Combining docking and molecular dynamic simulations in drug design

A rational approach is needed to maximize the chances of finding new drugs, and to exploit the opportunities of potential new drug targets emerging from genomic and proteomic initiatives, and from the large libraries of small compounds now readily available through combinatorial chemistry. Despite a shaky early history, computer‐aided drug design techniques can now be effective in reducing costs and speeding up drug discovery. This happy outcome results from development of more accurate and reliable algorithms, use of more thoughtfully planned strategies to apply them, and greatly increased computer power to allow studies with the necessary reliability to be performed. Our review focuses on applications and protocols, with the main emphasis on critical analysis of recent studies where docking calculations and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were combined to dock small molecules into protein receptors. We highlight successes to demonstrate what is possible now, but also point out drawbacks and future directions. The review is structured to lead the reader from the simpler to more compute‐intensive methods. Thus, while inexpensive and fast docking algorithms can be used to scan large compound libraries and reduce their size, more accurate but expensive MD simulations can be applied when a few selected ligand candidates remain. MD simulations can be used: during the preparation of the protein receptor before docking, to optimize its structure and account for protein flexibility; for the refinement of docked complexes, to include solvent effects and account for induced fit; to calculate binding free energies, to provide an accurate ranking of the potential ligands; and in the latest developments, during the docking process itself to find the binding site and correctly dock the ligand a priori. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Med Res Rev, 26, No. 5, 531–568, 2006

[1]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding funnels and binding mechanisms. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[2]  Martin Almlöf,et al.  Free energy calculations and ligand binding. , 2003, Advances in protein chemistry.

[3]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  J. Drews Stategic trends in the drug industry. , 2003, Drug discovery today.

[5]  P A Kollman,et al.  Ranking ligand binding affinities with avidin: a molecular dynamics‐based interaction energy study , 1999, Proteins.

[6]  A. di Nola,et al.  Docking of flexible ligands to flexible receptors in solution by molecular dynamics simulation , 1999, Proteins.

[7]  L Wang,et al.  Molecular dynamics and free-energy calculations applied to affinity maturation in antibody 48G7. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Todd J. A. Ewing,et al.  Critical evaluation of search algorithms for automated molecular docking and database screening , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[10]  Laxmikant V. Kale,et al.  NAMD2: Greater Scalability for Parallel Molecular Dynamics , 1999 .

[11]  Federico Fogolari,et al.  Comparative molecular dynamics simulations of HIV‐1 integrase and the T66I/M154I mutant: Binding modes and drug resistance to a diketo acid inhibitor , 2005, Proteins.

[12]  Andrew E. Torda,et al.  The GROMOS biomolecular simulation program package , 1999 .

[13]  L. Kuhn,et al.  Virtual screening with solvation and ligand-induced complementarity , 2000 .

[14]  A. Laio,et al.  Escaping free-energy minima , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  K. Tai Conformational sampling for the impatient. , 2004, Biophysical chemistry.

[16]  D. Rognan,et al.  Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[17]  B. Kuhn,et al.  Validation and use of the MM-PBSA approach for drug discovery. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[18]  I. Muegge Selection criteria for drug‐like compounds , 2003, Medicinal research reviews.

[19]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding and binding cascades: Dynamic landscapes and population shifts , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[20]  Y. Martin,et al.  A bioavailability score. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[21]  Jill E. Gready,et al.  Comparison of electrostatic potential around proteins calculated from Amber and AM1 charges: application to mutants of prion protein , 2003 .

[22]  K. Houk,et al.  Experimental determination of the absolute enantioselectivity of an antibody-catalyzed Diels-Alder reaction and theoretical explorations of the origins of stereoselectivity. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[23]  Ming Lei,et al.  Sampling protein conformations and pathways , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[24]  Brian K Shoichet,et al.  Testing a flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  New methodologies for ligand-based virtual screening. , 2005, Current pharmaceutical design.

[26]  P Willett,et al.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  R. Ornstein,et al.  Binding free energy calculations for P450cam-substrate complexes. , 1996, Protein engineering.

[28]  Peter L. Cummins,et al.  Multiple ligand-binding modes in bacterial R67 dihydrofolate reductase , 2005, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[29]  K. Sharp,et al.  Accurate Calculation of Hydration Free Energies Using Macroscopic Solvent Models , 1994 .

[30]  B. Tidor Molecular dynamics simulations , 1997, Current Biology.

[31]  I. Muegge,et al.  Simple selection criteria for drug-like chemical matter. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[32]  C Cambillau,et al.  Model of a complex between the tetrahemic cytochrome c3 and the ferredoxin I from Desulfovibrio desulfuricans (Norway strain) , 1988, Proteins.

