Ultimate Permeation Across Atomically Thin Porous Graphene

Thin and Selective Outpourings When using a membrane to separate materials, the efficiency of the separation is limited by how fast the gas or liquid passes through the membrane and by how selective it is. Thinner membranes usually allow for faster flow rates but are usually less selective. Attempting to maintain selectivity, Celebi et al. (p. 289) developed a sophisticated way to drill holes of controlled diameter in a graphene sheet about two layers thick. For such a thin membrane, the primary barriers to separation come from entrance and exit from the holes and not from the motion through the membrane. Atomically thin nanoporous graphene membranes can sustain ultimate permeation in mass transport. A two-dimensional (2D) porous layer can make an ideal membrane for separation of chemical mixtures because its infinitesimal thickness promises ultimate permeation. Graphene—with great mechanical strength, chemical stability, and inherent impermeability—offers a unique 2D system with which to realize this membrane and study the mass transport, if perforated precisely. We report highly efficient mass transfer across physically perforated double-layer graphene, having up to a few million pores with narrowly distributed diameters between less than 10 nanometers and 1 micrometer. The measured transport rates are in agreement with predictions of 2D transport theories. Attributed to its atomic thicknesses, these porous graphene membranes show permeances of gas, liquid, and water vapor far in excess of those shown by finite-thickness membranes, highlighting the ultimate permeation these 2D membranes can provide.

[1]  B. Cho,et al.  Penetration and lateral diffusion characteristics of polycrystalline graphene barriers. , 2014, Nanoscale.

[2]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  A review on membrane engineering for innovation in wearable fabrics and protective textiles , 2013 .

[3]  Miao Yu,et al.  Ultrathin, Molecular-Sieving Graphene Oxide Membranes for Selective Hydrogen Separation , 2013, Science.

[4]  Jae-Young Choi,et al.  Selective Gas Transport Through Few-Layered Graphene and Graphene Oxide Membranes , 2013, Science.

[5]  V. Berry Impermeability of graphene and its applications , 2013 .

[6]  A. Striolo,et al.  Simulation insights for graphene-based water desalination membranes. , 2013, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[7]  J. Robertson,et al.  Evolutionary kinetics of graphene formation on copper. , 2013, Nano letters.

[8]  J. Kong,et al.  Selective molecular transport through intrinsic defects in a single layer of CVD graphene. , 2012, ACS nano.

[9]  S. Koenig,et al.  Selective molecular sieving through porous graphene. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[10]  J. Grossman,et al.  Water desalination across nanoporous graphene. , 2012, Nano letters.

[11]  S. Ramaprabhu,et al.  Functionalized graphene sheets for arsenic removal and desalination of sea water , 2011 .

[12]  Carl W. Magnuson,et al.  Transfer of CVD-grown monolayer graphene onto arbitrary substrates. , 2011, ACS nano.

[13]  M. Dunn,et al.  Ultrastrong adhesion of graphene membranes. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[14]  A. M. van der Zande,et al.  Softened elastic response and unzipping in chemical vapor deposition graphene membranes. , 2011, Nano letters.

[15]  D. Branton,et al.  Graphene as a sub-nanometer trans-electrode membrane , 2010, Nature.

[16]  Fangyi Liang,et al.  Zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-7 based molecular sieve membrane for hydrogen separation , 2010 .

[17]  S. Dai,et al.  Porous graphene as the ultimate membrane for gas separation. , 2009, Nano letters.

[18]  S. Banerjee,et al.  Large-Area Synthesis of High-Quality and Uniform Graphene Films on Copper Foils , 2009, Science.

[19]  F. Durst,et al.  Pressure-driven diffusive gas flows in micro-channels: from the Knudsen to the continuum regimes , 2009 .

[20]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  Membrane Gas Separation: A Review/State of the Art , 2009 .

[21]  T. Nenoff,et al.  Internal surface modification of MFI-type zeolite membranes for high selectivity and high flux for hydrogen. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[22]  Kwang S. Kim,et al.  Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes , 2009, Nature.

[23]  S. Qiu,et al.  "Twin copper source" growth of metal-organic framework membrane: Cu(3)(BTC)(2) with high permeability and selectivity for recycling H(2). , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[24]  Boyang Wang,et al.  Selective ion passage through functionalized graphene nanopores. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[25]  L. Robeson,et al.  The upper bound revisited , 2008 .

[26]  A. M. van der Zande,et al.  Impermeable atomic membranes from graphene sheets. , 2008, Nano letters.

[27]  M. Sahimi,et al.  Silicon carbide membranes for gas separation applications , 2007 .

[28]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Materials science of membranes for gas and vapor separation , 2006 .

[29]  B. Freeman,et al.  Plasticization-Enhanced Hydrogen Purification Using Polymeric Membranes , 2006, Science.

[30]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  Permeability and selectivity analysis for ultrafiltration membranes , 2005 .

[31]  Andre K. Geim,et al.  Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films , 2004, Science.

[32]  D. Luebke,et al.  A Review of Carbon Dioxide Selective Membranes: A Topical Report , 2003 .

[33]  R. Mahajan,et al.  Pushing the limits on possibilities for large scale gas separation: which strategies? , 2000 .

[34]  M. Rezac,et al.  Transport and thermal properties of poly(ether imide)/acetylene-terminated monomer blends , 1999 .

[35]  H. Verweij,et al.  High-selectivity, high-flux silica membranes for gas separation , 1998, Science.

[36]  K. Nagai,et al.  Gas permeability and stability of poly(1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne-co-1-phenyl-1-propyne) membranes , 1995 .

[37]  William D. Nix,et al.  Analysis of the accuracy of the bulge test in determining the mechanical properties of thin films , 1992 .

[38]  S. Nakatsuka,et al.  Transport and separation of proteins by ultrafiltration through sorptive and non-sorptive membranes , 1992 .

[39]  A. S. Berman,et al.  Flow and Self‐Diffusion of Gases in Capillaries. Part I , 1966 .

[40]  R. D. Present,et al.  Separation of a Gas Mixture Flowing through a Long Tube at Low Pressure , 1949 .

[41]  Stuart A. Brewer,et al.  Recent Advances in Breathable Barrier Membranes for Individual Protective Equipment , 2011 .

[42]  M. Balakrishnan,et al.  Bovine serum albumin-hemoglobin fractionation: significance of ultrafiltration system and feed solution characteristics , 2000, Bioseparation.

[43]  S. Sadhal,et al.  Boundary conditions for stokes flows near a porous membrane , 1994 .

[44]  M. Knudsen Die Gesetze der Molekularstrmung und der inneren Reibungsstrmung der Gase durch Rhren , 1909 .

[45]  R. A. Sampson,et al.  On Stokes's Current Function , 1891 .