Roadside detection of impairment under the influence of ketamine--evaluation of ketamine impairment symptoms with reference to its concentration in oral fluid and urine.

Although there are many roadside testing devices available for the screening of abused drugs, none of them can be used for the detection of ketamine, a popular abused drug in Hong Kong. In connection to local drug driving legislation, effective roadside detection of ketamine in suspected drug-impaired drivers has to be established. According to the drug evaluation and classification program (DEC), ketamine is classified in the phencyclidine (PCP) category. However, no study has been performed regarding the signs and symptoms exhibited by users under the influence of ketamine. In a study to develop a protocol for effective roadside detection of drug-impaired drivers, 62 volunteers exiting from discos were assessed using field impairment tests (FIT) that included measurements of three vital signs (i.e. body temperature, pulse rate and blood pressure), three eye examinations [pupil size, lack of convergence (LOC) and horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN)] and four divided attention tests (Romberg, one-leg stand, finger-to-nose and walk-and-turn tests). Subsequent laboratory analysis of oral fluid and urine samples from the participants revealed the presence of common abused drugs in both the urine and oral fluid samples of 55 subjects. The remaining 7 subjects with no drug in their oral fluid samples were used as drug-free subjects. In addition, 10 volunteers from the laboratory who were regarded as drug-free subjects were also assessed using the same FIT. Among the 62 volunteers, 39 of them were detected with ketamine in their oral fluid. Of these ketamine users, 21 of them (54%) with only ketamine found in their oral fluid samples while the rest (18 subjects) of them had other drugs (i.e. MA, MDMA, benzodiazepines and/or THC) in addition to ketamine. Of the 21 ketamine-only users, 15 of them (71%) were successfully identified by FIT. It was found that when salivary ketamine concentrations were greater than 300 ng/mL, signs of impairment became evident, with over 90% detection rate using the FIT. By comparing the FIT observations on the 21 ketamine-only users with the drug-free subjects, the typical signs and symptoms observable for subjects under the influence of ketamine included LOC, HGN, elevated pulse rate and in general, failing the divided attention tests, especially the walk-and-turn and one-leg stand.

[1]  P. Leaverton,et al.  Evaluation of the accuracy of on-site multi-analyte drug testing devices in the determination of the prevalence of illicit drugs in drivers. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  Philip Swann,et al.  The incidence of drugs in drivers killed in Australian road traffic crashes. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[3]  Nele Samyn,et al.  The use of oral fluid and sweat wipes for the detection of drugs of abuse in drivers. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[4]  B Ludes,et al.  Comparison of the prevalence of alcohol, cannabis and other drugs between 900 injured drivers and 900 control subjects: results of a French collaborative study. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[5]  J T Everest,et al.  THE INCIDENCE OF DRUGS IN ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES , 1988 .

[6]  G W Mercer,et al.  Alcohol, drugs, and impairment in fatal traffic accidents in British Columbia. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  F. Álvarez,et al.  Presence of illegal drugs in drivers involved in fatal road traffic accidents in Spain. , 2000, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[8]  D F Preusser,et al.  THE INCIDENCE AND ROLE OF DRUGS IN FATALLY INJURED DRIVERS. FINAL REPORT , 1992 .

[9]  Wing-Chi Cheng,et al.  A high-throughput urinalysis of abused drugs based on a SPE-LC-MS/MS method coupled with an in-house developed post-analysis data treatment system. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[10]  A. Verstraete,et al.  Oral fluid testing for driving under the influence of drugs: history, recent progress and remaining challenges. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[11]  J Michael Walsh,et al.  An evaluation of rapid point-of-collection oral fluid drug-testing devices. , 2003, Journal of analytical toxicology.

[12]  P. Swann,et al.  The involvement of drugs in drivers of motor vehicles killed in Australian road traffic crashes. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  A. Egberts,et al.  Psychoactive substance use and the risk of motor vehicle accidents. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  H Gjerde,et al.  Incidence of alcohol and drugs in fatally injured car drivers in Norway. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  D. Crouch,et al.  A comparison of ONTRAK TESTCUP, abuscreen ONTRAK, abuscreen ONLINE, and GC/MS urinalysis test results. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[16]  L. Kadehjian Legal issues in oral fluid testing. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[17]  P. White,et al.  Ketamine--its pharmacology and therapeutic uses. , 1982, Anesthesiology.

[18]  P. Lillsunde,et al.  A comparison between on-site immunoassay drug-testing devices and laboratory results. , 2001, Forensic science international.