Estimating mean field residue cover on midwestern soils using satellite imagery.

Knowledge of residue cover is crucial for targeting conservation efforts to reduce soil erosion, runoff, and associated environmental impacts ; however, a rapid, accurate, inexpensive methodology is not currently available. Previous studies have shown mixed results detecting crop residue using Landsat residue indices, but conditions generally included poor soil color contrast, emergent vegetation, or categorized residue cover. Our objectives were to evaluate a new normalized difference residue index (NDRI), along with other indices, over multiple image dates in 2005 and 2006 on dark soils in north-central Iowa. An automated method for field boundary delineation was used. The NDRI, using Landsat Bands 3 and 7, performed best overall, explaining 81% of the residue cover differences overall, 78% before emergence, and 9% after emergence. The normalized difference tillage index (NDTI), using Landsat Bands 5 and 7, also performed well explaining 68% of the variation overall, 86% before emergence, and 6% after emergence. Introduction of an empirical correction of the influence of green vegetation improved index performance. The NDTI outperformed the NDRI after green vegetation correction, explaining 67% of the variation versus 63%. The NDTI also returned the best RMSE (0.11) under preemergence conditions, and 0.15 after green vegetation correction. Generally, indices utilizing Landsat Band 7, which contain lignin and cellulose absorption bands absent in soil, returned the best residue detection results. Indices utilizing Landsat Band 4, where the reflectance of green vegetation is high, had difficulty detecting residue cover, especially after plant emergence.

[1]  J. M. Laflen,et al.  Measuring crop residue cover , 1981 .

[2]  Rick L. Lawrence,et al.  Predicting tillage practices and agricultural soil disturbance in north central Montana with Landsat imagery , 2006 .

[3]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[4]  Prasanna H. Gowda,et al.  Using Thematic Mapper Data to Identify Contrasting Soil Plains and Tillage Practices , 1997 .

[5]  A. J. Stern,et al.  Remote sensing of crop residue cover and soil tillage intensity , 2006 .

[6]  A. R. Jarrett,et al.  RUNOFF AND EROSION RATES FROM SLIT, CONVENTIONAL, AND CHISEL TILLAGE UNDER SIMULATED RAINFALL , 1990 .

[7]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Crop residue estimation using multiband reflectance , 1997 .

[8]  Gary A. Peterson,et al.  Tillage system and crop rotation effects on dryland crop yields and soil carbon in the central Great Plains , 2002 .

[9]  C. Daughtry,et al.  Mitigating the effects of soil and residue water contents on remotely sensed estimates of crop residue cover , 2008 .

[10]  Jiaguo Qi,et al.  RANGES improves satellite-based information and land cover assessments in southwest United States , 2002 .

[11]  J. E. Morrison,et al.  Sources of Variation and Performance of Nine Devices When Measuring Percent Residue Cover , 1995 .

[12]  Albert J. Peters,et al.  Use of Multispectral Ikonos Imagery for Discriminating between Conventional and Conservation Agricultural Tillage Practices , 2003 .

[13]  Ferdinand Bonn,et al.  Evaluation of soil erosion protective cover by crop residues using vegetation indices and spectral mixture analysis of multispectral and hyperspectral data , 2005 .

[14]  Craig S. T. Daughtry,et al.  Discriminating Crop Residues from Soil by Shortwave Infrared Reflectance , 2001 .

[15]  James E. McMurtrey,et al.  Remote sensing the spatial distribution of crop residues , 2005 .

[16]  Rick L. Lawrence,et al.  Documenting no-till and conventional till practices using Landsat ETM+ imagery and logistic regression , 2002 .

[17]  Prasanna H. Gowda,et al.  Mapping tillage practices with landstat thematic mapper based logistic regression models , 2001 .

[18]  Automated determination of management units for precision conservation , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[19]  D. Karlen,et al.  Quantification of tillage and landscape effects on soil carbon in small Iowa watersheds , 2004 .

[20]  C. L. Wiegand,et al.  Reflectance Differences Between Crop Residues and Bare Soils 1 , 1975 .

[21]  Marvin E. Bauer,et al.  Evaluation of optical remote sensing models for crop residue cover assessment , 2004 .

[22]  H. Mcnairn,et al.  Mapping Corn Residue Cover on Agricultural Fields in Oxford County, Ontario, Using Thematic Mapper , 1993 .

[23]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction , 2002 .

[24]  Clint C. Truman,et al.  Evaluating Techniques for Determining Tillage Regime in the Southeastern Coastal Plain and Piedmont , 2006 .

[25]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Environmental and Economic Costs of Soil Erosion and Conservation Benefits , 1995, Science.

[26]  C. Daughtry,et al.  Plant Litter and Soil Reflectance , 2000 .