Combining docking and molecular dynamic simulations in drug design
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Nussinov,et al. Folding funnels and binding mechanisms. , 1999, Protein engineering.
[2] Martin Almlöf,et al. Free energy calculations and ligand binding. , 2003, Advances in protein chemistry.
[3] T. Blundell,et al. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.
[4] J. Drews. Stategic trends in the drug industry. , 2003, Drug discovery today.
[5] P A Kollman,et al. Ranking ligand binding affinities with avidin: a molecular dynamics‐based interaction energy study , 1999, Proteins.
[6] A. di Nola,et al. Docking of flexible ligands to flexible receptors in solution by molecular dynamics simulation , 1999, Proteins.
[7] L Wang,et al. Molecular dynamics and free-energy calculations applied to affinity maturation in antibody 48G7. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[8] Todd J. A. Ewing,et al. Critical evaluation of search algorithms for automated molecular docking and database screening , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..
[9] B. Shoichet,et al. Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[10] Laxmikant V. Kale,et al. NAMD2: Greater Scalability for Parallel Molecular Dynamics , 1999 .
[11] Federico Fogolari,et al. Comparative molecular dynamics simulations of HIV‐1 integrase and the T66I/M154I mutant: Binding modes and drug resistance to a diketo acid inhibitor , 2005, Proteins.
[12] Andrew E. Torda,et al. The GROMOS biomolecular simulation program package , 1999 .
[13] L. Kuhn,et al. Virtual screening with solvation and ligand-induced complementarity , 2000 .
[14] A. Laio,et al. Escaping free-energy minima , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[15] K. Tai. Conformational sampling for the impatient. , 2004, Biophysical chemistry.
[16] D. Rognan,et al. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[17] B. Kuhn,et al. Validation and use of the MM-PBSA approach for drug discovery. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[18] I. Muegge. Selection criteria for drug‐like compounds , 2003, Medicinal research reviews.
[19] R. Nussinov,et al. Folding and binding cascades: Dynamic landscapes and population shifts , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[20] Y. Martin,et al. A bioavailability score. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[21] Jill E. Gready,et al. Comparison of electrostatic potential around proteins calculated from Amber and AM1 charges: application to mutants of prion protein , 2003 .
[22] K. Houk,et al. Experimental determination of the absolute enantioselectivity of an antibody-catalyzed Diels-Alder reaction and theoretical explorations of the origins of stereoselectivity. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[23] Ming Lei,et al. Sampling protein conformations and pathways , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..
[24] Brian K Shoichet,et al. Testing a flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[25] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. New methodologies for ligand-based virtual screening. , 2005, Current pharmaceutical design.
[26] P Willett,et al. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[27] R. Ornstein,et al. Binding free energy calculations for P450cam-substrate complexes. , 1996, Protein engineering.
[28] Peter L. Cummins,et al. Multiple ligand-binding modes in bacterial R67 dihydrofolate reductase , 2005, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[29] K. Sharp,et al. Accurate Calculation of Hydration Free Energies Using Macroscopic Solvent Models , 1994 .
[30] B. Tidor. Molecular dynamics simulations , 1997, Current Biology.
[31] I. Muegge,et al. Simple selection criteria for drug-like chemical matter. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[32] C Cambillau,et al. Model of a complex between the tetrahemic cytochrome c3 and the ferredoxin I from Desulfovibrio desulfuricans (Norway strain) , 1988, Proteins.
[33] Thomas M Frimurer,et al. Ligand-induced conformational changes: improved predictions of ligand binding conformations and affinities. , 2003, Biophysical journal.
[34] Lahana,et al. How many leads from HTS? , 1999, Drug discovery today.
[35] A. Ortiz,et al. Evaluation of docking functions for protein-ligand docking. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[36] K. Wüthrich,et al. Conformational sampling by NMR solution structures calculated with the program DIANA evaluated by comparison with long‐time molecular dynamics calculations in explicit water , 1996, Proteins.
[37] A. Laio,et al. Flexible docking in solution using metadynamics. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[38] J M Blaney,et al. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.
[39] Harold A. Scheraga,et al. Prodock: Software package for protein modeling and docking , 1999, J. Comput. Chem..
