Finding the best photoconductor for digital mammography detectors

A cascaded model of the spatial-frequency-dependent detective quantum efficiency (DQE) was developed for various photoconductor materials for use in mammography. The model uses Monte Carlo calculations of the absorbed energy distributions for each material and, after experimental validation for an amorphous selenium (a-Se) detector, was used to predict the potential performance of each material. We show that all materials can have a modulation-transfer function value greater than 0.75 at frequencies up to 30 cycles mm � 1 and a DQE value greater than 0.2 at frequencies up to 10 cycles mm � 1 . As such, all materials have good potential for this application. The quantum-noise-limited exposure level determines the ability of each detector material to operate at low exposure levels. It is shown that a-Se detectors have the highest limit (0.01 mR), which is still likely to be low enough for mammography.

[1]  Safa Kasap,et al.  Amorphous Semiconductors Usher in Digital X‐Ray Imaging , 1997 .

[2]  I. Cunningham,et al.  On the Development of Digital Radiography Detectors : A Review , 2008 .

[3]  Safa Kasap,et al.  Photoconductor selection for digital flat panel x-ray image detectors based on the dark current , 2000 .

[4]  Paul J. Sellin,et al.  Thick film compound semiconductors for X-ray imaging applications , 2006 .

[5]  Robert A. Street,et al.  Approaching the theoretical x-ray sensitivity with Hgl2 direct detection image sensors , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[6]  Ho Kyung Kim,et al.  Computational Toolset for X-Ray Spectral Analysis , 2006 .

[7]  J. Yorkston.  Recent developments in digital radiography detectors , 2007 .

[8]  Ian A. Cunningham,et al.  Computational engine for development of complex cascaded models of signal and noise in X-ray imaging systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  R. Steadman,et al.  Status of Direct Conversion Detectors for Medical Imaging With X-Rays , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[10]  J A Rowlands,et al.  Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency. , 1997, Medical physics.

[11]  A Fenster,et al.  Monte Carlo studies of x-ray energy absorption and quantum noise in megavoltage transmission radiography. , 1995, Medical physics.

[12]  I. Cunningham.  Applied Linear-Systems Theory , 2000 .

[13]  A. Karellas,et al.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade. , 2008, Medical physics.

[14]  Denny L. Y. Lee,et al.  New digital detector for projection radiography , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[15]  Rodney Shaw,et al.  Signal-to-noise optimization of medical imaging systems , 1999 .

[16]  A Fenster,et al.  A spatial-frequency dependent quantum accounting diagram and detective quantum efficiency model of signal and noise propagation in cascaded imaging systems. , 1994, Medical physics.

[17]  Safa Kasap,et al.  Springer Handbook of Electronic and Photonic Materials , 2007 .