Development of an innovative spacer grid model utilizing computational fluid dynamics within a subchannel analysis tool

In the past few decades the need for improved nuclear reactor safety analyses has led to a rapid development of advanced methods for multidimensional thermal-hydraulic analyses. These methods have become progressively more complex in order to account for the many physical phenomena anticipated during steady state and transient Light Water Reactor (LWR) conditions. The advanced thermal-hydraulic subchannel code COBRA-TF (Thurgood, M. J. et al., 1983) is used worldwide for best-estimate evaluations of the nuclear reactor safety margins. In the framework of a joint research project between the Pennsylvania State University (PSU) and AREVA NP GmbH, the theoretical models and numerics of COBRA-TF have been improved. Under the name F-COBRA-TF, the code has been subjected to an extensive verification and validation program and has been applied to variety of LWR steady state and transient simulations. To enable F-COBRA-TF for industrial applications, including safety margins evaluations and design analyses, the code spacer grid models were revised and substantially improved. The state-of-the-art in the modeling of the spacer grid effects on the flow thermalhydraulic performance in rod bundles employs numerical experiments performed by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) calculations. Because of the involved computational cost, the CFD codes cannot be yet used for full bundle predictions, but their capabilities can be utilized for development of more advanced and sophisticated models for subchannel-level analyses. A subchannel code, equipped with improved physical models, can be then a powerful tool for LWR safety and design evaluations. The unique contributions of this PhD research are seen as development, implementation,

[1]  Hisashi Ninokata,et al.  A modified equilibrium void distribution model applicable to subchannel-scale vapor-liquid cross flow model for conventional square and tight lattice BWR fuel bundles , 2005 .

[2]  Bum-Jin Chung,et al.  A scale analysis of the turbulent mixing rate for various Prandtl number flow fields in rod bundles , 2001 .

[3]  Kwang-Yong Kim,et al.  Numerical Optimization for the Design of a Spacer Grid with Mixing Vanes in a Pressurized Water Reactor Fuel Assembly , 2005 .

[4]  Satoru Sugawara,et al.  Droplet deposition and entrainment modeling based on the three-fluid model , 1990 .

[5]  James Demmel,et al.  A Supernodal Approach to Sparse Partial Pivoting , 1999, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[6]  Dong-Seong Sohn,et al.  Development of a Subchannel Analysis Code MATRA Applicable to PWRs and ALWRs , 1999 .

[7]  G. Park,et al.  Estimation of Anisotropic Factor and Turbulent Mixing Rate in Rod Bundles Based on the Flow Pulsation Phenomenon , 1997 .

[8]  Akimaro Kawahara,et al.  Flow redistribution due to void drift in two-phase flow in a multiple channel consisting of two subchannels , 1994 .

[9]  Stellan Hedberg,et al.  HEAT TRANSFER BETWEEN SUBCHANNELS IN A ROD BUNDLE. , 1970 .

[10]  Kuldip Singh,et al.  Turbulent mixing for air-water flows in simulated rod bundle geometries , 1972 .

[11]  J. A. Turner,et al.  Performance of conjugate gradient-like algorithms in transient two-phase subchannel analysis , 1991 .

[12]  J. E Kelly,et al.  Development of a two-fluid, two-phase model for light water reactor subchannel analysis , 1980 .

[13]  H. Shirai,et al.  Prediction of the Equilibrium Two-Phase Flow Distributions in Inter-Connected Subchannel Systems , 2001 .

[14]  G. Wallis One Dimensional Two-Phase Flow , 1969 .

[15]  Z. Karouta,et al.  3-D flow analyses for design of nuclear fuel spacer , 1995 .

[16]  Yue Fen Shen,et al.  An investigation of crossflow mixing effect caused by grid spacer with mixing blades in a rod bundle , 1991 .

[17]  P. Baxter The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Communications A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE U.S. AND KOREAN FILM INDUSTRIES: HISTORY, STRUCTURE, AND FINANCE , 2008 .

[18]  D. S. Rowe,et al.  Implications concerning rod bundle crossflow mixing based on measurements of turbulent flow structure , 1974 .

[19]  K. Rehme,et al.  The structure of turbulence in rod bundles and the implications on natural mixing between the subchannels , 1992 .

[20]  Yousef Saad,et al.  Iterative methods for sparse linear systems , 2003 .

[21]  Wang Kee In Numerical Study of Coolant Mixing Caused by the Flow Deflectors in a Nuclear Fuel Bundle , 2001 .

[22]  A. E. Dukler,et al.  Modelling flow pattern transitions for steady upward gas‐liquid flow in vertical tubes , 1980 .

[23]  L. Hochreiter,et al.  Analysis of the FLECHT SEASET unblocked bundle steam-cooling and boiloff tests. [PWR] , 1981 .

[24]  Kostadin Ivanov,et al.  Multilevel Methodology in Parallel Computing Environment for Evaluating BWR Safety Parameters , 2004 .

[25]  Bub Dong Chung,et al.  Development of a multi-dimensional thermal-hydraulic system code, MARS 1.3.1 , 1999 .

[26]  Henryk Anglart,et al.  Phase Distribution in a BWR Fuel Assembly and Evaluation of a Multidimensional Multifield Model , 2001 .

[27]  Dmitri Nickolaevich Ziabletsev PWR integrated safety analysis methodology using multi-level coupling algorithm , 2002 .

[28]  Sule Ergun MODELING OF DISPERSED FLOW FILM BOILING WITH TWO FLOW, FIVE FIELD EULERIAN- EULERIAN APPROACH AND EFFECTS OF SPACER GRIDS ON HEAT TRANSFER , 2005 .