[33]  Thomas M Frimurer,et al.  Ligand-induced conformational changes: improved predictions of ligand binding conformations and affinities. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[34]  Lahana,et al.  How many leads from HTS? , 1999, Drug discovery today.

[35]  A. Ortiz,et al.  Evaluation of docking functions for protein-ligand docking. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[36]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Conformational sampling by NMR solution structures calculated with the program DIANA evaluated by comparison with long‐time molecular dynamics calculations in explicit water , 1996, Proteins.

[37]  A. Laio,et al.  Flexible docking in solution using metadynamics. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[38]  J M Blaney,et al.  A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  Harold A. Scheraga,et al.  Prodock: Software package for protein modeling and docking , 1999, J. Comput. Chem..

[40]  D. Kostrewa,et al.  Novel inhibitors of DNA gyrase: 3D structure based biased needle screening, hit validation by biophysical methods, and 3D guided optimization. A promising alternative to random screening. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[41]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Binding affinities for sulfonamide inhibitors with human thrombin using Monte Carlo simulations with a linear response method. , 1997, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[42]  Ferran Sanz,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Putative Agonist‐Binding Modes in the Human A1 Adenosine Receptor , 2004, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[43]  Jie Hu,et al.  Technological Advances in High-Throughput Screening , 2004, American journal of pharmacogenomics : genomics-related research in drug development and clinical practice.

[44]  I. Luque,et al.  Structural stability of binding sites: Consequences for binding affinity and allosteric effects , 2000, Proteins.

[45]  Piotr Cieplak,et al.  Molecular dynamics and free energy analyses of cathepsin D-inhibitor interactions: insight into structure-based ligand design. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[46]  Djamal Bouzida,et al.  Complexity and simplicity of ligand-macromolecule interactions: the energy landscape perspective. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[47]  Andrew E. Torda,et al.  Local elevation: A method for improving the searching properties of molecular dynamics simulation , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[48]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Assessing energy functions for flexible docking , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..

[49]  Johan Åqvist,et al.  Binding affinity prediction with different force fields: Examination of the linear interaction energy method , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[50]  M. Karplus,et al.  Dynamics of folded proteins , 1977, Nature.

[51]  A. Kidera,et al.  Multicanonical Ensemble Generated by Molecular Dynamics Simulation for Enhanced Conformational Sampling of Peptides , 1997 .

[52]  J. Irwin,et al.  Lead discovery using molecular docking. , 2002, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[53]  P. Kollman,et al.  Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. , 1998, Science.

[54]  Eric J. Sorin,et al.  How well can simulation predict protein folding kinetics and thermodynamics? , 2005, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[55]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5179−5197 , 1996 .

[56]  J. Berg,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[57]  Alexander D. MacKerell Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: Overview and issues , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[58]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Rapid protein–ligand docking using soft modes from molecular dynamics simulations to account for protein deformability: Binding of FK506 to FKBP , 2004, Proteins.

[59]  R. Schulz,et al.  Protein Structure Prediction , 2020, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[60]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Structure and internal dynamics of the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor in aqueous solution from long‐time molecular dynamics simulations , 1995, Proteins.

[61]  P. Kollman,et al.  Continuum Solvent Studies of the Stability of DNA, RNA, and Phosphoramidate−DNA Helices , 1998 .

[62]  R. Hertzberg,et al.  High-throughput screening: new technology for the 21st century. , 2000, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[63]  Alistair P. Rendell,et al.  Electronic effects in biomolecular simulations: Investigation of the KcsA potassium ion channel , 2004 .

[64]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Studying enzyme binding specificity in acetylcholinesterase using a combined molecular dynamics and multiple docking approach. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[65]  P. Kollman,et al.  Investigating the binding specificity of U1A-RNA by computational mutagenesis. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[66]  Harren Jhoti,et al.  High-throughput crystallography for lead discovery in drug design , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[67]  Hege S. Beard,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[68]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Flexible ligand docking: A multistep strategy approach , 1999, Proteins.

[69]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Identification of ligands for RNA targets via structure-based virtual screening: HIV-1 TAR , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[70]  I D Kuntz,et al.  Structure-based design and combinatorial chemistry yield low nanomolar inhibitors of cathepsin D. , 1997, Chemistry & biology.

[71]  Richard H. Henchman,et al.  Revisiting free energy calculations: a theoretical connection to MM/PBSA and direct calculation of the association free energy. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[72]  Renxiao Wang,et al.  Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[73]  Natasja Brooijmans,et al.  Molecular recognition and docking algorithms. , 2003, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[74]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .

