Fundamental Tradeoffs between Sparsity, Sensing Diversity and Sensing Capacity

A fundamental problem in sensor networks is to determine the sensing capacity, i.e., the minimum number of sensors required to monitor a given region to a desired degree of fidelity based on noisy sensor data. This question has direct bearing on the corresponding coverage problem, wherein the task is to determine the maximum coverage region with a given set of sensors. In this paper we show that sensing capacity is a function of SNR sparsity-the inherent complexity/dimensionality of the underlying signal/information space and its frequency of occurrence-and sensing diversity, i.e., the number of independent paths from the underlying signal space to the multiple sensors. We derive fundamental tradeoffs between SNR, sparsity, diversity and capacity. We show that the capacity is a monotonic function of SNR and diversity. A surprising result is that as sparsity approaches zero so does the sensing capacity irrespective of diversity. This implies for instance that to reliably monitor a small number of targets in a given region requires an disproportionally large number of sensors.

[1]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Recovery of short, complex linear combinations via /spl lscr//sub 1/ minimization , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[2]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Sparse Signal Detection from Incoherent Projections , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings.

[3]  Pradeep K. Khosla,et al.  Sensing capacity for discrete sensor network applications , 2005, IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005..

[4]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Decentralized compression and predistribution via randomized gossiping , 2006, 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[5]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[6]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Just relax: convex programming methods for identifying sparse signals in noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[7]  David L Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  R.G. Baraniuk,et al.  Universal distributed sensing via random projections , 2006, 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[10]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[11]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Signal Reconstruction From Noisy Random Projections , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.