Testing candidate plant barcode regions in the Myristicaceae

The concept and practice of DNA barcoding have been designed as a system to facilitate species identification and recognition. The primary challenge for barcoding plants has been to identify a suitable region on which to focus the effort. The slow relative nucleotide substitution rates of plant mitochondria and the technical issues with the use of nuclear regions have focused attention on several proposed regions in the plastid genome. One of the challenges for barcoding is to discriminate closely related or recently evolved species. The Myristicaceae, or nutmeg family, is an older group within the angiosperms that contains some recently evolved species providing a challenging test for barcoding plants. The goal of this study is to determine the relative utility of six coding (Universal Plastid Amplicon — UPA, rpoB, rpoc1, accD, rbcL, matK) and one noncoding (trnH‐psbA) chloroplast loci for barcoding in the genus Compsoneura using both single region and multiregion approaches. Five of the regions we tested were predominantly invariant across species (UPA, rpoB, rpoC1, accD, rbcL). Two of the regions (matK and trnH‐psbA) had significant variation and show promise for barcoding in nutmegs. We demonstrate that a two‐gene approach utilizing a moderately variable region (matK) and a more variable region (trnH‐psbA) provides resolution among all the Compsonuera species we sampled including the recently evolved C. sprucei and C. mexicana. Our classification analyses based on nonmetric multidimensional scaling ordination, suggest that the use of two regions results in a decreased range of intraspecific variation relative to the distribution of interspecific divergence with 95% of the samples correctly identified in a sequence identification analysis.

[1]  J. Kruskal Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method , 1964 .

[2]  S. Tucker,et al.  Floral development in Myristica (Myristicaceae). , 1986 .

[3]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  J. Armstrong Pollination by deceit in nutmeg (Myristica insipida, Myristicaceae): floral displays and beetle activity at male and female trees. , 1997, American journal of botany.

[5]  J. Ferguson On the use of genetic divergence for identifying species , 2002 .

[6]  J. Janovec,et al.  A Morphological Analysis of the Compsoneura sprucei Complex (Myristicaceae), With a New Combination for the Central American Species Compsoneura mexicana , 2002 .

[7]  Jeremy R. deWaard,et al.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  T. Scharaschkin,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of Magnoliales and Myristicaceae based on multiple data sets: implications for character evolution , 2003 .

[9]  D. Janzen,et al.  Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  P. Hebert,et al.  Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes , 2004, PLoS biology.

[11]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  MEGA3: Integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment , 2004, Briefings Bioinform..

[12]  Peter R. Minchin,et al.  An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination , 1987, Vegetatio.

[13]  Florian Meereis,et al.  PCOGR: Phylogenetic COG ranking as an online tool to judge the specificity of COGs with respect to freely definable groups of organisms , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[14]  C. Meyer,et al.  DNA Barcoding: Error Rates Based on Comprehensive Sampling , 2005, PLoS biology.

[15]  Nicolas Salamin,et al.  Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  D. Janzen,et al.  Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  P. Hollingsworth,et al.  Conserving taxonomic complexity. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  Kishori M. Konwar,et al.  DNA-BAR: distinguisher selection for DNA barcoding , 2005, Bioinform..

[19]  W. John Kress,et al.  300,000 species to identify: problems, progress, and prospects in DNA barcoding of land plants , 2006 .

[20]  C. Moritz,et al.  DNA barcoding will often fail to discover new animal species over broad parameter space. , 2006, Systematic biology.

[21]  Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al.  A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded , 2006 .

[22]  A. Fazekas,et al.  DNA barcoding in land plants: evaluation of rbcL in a multigene tiered approach , 2006 .

[23]  E. Schuettpelz,et al.  Identifying fern gametophytes using DNA sequences , 2006 .

[24]  G. Presting Identification of conserved regions in the plastid genome: implications for DNA barcoding and biological function , 2006 .

[25]  Gaurav Vaidya,et al.  DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. , 2006, Systematic biology.

[26]  D. Stevenson,et al.  A comparison of algorithms for the identification of specimens using DNA barcodes: examples from gymnosperms , 2007, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[27]  David L. Erickson,et al.  A Two-Locus Global DNA Barcode for Land Plants: The Coding rbcL Gene Complements the Non-Coding trnH-psbA Spacer Region , 2007, PloS one.

[28]  Mark W. Chase,et al.  A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants , 2007 .

[29]  A. Smith,et al.  The American species of Myristicaceae , 1937, Brittonia.

[30]  Amanda K. Neill,et al.  Studies of the Myristicaceae: an overview of the Compsoneura atopa complex, with descriptions of new species from Colombia , 2002, Brittonia.