[75]  F. Österberg,et al.  Exploring blocker binding to a homology model of the open hERG K+ channel using docking and molecular dynamics methods , 2005, FEBS letters.

[76]  M. Congreve,et al.  A 'rule of three' for fragment-based lead discovery? , 2003, Drug discovery today.

[77]  Hwangseo Park,et al.  Free energy perturbation approach to the critical assessment of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors , 2005, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[78]  P. A. Bash,et al.  Calculation of the relative change in binding free energy of a protein-inhibitor complex. , 1987, Science.

[79]  D. J. Price,et al.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[80]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  A hybrid method of molecular dynamics and harmonic dynamics for docking of flexible ligand to flexible receptor , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[81]  J. Tainer,et al.  Screening a peptidyl database for potential ligands to proteins with side‐chain flexibility , 1998, Proteins.

[82]  Palmer Taylor,et al.  Curariform Antagonists Bind in Different Orientations to Acetylcholine-binding Protein* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[83]  P. Kollman,et al.  Computational Alanine Scanning To Probe Protein−Protein Interactions: A Novel Approach To Evaluate Binding Free Energies , 1999 .

[84]  M. Zvelebil,et al.  Novel inhibitors of Trypanosoma cruzi dihydrofolate reductase. , 2001, European journal of medicinal chemistry.

[85]  David A Pearlman,et al.  Evaluating the molecular mechanics poisson-boltzmann surface area free energy method using a congeneric series of ligands to p38 MAP kinase. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[86]  D. Beveridge,et al.  Free energy via molecular simulation: applications to chemical and biomolecular systems. , 1989, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[87]  M L Lamb,et al.  Prediction of binding affinities for TIBO inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase using Monte Carlo simulations in a linear response method. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[88]  D. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking to multiple target structures: Incorporation of protein mobility and structural water heterogeneity in AutoDock , 2002, Proteins.

[89]  J. Evanseck,et al.  Functional Significance of Hierarchical Tiers in Carbonmonoxy Myoglobin: Conformational Substates and Transitions Studied by Conformational Flooding Simulations , 2000 .

[90]  G. Superti-Furga,et al.  Rediscovering the sweet spot in drug discovery. , 2003, Drug discovery today.

[91]  Amedeo Caflisch,et al.  Docking small ligands in flexible binding sites , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..

[92]  S. Diekmann,et al.  Molecular Basis of the Interaction Specificity between the Human Glucocorticoid Receptor and Its Endogenous Steroid Ligand Cortisol , 2005, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[93]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Access the most recent version at doi: 10.1110/ps.21302 References , 2001 .

[94]  V. Hornak,et al.  Dynamics of Rnase Sa: A simulation perspective complementary to NMR/X-ray , 2002 .

[95]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..

[96]  J. Aqvist,et al.  A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design. , 1994, Protein engineering.

[97]  R. Villar,et al.  Are AM1 ligand‐protein binding enthalpies good enough for use in the rational design of new drugs? , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[98]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  Virtual screening of chemical libraries , 2004, Nature.

[99]  J. Åqvist,et al.  Ligand binding affinities from MD simulations. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.

[100]  Markus Meuwly,et al.  Investigation of glucose binding sites on insulin , 2004, Proteins.

[101]  K. Merz,et al.  Large-scale validation of a quantum mechanics based scoring function: predicting the binding affinity and the binding mode of a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[102]  F. Österberg,et al.  Structure–activity relationship for extracellular block of K+ channels by tetraalkylammonium ions , 2003, FEBS letters.

[103]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Soft protein–protein docking in internal coordinates , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[104]  Carlos Pérez,et al.  Automated docking and molecular dynamics simulations of nimesulide in the cyclooxygenase active site of human prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase-2 (COX-2) , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[105]  E. Jaeger,et al.  Comparison of automated docking programs as virtual screening tools. , 2005, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

[106]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  Combinatorial docking and combinatorial chemistry: Design of potent non-peptide thrombin inhibitors , 1999, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[107]  M. Mizutani,et al.  Discovery of novel aldose reductase inhibitors using a protein structure-based approach: 3D-database search followed by design and synthesis. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[108]  Jonathan W. Essex,et al.  A review of protein-small molecule docking methods , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[109]  P Burkhard,et al.  The discovery of steroids and other novel FKBP inhibitors using a molecular docking program. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[110]  Kirsch,et al.  Virtual Screening for Bioactive Molecules by Evolutionary De Novo Design Special thanks to Neil R. Taylor for his help in preparation of the manuscript. , 2000, Angewandte Chemie.

