 2009, Nature.

[18]  Mw Hirsch,et al.  Chaos In Dynamical Systems , 2016 .

[19]  César A. Hidalgo,et al.  Scale-free networks , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[20]  R. May,et al.  Systemic risk in banking ecosystems , 2011, Nature.

[21]  Horacio Ceva,et al.  Why nestedness in mutualistic networks? , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  Dima Shepelyansky,et al.  Google matrix of the world trade network , 2011, ArXiv.