Walkable new urban LEED_Neighborhood-Development (LEED-ND) community design and children's physical activity: selection, environmental, or catalyst effects?

BackgroundInterest is growing in physical activity-friendly community designs, but few tests exist of communities explicitly designed to be walkable. We test whether students living in a new urbanist community that is also a pilot LEED_ND (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design-Neighborhood Development) community have greater accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) across particular time periods compared to students from other communities. We test various time/place periods to see if the data best conform to one of three explanations for MVPA. Environmental effects suggest that MVPA occurs when individuals are exposed to activity-friendly settings; selection effects suggest that walkable community residents prefer MVPA, which leads to both their choice of a walkable community and their high levels of MVPA; catalyst effects occur when walking to school creates more MVPA, beyond the school commute, on schooldays but not weekends.MethodsFifth graders (n = 187) were sampled from two schools representing three communities: (1) a walkable community, Daybreak, designed with new urbanist and LEED-ND pilot design standards; (2) a mixed community (where students lived in a less walkable community but attended the walkable school so that part of the route to school was walkable), and (3) a less walkable community. Selection threats were addressed through controlling for parental preferences for their child to walk to school as well as comparing in-school MVPA for the walkable and mixed groups.ResultsMinutes of MVPA were tested with 3 × 2 (Community by Gender) analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs). Community walkability related to more MVPA during the half hour before and after school and, among boys only, more MVPA after school. Boys were more active than girls, except during the half hour after school. Students from the mixed and walkable communities--who attended the same school--had similar in-school MVPA levels, and community groups did not differ in weekend MVPA, providing little evidence of selection effects.ConclusionsEven after our controls for selection effects, we find evidence of environmental effects on MVPA. These results suggest that walkable community design, according to new urbanist and LEED_ND pilot design standards, is related to higher MVPA among students at certain times.

[1]  Leonard H Epstein,et al.  The neighborhood and home environments: Disparate relationships with physical activity and sedentary behaviors in youth , 2007, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[2]  Noreen C McDonald,et al.  Active transportation to school: trends among U.S. schoolchildren, 1969-2001. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[3]  P. Calthorpe The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream , 1993 .

[4]  Stewart G Trost,et al.  Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  C. Vogt,et al.  Demographic, environmental, access, and attitude factors that influence walking to school by elementary school-aged children. , 2009, The Journal of school health.

[6]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  Self-Selection in the Relationship between the Built Environment and Walking: Empirical Evidence from Northern California , 2006 .

[7]  J. Sallis,et al.  Urban form correlates of pedestrian travel in youth: Differences by gender, race-ethnicity and household attributes , 2007 .

[8]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  School site and the potential to walk to school: the impact of street connectivity and traffic exposure in school neighborhoods. , 2011, Health & place.

[9]  A. Cooper,et al.  The broader impact of walking to school among adolescents: seven day accelerometry based study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Karin Pfeiffer,et al.  Travel by walking before and after school and physical activity among adolescent girls. , 2007, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[11]  L. Mâsse,et al.  Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Personal, family, social, and environmental correlates of active commuting to school. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[13]  Kevin Patrick,et al.  Community Design and Access to Recreational Facilities as Correlates of Adolescent Physical Activity and Body-Mass Index. , 2006, Journal of physical activity & health.

[14]  Andrew P. Jones,et al.  Environmental determinants of active travel in youth: A review and framework for future research , 2008, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[15]  A. Khattak,et al.  Can New Urbanism Encourage Physical Activity?: Comparing a New Urbanist Neighborhood with Conventional Suburbs , 2006 .

[16]  J. Sirard,et al.  Walking and Bicycling to School: A Review , 2008 .

[17]  Russell R Pate,et al.  Physical activity and active commuting to elementary school. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  Marc Schlossberg,et al.  School Trips: Effects of Urban Form and Distance on Travel Mode , 2006 .