[111]  R. Elber,et al.  Computational studies of ligand diffusion in globins: I. Leghemoglobin , 1991, Proteins.

[112]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions , 2002, Proteins.

[113]  Richard A. Lewis,et al.  Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[114]  J. Ponder,et al.  Force fields for protein simulations. , 2003, Advances in protein chemistry.

[115]  M. Philippopoulos,et al.  Exploring the dynamic information content of a protein NMR structure: Comparison of a molecular dynamics simulation with the NMR and X‐ray structures of Escherichia coli ribonuclease HI , 1999, Proteins.

[116]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[117]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  NAMD: a Parallel, Object-Oriented Molecular Dynamics Program , 1996, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..

[118]  I. Enyedy,et al.  Discovery of small-molecule inhibitors of Bcl-2 through structure-based computer screening. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[119]  Anna Tramontano,et al.  Assessment of homology‐based predictions in CASP5 , 2003, Proteins.

[120]  H. Kubinyi Drug research: myths, hype and reality , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[121]  Manuel C. Peitsch,et al.  SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[122]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[123]  M. Murcko,et al.  Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[124]  Hwangseo Park,et al.  Loop Flexibility and Solvent Dynamics as Determinants for the Selective Inhibition of Cyclin‐Dependent Kinase 4: Comparative Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies of CDK2 and CDK4 , 2004, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[125]  P. Kollman,et al.  Use of MM-PBSA in reproducing the binding free energies to HIV-1 RT of TIBO derivatives and predicting the binding mode to HIV-1 RT of efavirenz by docking and MM-PBSA. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[126]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[127]  Alistair P. Rendell,et al.  The Potassium Ion Channel: Comparison of Linear Scaling Semiempirical and Molecular Mechanics Representations of the Electrostatic Potential , 2001 .

[128]  Ajay N. Jain,et al.  Virtual screening in lead discovery and optimization. , 2004, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[129]  P A Kollman,et al.  What determines the van der Waals coefficient β in the LIE (linear interaction energy) method to estimate binding free energies using molecular dynamics simulations? , 1999, Proteins.

[130]  T. Hansson,et al.  Estimation of binding free energies for HIV proteinase inhibitors by molecular dynamics simulations. , 1995, Protein engineering.

[131]  Tom L. Blundell,et al.  Keynote review: Structural biology and drug discovery , 2005 .

[132]  David E. Clark,et al.  Chapter 10 Computational Prediction of ADMET Properties: Recent Developments and Future Challenges , 2005 .

[133]  P. Kollman,et al.  Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.

[134]  Youngshang Pak,et al.  Application of a Molecular Dynamics Simulation Method with a Generalized Effective Potential to the Flexible Molecular Docking Problems , 2000 .

[135]  J. Apostolakis,et al.  Exhaustive docking of molecular fragments with electrostatic solvation , 1999, Proteins.

[136]  Victor Guallar,et al.  Importance of accurate charges in molecular docking: Quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) approach , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[137]  V. Luzhkov,et al.  Mechanisms of tetraethylammonium ion block in the KcsA potassium channel , 2001, FEBS letters.

[138]  C. Tsallis Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics , 1988 .

[139]  C. Tsallis,et al.  Generalized statistical mechanics : connection with thermodynamics , 1991 .

[140]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Detailed analysis of grid‐based molecular docking: A case study of CDOCKER—A CHARMm‐based MD docking algorithm , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[141]  Tudor I. Oprea,et al.  Pursuing the leadlikeness concept in pharmaceutical research. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[142]  Johan Åqvist,et al.  Calculation of absolute binding free energies for charged ligands and effects of long‐range electrostatic interactions , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[143]  B. L. de Groot,et al.  Water Permeation Across Biological Membranes: Mechanism and Dynamics of Aquaporin-1 and GlpF , 2001, Science.

[144]  Ronald M. Welch,et al.  Climatic Impact of Tropical Lowland Deforestation on Nearby Montane Cloud Forests , 2001, Science.

