CODING OF SOUND IN A COCHLEAR PROSTHESIS: SOME THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS a

The optimal strategy for coding speech as intelligible across an intracochlear multielectrode array reflects a compromise between what should be done and what can be done. That is, it reflects a compromise between simulation of the critical aspects of the representation of speech elements across the auditory nerve array and the idealization of that representation, given practical limitations of the spatiotemporal control of nerve array stimulation with applicable intracochlear electrodes. Recent studies on the auditory nerve array representation of speech elements (especially the studies of Sachs, Young and colleagues coupled with parametric studies with cochlear implant devices ‘k--B indicate, on a first order, what is essential to represent in the distributed excitation of the nerve array. Further, they reveal how high levels of speech recognition are accounted for in the distributed patterns of activation of the auditory nerve array in normalhearing subjects driven with low-channel-number v ~ c o d e r s . ~ These studies suggest that the “optimal” simulation model is a special kind of channel vocoder, especially given limitations of electrical stimulation control of the auditory nerve array. In this report, it will be argued that a distributed nerve-stimulation vocoder model constitutes a rational starting point for progressive development of a multichannel cochlear prosthesis. Nerve array stimulation control required to implement such a model is described. Some basic test results in a patient stimulated with threeand four-channel versions of such a model are described. Physical and practical limitations that impede development of more complex stimulation models are discussed. Finally, strategies for improving the simulation (reducing distortion) is such devices are briefly summarized.

[1]  M. Sachs,et al.  Effects of nonlinearities on speech encoding in the auditory nerve. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  E Owens,et al.  RESULTS FOR SOME PATIENTS WITH COCHLEAR IMPLANTS ON THE MINIMAL AUDITORY CAPABILITIES (MAC) BATTERY a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[3]  D K Eddington,et al.  SPEECH RECOGNITION IN DEAF SUBJECTS WITH MULTICHANNEL INTRACOCHLEAR ELECTRODES a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Gerald E. Loeb,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the eighth nerve in cat: Temporal properties of unit responses in the large spherical cell region of the AVCN , 1981 .

[5]  M. Sachs,et al.  Representation of steady-state vowels in the temporal aspects of the discharge patterns of populations of auditory-nerve fibers. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Multielectrode intracochlear implants. Nerve survival and stimulation patterns. , 1977, Archives of otolaryngology.

[7]  Edwin Charles Moxon,et al.  Neural and mechanical responses to electric stimulation of the cat's inner ear , 1971 .

[8]  D K Eddington,et al.  Fundamental considerations in designing auditory implants. , 1979, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[9]  M I Miller,et al.  SPEECH ENCODING IN THE AUDITORY NERVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANTS a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  D O Kim,et al.  A population study of cochlear nerve fibers: comparison of spatial distributions of average-rate and phase-locking measures of responses to single tones. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  R L Hoag,et al.  National Technical Institute for the Deaf , 1965, Exceptional children.

[12]  M M Merzenich,et al.  Some considerations of multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in the profoundly deaf; interfacing electrode arrays with the auditory nerve array. , 1979, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[13]  M M Merzenich,et al.  Coding Considerations in Design of Cochlear Prostheses , 1980, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[14]  J M Marston,et al.  Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. V. The effect of protein on Pt dissolution. , 1980, Biomaterials.

[15]  SPATIOTEMPORAL RESPONSE PATTERNS IN POPULATIONS OF COCHLEAR NERVE FIBERS: SINGLE‐ AND TWO‐TONE STUDIES a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[16]  W. Dobelle,et al.  Auditory Prostheses Research with Multiple Channel Intracochlear Stimulation in Man , 1978, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[17]  F. Hambrecht,et al.  CRITERIA FOR SELECTING ELECTRODES FOR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[18]  W M Jenkins,et al.  BIOPHYSICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF THE AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.