[19]  Patty Freedson,et al.  Calibration of accelerometer output for children. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  Angie S Page,et al.  Commuting to school: are children who walk more physically active? , 2003, American journal of preventive medicine.

[21]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .

[22]  Xinyu Cao,et al.  Examining the Impacts of Residential Self‐Selection on Travel Behaviour: A Focus on Empirical Findings , 2009 .

[23]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Walking to school: Community design and child and parent barriers , 2011 .

[24]  R. J. Shephard,et al.  Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity From Ages 9 to 15 Years , 2009 .

[25]  R. Uauy,et al.  Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. , 2004, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[26]  Peter J Hannan,et al.  Longitudinal and Secular Trends in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior During Adolescence , 2006, Pediatrics.

[27]  K. Pont,et al.  Environmental correlates of children's active transportation: a systematic literature review. , 2009, Health & place.

[28]  Ajay Garde,et al.  Sustainable by Design?: Insights From U.S. LEED-ND Pilot Projects , 2009 .

[29]  A. Nelson TOWARD A NEW METROPOLIS: THE OPPORTUNITY TO REBUILD AMERICA , 2004 .

[30]  R. Houts,et al.  Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity from ages 9 to 15 years. , 2008, JAMA.

[31]  J. Prochaska,et al.  A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[32]  D. Ward,et al.  A systematic review of interventions for promoting active transportation to school , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[33]  Susan H Babey,et al.  Sociodemographic, Family, and Environmental Factors Associated with Active Commuting to School among US Adolescents , 2009, Journal of public health policy.

[34]  Kelly R Evenson,et al.  Accelerometer use in physical activity: best practices and research recommendations. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[35]  J. Sallis,et al.  Leisure-time physical activity in school environments: an observational study using SOPLAY. , 2000, Preventive medicine.

[36]  Xinyu Cao,et al.  Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: A focus on methodologies , 2008 .

[37]  Xinyu Cao,et al.  Neighborhood Design and Children's Outdoor Play: Evidence from Northern California , 2023, Children, Youth and Environments.

[38]  L. Andersen,et al.  Physical activity levels of children who walk, cycle, or are driven to school. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[39]  Randall G. Arendt,et al.  Charter of the New Urbanism , 1999 .

[40]  Carrie D. Patnode,et al.  The relative influence of demographic, individual, social, and environmental factors on physical activity among boys and girls , 2010, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[41]  J. Sallis,et al.  Active commuting to school: Associations with environment and parental concerns. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[42]  G. Welk,et al.  Reliability of accelerometry-based activity monitors: a generalizability study. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[43]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  The Irvine-Minnesota inventory to measure built environments: reliability tests. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[44]  Kevin J. Krizek,et al.  Hot, congested, crowded and diverse: Emerging research agendas in planning , 2009 .

[45]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .

[46]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Walking routes to school in new urban and suburban neighborhoods: An environmental walkability analysis of blocks and routes , 2011 .

[47]  J. Sallis,et al.  Urban Form Relationships with Walk Trip Frequency and Distance among Youth , 2007, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[48]  S. Griffin,et al.  The contribution of active travel to children's physical activity levels: cross-sectional results from the ALSPAC study. , 2009, Preventive medicine.

[49]  B. Brown,et al.  New Urban and Standard Suburban Subdivisions: Evaluating Psychological and Social Goals , 2001 .

[50]  D. O'Gorman,et al.  Active commuting to school: How far is too far? , 2008, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[51]  A. Timperio,et al.  Prevalence, trends and environmental influences on child and youth physical activity. , 2007, Medicine and sport science.

[52]  J. Irwin,et al.  The influence of the physical environment and sociodemographic characteristics on children's mode of travel to and from school. , 2009, American journal of public health.

[53]  K. Powell,et al.  The Effectiveness of Urban Design and Land Use and Transport Policies and Practices to Increase Physical Activity: A Systematic Review. , 2006, Journal of physical activity & health.