[145]  Maria Cristina Gamberini,et al.  Discovery of new inhibitors of aldose reductase from molecular docking and database screening. , 2002, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[146]  Christopher W. Murray,et al.  The sensitivity of the results of molecular docking to induced fit effects: Application to thrombin, thermolysin and neuraminidase , 1999, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[147]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[148]  A. Leach,et al.  Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[149]  P. Kollman,et al.  Binding of a diverse set of ligands to avidin and streptavidin: an accurate quantitative prediction of their relative affinities by a combination of molecular mechanics and continuum solvent models. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[150]  Lennart Nilsson,et al.  Advances in biomolecular simulations: methodology and recent applications , 2003, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[151]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[152]  Philip M Dean,et al.  Efficient conformational sampling of local side-chain flexibility. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[153]  H. Broughton,et al.  A method for including protein flexibility in protein-ligand docking: improving tools for database mining and virtual screening. , 2000, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[154]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Adenosine analogues as selective inhibitors of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase of Trypanosomatidae via structure-based drug design. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[155]  P. Kollman,et al.  Biomolecular simulations: recent developments in force fields, simulations of enzyme catalysis, protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-nucleic acid noncovalent interactions. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[156]  Jung-Hsin Lin,et al.  The relaxed complex method: Accommodating receptor flexibility for drug design with an improved scoring scheme. , 2003, Biopolymers.

[157]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[158]  J. Andrew McCammon,et al.  Method for Including the Dynamic Fluctuations of a Protein in Computer-Aided Drug Design , 1999 .

[159]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Computational drug design accommodating receptor flexibility: the relaxed complex scheme. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[160]  K. Fukasawa,et al.  Structure-based generation of a new class of potent Cdk4 inhibitors: new de novo design strategy and library design. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[161]  A. Caflisch,et al.  Efficient electrostatic solvation model for protein‐fragment docking , 2001, Proteins.

[162]  Jyh-Ping Hsu,et al.  Recent developments in structural proteomics for protein structure determination , 2005, Proteomics.

[163]  Dusanka Janezic,et al.  Harmonic analysis of large systems. I. Methodology , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[164]  P. Goodford A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. , 1985, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[165]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Discovery of a novel binding trench in HIV integrase. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[166]  T Lengauer,et al.  Two-stage method for protein-ligand docking. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[167]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  AN EXTENDED LINEAR RESPONSE METHOD FOR DETERMINING FREE ENERGIES OF HYDRATION , 1995 .

[168]  G Klebe,et al.  Docking ligands onto binding site representations derived from proteins built by homology modelling. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[169]  F. Bushman,et al.  Developing a dynamic pharmacophore model for HIV-1 integrase. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[170]  Johan Åqvist,et al.  Ligand binding affinity prediction by linear interaction energy methods , 1998, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[171]  John Moult,et al.  A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[172]  Maurizio Recanatini,et al.  A computational study of the binding of propidium to the peripheral anionic site of human acetylcholinesterase. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[173]  J. Åqvist,et al.  The linear interaction energy method for predicting ligand binding free energies. , 2001, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[174]  Dusanka Janezic,et al.  Harmonic analysis of large systems. II. Comparison of different protein models , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[175]  Tudor I. Oprea,et al.  Integrating virtual screening in lead discovery. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[176]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[177]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[178]  Dusanka Janezic,et al.  Harmonic analysis of large systems. III. Comparison with molecular dynamics , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[179]  Hwangseo Park,et al.  Homology modeling, force field design, and free energy simulation studies to optimize the activities of histone deacetylase inhibitors , 2004, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[180]  W. Sippl,et al.  Glucocorticoid receptor interactions with glucocorticoids: evaluation by molecular modeling and functional analysis of glucocorticoid receptor mutants , 2003, Steroids.

[181]  Petra Schneider,et al.  De novo design of molecular architectures by evolutionary assembly of drug-derived building blocks , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[182]  M. Karplus,et al.  Functionality maps of binding sites: A multiple copy simultaneous search method , 1991, Proteins.

[183]  Shaomeng Wang,et al.  An Extensive Test of 14 Scoring Functions Using the PDBbind Refined Set of 800 Protein-Ligand Complexes , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[184]  J. Åqvist,et al.  Q: a molecular dynamics program for free energy calculations and empirical valence bond simulations in biomolecular systems. , 1998, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[185]  T. Blundell,et al.  Structural biology and drug discovery. , 2005, Drug discovery today.

[186]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Flexible docking of a ligand peptide to a receptor protein by multicanonical molecular dynamics simulation , 1997 .

[187]  Berk Hess,et al.  GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis , 2001 .

[188]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Studying the roles of W86, E202, and Y337 in binding of acetylcholine to acetylcholinesterase using a combined molecular dynamics and multiple docking approach , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[189]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[190]  Vladislav Vasilyev,et al.  Application of semiempirical quantum chemical methods as a scoring function in docking , 2004 .

[191]  P. Kollman,et al.  Combined molecular mechanical and continuum solvent approach (MM-PBSA/GBSA) to predict ligand binding , 2000 .

[192]  R. Clark,et al.  Consensus scoring for ligand/protein interactions. , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.