SemWebDL: A privacy-preserving Semantic Web infrastructure for digital libraries

Recent advances in digital libraries have been closely intertwined with advances in Internet technologies. With the advent of the Web, digital libraries have been able to reach constituencies previously unanticipated. Because of the wide deployability of Web-accessible digital libraries, the potential for privacy violations has also grown tremendously. The much touted Semantic Web, with its agent, service, and ontology technologies, is slated to take the Web to another qualitative level in advances. Unfortunately, these advances may also open doors for privacy violations in ways never seen before. We propose a Semantic Web infrastructure, called SemWebDL, that enables the dynamic composition of disparate and autonomous digital libraries while preserving user privacy. In the proposed infrastructure, users will be able to pose more qualitative queries that may require the ad hoc collaboration of multiple digital libraries. In addition to the Semantic Web-based infrastructure, the quality of the response would rest on extraneous information in the form of a profile. We introduce the concept of communities to enable subject-based cooperation and search speedup. Further, digital libraries’ heterogeneity and autonomy are transcended by a layered Web-service-based infrastructure. Semantic Web-based digital library providers would advertise to Web services, which in turn are organized in communities accessed by users. For the purpose of privacy preservation, we devise a three-tier privacy model consisting of user privacy, Web service privacy, and digital library privacy that offers autonomy of perspectives for privacy definition and violation. We propose an approach that seamlessly interoperates with potentially conflicting privacy definitions and policies at the different levels of the Semantic Web-based infrastructure. A key aspect in the approach is the use of reputations for outsourcing Web services. A Web service reputation is associated with its behavior with regard to privacy preservation. We developed a technique that uses attribute ontologies and information flow difference to collect, evaluate, and disseminate the reputation of Web services.

[1]  K G Mann,et al.  How Much Factor V Is Enough? , 2000, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[2]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Agents, trust, and information access on the semantic web , 2002, SGMD.

[3]  Clifford Nass,et al.  A Reputation Mechanism for Business-to-Business Electronic Commerce That Accounts for Rater Credibility , 2005, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[4]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[5]  Ernesto Damiani,et al.  Managing and Sharing Servents' Reputations in P2P Systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[6]  Munindar P. Singh Trustworthy Service Composition: Challenges and Research Questions , 2002, Trust, Reputation, and Security.

[7]  Hector Garcia-Molina,et al.  The Eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks , 2003, WWW '03.

[8]  Michael E. Lesk,et al.  Practical Digital Libraries: Books, Bytes, and Bucks , 1997 .

[9]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Trust and reputation model in peer-to-peer networks , 2003, Proceedings Third International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2P2003).

[10]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Measuring the reputation of web sites: a preliminary exploration , 2001, JCDL '01.

[11]  William L. Anderson Digital libraries: a brief introduction , 1997, SIGG.

[12]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  OIL: An Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web , 2001, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[13]  Athman Bouguettaya,et al.  Privacy on the Web: Facts, Challenges, and Solutions , 2003, IEEE Secur. Priv..

[14]  Mostafa H. Ammar,et al.  A reputation system for peer-to-peer networks , 2003, NOSSDAV '03.

[15]  G Stix,et al.  The mice that warred. , 2001, Scientific American.

[16]  Ling Liu,et al.  A reputation-based trust model for peer-to-peer ecommerce communities , 2003, EC.

[17]  R. Dingledine,et al.  Reputation in P2P Anonymity Systems , 2003 .

[18]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  Detecting deception in reputation management , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[19]  E. Michael Maximilien,et al.  Conceptual model of web service reputation , 2002, SGMD.

[20]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Toward a worldwide digital library , 1998, CACM.

[21]  Boi Faltings,et al.  An incentive compatible reputation mechanism , 2003, EEE International Conference on E-Commerce, 2003. CEC 2003..

[22]  Athman Bouguettaya,et al.  Efficient access to Web services , 2004, IEEE Internet Computing.

[23]  Athman Bouguettaya,et al.  Preserving privacy in web services , 2002, WIDM '02.

[24]  Peter Lyman,et al.  How Much Storage is Enough? , 2003, ACM Queue.

[25]  Michael N. Huhns,et al.  Trusted Autonomy , 2002, IEEE Internet Comput..

[26]  Ching-chih Chen,et al.  Digital Libraries: Universal Access to Human Knowledge , 2001 .