Anatomical limitations in mental transformations of body parts

Two experiments investigated whether possible and impossible body postures influence mental rotation processes differently considering that anatomical limitations constrain the way in which subjects perform mental transformations of body parts. In Experiment 1, mental rotation was performed on two stimuli presented simultaneously. Both possible and impossible body postures elicited mental rotation, although the mental rotation rate was slower for impossible postures. In Experiment 2, only one stimulus was presented at a time and subjects decided whether it represented a correct body-part configuration or not. A typical mental rotation function was only present for correct body-part configurations. The results are discussed in terms of the familiarity of the stimuli. Unfamiliar stimuli (physically impossible) are rotated via local representations of their parts, whilst global representations are used for rotating familiar (anatomically correct) stimuli.

[1]  V. Stone,et al.  The Body-Inversion Effect , 2003, Psychological science.

[2]  E. Mayer,et al.  Representation of anatomical constraints in motor imagery: Mental rotation of a body segment , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[3]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[4]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Mental-rotation deficits following damage to the right basal ganglia. , 2002, Neuropsychology.

[5]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  Viewpoint-dependent Priming Effects in the Perception of Human Actions and Body Postures , 1999 .

[6]  I. Dror,et al.  Visual mental rotation of possible and impossible objects , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  M. Jeannerod.  The cognitive neuroscience of action , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  M. Petrides,et al.  Evidence for a dorso-medial parietal system involved in mental transformations of the body. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  L. Parsons,et al.  Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET , 1995, Nature.

[10]  M. Farah,et al.  The psychological reality of the body schema: a test with normal participants. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  M. Kubovy,et al.  Mental Rotation, Mental Representation, and Flat Slopes , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  A. Sirigu,et al.  Multiple representations contribute to body knowledge processing. Evidence from a case of autotopagnosia. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  J. Freyd,et al.  Apparent Motion of the Human Body , 1990 .

[14]  J. Decety,et al.  Comparative analysis of actual and mental movement times in two graphic tasks , 1989, Brain and Cognition.

[15]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  C. E. Bethell-Fox,et al.  Mental rotation: effects of stimulus complexity and familiarity , 1988 .

[17]  L. Parsons.  Imagined spatial transformations of one's hands and feet , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  J. Ogden.  Autotopagnosia. Occurrence in a patient without nominal aphasia and with an intact ability to point to parts of animals and objects. , 1985, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  P. Viviani,et al.  The relation between linear extent and velocity in drawing movements , 1983, Neuroscience.

[20]  K. Sekiyama,et al.  Kinesthetic aspects of mental representations in the identification of left and right hands , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  M. Corballis,et al.  What’s up in mental rotation? , 1976 .

[22]  L. Cooper,et al.  Mental transformations and visual comparison processes: effects of complexity and similarity. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  L. Cooper.  Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[25]  J. Decety.  Neurobiologie des représentations mentales motrices , 1992 .