Learning from experts: fostering extended thinking in the early phases of the design process

Empirical evidence on the way in which expert designers from different domains cognitively connect their internal processes with external resources is presented in the context of an extended cognition model. The article focuses briefly on the main trends in the extended design cognition theory and in particular on recent trends in information processing and embodiment theory. The aim of the paper is to reflect on the implications of an understanding of expert design cognition as an extended system, which can account for complexity and non-linearity in design thinking and problem-solving, for technology and design education. This is achieved by showing the relevance of the cross-correlations and the dynamics involved at the intersection of cognitive phases, intention-driven decision making and embodiment principles of experts for novice education in technology and design. It is argued that twentieth century one-sided approaches to design education no longer adequately serve the needs of the twenty first century. It is further argued that a combined information-processing + embodiment approach may be the answer. The article presents salient results of a case study using think-aloud-protocol studies in a quasi-experimental format that was used as it has proven to be a central instrument yielding scientific data in the cognitive science paradigm. Results suggested extended design environments may be particularly well-suited to the mediation of design thinking. Finally, based on these results, the article examines how educators can exploit the combined approach to advance the making of connections between the inner and outer world in design education.

[1]  Hugh Coolican Research Methods and Statistics , 1999 .

[2]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[3]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise. , 2003 .

[4]  Henri Christiaans,et al.  Creativity in Design Engineering and the Role of Knowledge: Modelling the Expert , 2005 .

[5]  L. Cohen,et al.  Research methods in education, 6th ed. , 2007 .

[6]  R. Gibbs Embodiment and Cognitive Science: Concepts , 2005 .

[7]  Chun-Heng Ho,et al.  Some phenomena of problem decomposition strategy for design thinking: differences between novices and experts , 2001 .

[8]  John R. Dakers,et al.  Analyzing Best Practices in Technology Education , 2007 .

[9]  Richard Green,et al.  Understanding practice in design and technology , 1996 .

[10]  Maria Margaretha Catharina Haupt,et al.  The cognitive dynamics of socio-technological thinking in the early phases of expert designers' design processes , 2013 .

[11]  Lassi A. Liikkanen,et al.  Exploring problem decomposition in conceptual design among novice designers , 2009 .

[12]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Management of change : Implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering , 2007 .

[13]  S. Petrina,et al.  Researching cognition and technology: how we learn across the lifespan , 2008 .

[14]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 2008 .

[15]  Hugh Coolican Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology , 1993 .

[16]  G. Miller,et al.  Plans and the structure of behavior , 1960 .

[17]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Motivating the Notion of Generic Design within Information-Processing Theory: The Design Problem Space , 1989, AI Mag..

[18]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[19]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Cognitive Flexibility, Constructivism, and Hypertext: Random Access Instruction for Advanced Knowledge Acquisition in Ill-Structured Domains , 2012 .

[20]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  The Psychology of Abilities, Competencies, and Expertise: Expertise, Competence, and Creative Ability: The Perplexing Complexities , 2003 .

[21]  Kostas Terzidis The Etymology of Design: Pre-Socratic Perspective , 2007, Design Issues.

[22]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction : A Conversation , 2013 .

[23]  John R. Anderson,et al.  History of Success and Current Context in Problem Solving Combined Influences on Operator Selection , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  M. Bickhard Is Embodiment Necessary , 2008 .

[25]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis and Expert Thought: Concurrent Verbalizations of Thinking during Experts' Performance on Representative Tasks , 2006 .

[26]  V. Goel Sketches of thought , 1995 .

[27]  N. Cross Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[28]  Zoe Drayson Extended cognition and the metaphysics of mind , 2010, Cognitive Systems Research.

[29]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[30]  Vinod Goel,et al.  The Structure of Design Problem Spaces , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  R. W. Shephard,et al.  Human judgements and optimality , 1964 .

[32]  Leslie Marsh,et al.  Introduction to the special issue “Extended Mind” , 2010, Cognitive Systems Research.

[33]  P. Robbins,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition , 2001 .

[34]  Mukyeong Kim,et al.  An underlying cognitive aspect of design creativity: Limited Commitment Mode control strategy , 2007 .

[35]  Marc J. de Vries Teaching about Technology , 2016 .

[36]  Vesna Popovic,et al.  Expertise development in product design-strategic and domain-specific knowledge connections , 2004 .

[37]  Moshe Barak,et al.  Fostering Human Development Through Engineering and Technology Education , 2011 .

[38]  Itay Shani,et al.  Making it mental: in search for the golden mean of the extended cognition controversy , 2013 .

[39]  John R. Dakers,et al.  Defining Technological Literacy , 2006 .

[40]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[41]  Michael L. Anderson Embodied Cognition: A field guide , 2003, Artif. Intell..

[42]  P. Calvo,et al.  Handbook of cognitive science : an embodied approach , 2008 .

[43]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Ecological Psychology: Six Principles for an Embodied–Embedded Approach to Behavior , 2008 .

[44]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[45]  John S. Gero,et al.  Creativity, emergence and evolution in design , 1996, Knowl. Based Syst..

[46]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  The ecological approach to perception , 2002 .

[47]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in Design: an overview , 2004 .

[48]  G. Miller,et al.  Plans and the structure of behavior , 1960 .

[49]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in Design: Analyzing and Modeling the Creative Leap , 2017 .

[50]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[51]  D. Kirsh Problem Solving and Situated Cognition , 2009 .

[52]  Rivka Oxman,et al.  The thinking eye: visual re-cognition in design emergence , 2002 .

[53]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  How do Designers Shift their Focus of Attention in their Own Sketches? , 2002, Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning.

[54]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance , 2006 .

[55]  C. Teddlie,et al.  Foundations of mixed methods research , 2013 .

[56]  A. Mark Kilgour The Creative Process: The Effects of Domain Specific Knowledge and Creative Thinking Techniques on Creativity , 2007 .

[57]  K. Anders Ericsson,et al.  The Psychology of Abilities, Competencies, and Expertise: The Search for General Abilities and Basic Capacities: Theoretical Implications from the Modifiability and Complexity of Mechanisms Mediating Expert Performance , 2003 .

[58]  D. Schoen Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[59]  John S. Gero,et al.  An approach to the analysis of design protocols , 1998 .

[60]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  DRM, a Design Research Methodology , 2009 .

[61]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[62]  Marc J. de Vries,et al.  Teaching about Technology: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Technology for Non-philosophers , 2005 .

[63]  Walter G. Vincenti,et al.  What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History , 1990 .

[64]  Andrew D. Wilson,et al.  Gibson's ecological approach : a model for the benefits of a theory driven psychology / Sabrina Golonka, Andrew D. Wilson. , 2012 .

[65]  Maggi Savin-Baden,et al.  Challenging Models and Perspectives of Problem-Based Learning , 2007 .

[66]  Kay Stables,et al.  Critical Issues to Consider When Introducing Technology Education into the Curriculum of Young Learners , 1997 .

[67]  Marc J. de Vries Technological knowledge and artifacts : an analytical view , 2006 .

[68]  Chitra Natarajan Culture and Technology Education , 2007 .

[69]  Linda B. Smith Cognition as a dynamic system: Principles from embodiment , 2005 .

[70]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions , 1998 .

[71]  Stephen Petrina,et al.  Advanced Teaching Methods for the Technology Classroom , 2006 .