Finger control in the tripod grasp

The present study aimed to determine whether grasping is based on either (1) synchronous finger movements producing stereotyped types of grasp, or (2) independently controlled finger movements producing variable final finger postures. Participants reached for and grasped sphere-shaped objects of three sizes. They were allowed to select three different grasp configurations: a "pinch" grip (thumb and index finger), a "middle" grip (thumb and middle finger) and a "tripod" grip (thumb and index plus middle finger). Object distance from the subject was varied in order to verify whether finger control and final finger postures varied according to the degree of accuracy required by target object distance. All the participants always selected the tripod grip when reaching for the large and medium size objects. The pinch grip was used by half of the participants when reaching for the small object, but only in 17% of the trials. Target object distance did not appear to influence the type of selected grip. The tripod grip was found to consist of two different components: an aperture component (opening and closing the gap between the thumb and opposition finger) and a finger separation component (increasing and decreasing the gap between the index and middle fingers). The timing of the aperture component was the same for the index and middle fingers. In contrast, the timing of the finger separation was weakly coupled with the aperture components. Moreover, the relative spatial position among the three fingers during and at the end of grasp varied according to object size. When grasping the large object, both the index finger and the middle finger were in opposition to the thumb. In contrast, when grasping the small object, the index finger was less in opposition to the thumb with respect to the middle finger. The final spatial position of the thumb relative to the starting position was independent of object size, whereas those of the index and middle fingers varied with object size. The results support the notion that grasp is accomplished by using two virtual fingers formed by the thumb and one or more other fingers that synchronously open and close on the object along the opposition space [Arbib 1990; in: Jeannerod M (ed) Attention and performance XIII: motor representation and control. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 111–138]. This suggests a degree of coupling between the control of the virtual fingers.

[1]  J. Napier The prehensile movements of the human hand. , 1956, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  A. Wing,et al.  The Contribution of the Thumb to Reaching Movements , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[4]  M. Arbib Coordinated control programs for movements of the hand , 1985 .

[5]  T J Armstrong,et al.  An investigation of human palmar skin friction and the effects of materials, pinch force and moisture. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[6]  M. Jeannerod The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[7]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor control of voluntary arm movements. Kinematic and modelling study. , 1992, Biological cybernetics.

[9]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: effects of visual perturbation , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[10]  H. Sakata,et al.  Neural mechanisms of visual guidance of hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Postural Hand Synergies for Tool Use , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Gradual molding of the hand to object contours. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The organization of the cortical motor system: new concepts. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  E. Brenner,et al.  A new view on grasping. , 1999, Motor control.

[16]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  A test between two hypotheses and a possible third way for the control of prehension , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Force synergies for multifingered grasping , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  H. Sakata,et al.  Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  K. Newell,et al.  Body-scaled transitions in human grip configurations. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Two virtual fingers in the control of the tripod grasp. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  S. Chieffi,et al.  The role of proprioception in the control of prehension movements: a kinematic study in a peripherally deafferented patient and in normal subjects , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Coordinated responses following mechanical perturbation of the arm during prehension , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  S. Chieffi,et al.  Coordination between the transport and the grasp components during prehension movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Dissociating visual and kinesthetic coordinates during pointing movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.