Geostatistical sampling optimization of contaminated facilities

Geostatistics applied to radiological evaluation of nuclear premises provides methods to estimate radiological activities, together with their associated uncertainty. It enables a sophisticated sampling methodology combining radiation map and destructive samples. The radiological assessment is divided in two steps: first, a regular control of the surface activity is performed. Then, to assess the true contamination, concrete samples are collected and analyses are performed at several locations within the premises. These two types of measurement are first dealt separately, then cokriging techniques are applied to estimate the contamination over the premise, taking both information into account. This paper presents a methodological study of geostatistical and computational approaches to target suitable areas for additional radiological measures. In order to compare the proposed augmented sampling designs, several optimization criteria are taken into account. Their diversity ensures the coverage of a wide range of real problematics. Two algorithms (greedy algorithm and simulated annealing) are developed to optimize the chosen criterion value as a function of the location of the additional points. The sampling scenarios obtained with the different algorithms are compared in terms of optimization performance and computational efficiency.

[1]  M. Eldred,et al.  Efficient Global Reliability Analysis for Nonlinear Implicit Performance Functions , 2008 .

[2]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[3]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Near-optimal Observation Selection using Submodular Functions , 2007, AAAI.

[4]  Nicolas JEANNEE,et al.  Geostatistical sampling optimization of contaminated premises , 2008 .

[5]  Yvon Desnoyers Approche méthodologique pour la caractérisation géostatistique des contaminations radiologiques dans les installations nucléaires , 2010 .

[6]  M. L. Fisher,et al.  An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions—I , 1978, Math. Program..

[7]  J. Chilès,et al.  Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty , 1999 .

[8]  George Michailidis,et al.  Sequential Experiment Design for Contour Estimation From Complex Computer Codes , 2008, Technometrics.

[9]  P. Goovaerts Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives , 1999 .

[10]  Katherine Campbell,et al.  Introduction to disjunctive kriging and non-linear geostatistics , 1994 .

[11]  Geostatistics for radiological evaluation: study of structuring of extreme values , 2011 .

[12]  Laure Malherbe,et al.  Sampling design for air quality measurement surveys: An optimization approach , 2011 .

[13]  M. Goulard,et al.  Linear coregionalization model: Tools for estimation and choice of cross-variogram matrix , 1992 .

[14]  Dennis Weyland,et al.  Simulated annealing, its parameter settings and the longest common subsequence problem , 2008, GECCO '08.

[15]  K. Komnitsas,et al.  Mapping optimization based on sampling size in earth related and environmental phenomena , 2008 .