[40] D. Kostrewa,et al. Novel inhibitors of DNA gyrase: 3D structure based biased needle screening, hit validation by biophysical methods, and 3D guided optimization. A promising alternative to random screening. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[41] W. L. Jorgensen,et al. Binding affinities for sulfonamide inhibitors with human thrombin using Monte Carlo simulations with a linear response method. , 1997, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[42] Ferran Sanz,et al. Comparative Analysis of Putative Agonist‐Binding Modes in the Human A1 Adenosine Receptor , 2004, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.
[43] Jie Hu,et al. Technological Advances in High-Throughput Screening , 2004, American journal of pharmacogenomics : genomics-related research in drug development and clinical practice.
[44] I. Luque,et al. Structural stability of binding sites: Consequences for binding affinity and allosteric effects , 2000, Proteins.
[45] Piotr Cieplak,et al. Molecular dynamics and free energy analyses of cathepsin D-inhibitor interactions: insight into structure-based ligand design. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[46] Djamal Bouzida,et al. Complexity and simplicity of ligand-macromolecule interactions: the energy landscape perspective. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.
[47] Andrew E. Torda,et al. Local elevation: A method for improving the searching properties of molecular dynamics simulation , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[48] Charles L. Brooks,et al. Assessing energy functions for flexible docking , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..
[49] Johan Åqvist,et al. Binding affinity prediction with different force fields: Examination of the linear interaction energy method , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..
[50] M. Karplus,et al. Dynamics of folded proteins , 1977, Nature.
[51] A. Kidera,et al. Multicanonical Ensemble Generated by Molecular Dynamics Simulation for Enhanced Conformational Sampling of Peptides , 1997 .
[52] J. Irwin,et al. Lead discovery using molecular docking. , 2002, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[53] P. Kollman,et al. Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. , 1998, Science.
[54] Eric J. Sorin,et al. How well can simulation predict protein folding kinetics and thermodynamics? , 2005, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.
[55] P. Kollman,et al. A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5179−5197 , 1996 .
[56] J. Berg,et al. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.
[57] Alexander D. MacKerell. Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: Overview and issues , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..
[58] Martin Zacharias,et al. Rapid protein–ligand docking using soft modes from molecular dynamics simulations to account for protein deformability: Binding of FK506 to FKBP , 2004, Proteins.
[59] R. Schulz,et al. Protein Structure Prediction , 2020, Methods in Molecular Biology.
[60] K. Wüthrich,et al. Structure and internal dynamics of the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor in aqueous solution from long‐time molecular dynamics simulations , 1995, Proteins.
[61] P. Kollman,et al. Continuum Solvent Studies of the Stability of DNA, RNA, and Phosphoramidate−DNA Helices , 1998 .
[62] R. Hertzberg,et al. High-throughput screening: new technology for the 21st century. , 2000, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[63] Alistair P. Rendell,et al. Electronic effects in biomolecular simulations: Investigation of the KcsA potassium ion channel , 2004 .
[64] J Andrew McCammon,et al. Studying enzyme binding specificity in acetylcholinesterase using a combined molecular dynamics and multiple docking approach. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[65] P. Kollman,et al. Investigating the binding specificity of U1A-RNA by computational mutagenesis. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.
[66] Harren Jhoti,et al. High-throughput crystallography for lead discovery in drug design , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[67] Hege S. Beard,et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[68] I. Kuntz,et al. Flexible ligand docking: A multistep strategy approach , 1999, Proteins.
[69] Ruben Abagyan,et al. Identification of ligands for RNA targets via structure-based virtual screening: HIV-1 TAR , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[70] I D Kuntz,et al. Structure-based design and combinatorial chemistry yield low nanomolar inhibitors of cathepsin D. , 1997, Chemistry & biology.
[71] Richard H. Henchman,et al. Revisiting free energy calculations: a theoretical connection to MM/PBSA and direct calculation of the association free energy. , 2004, Biophysical journal.
[72] Renxiao Wang,et al. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[73] Natasja Brooijmans,et al. Molecular recognition and docking algorithms. , 2003, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.
[74] Y. Sugita,et al. Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .
[75] F. Österberg,et al. Exploring blocker binding to a homology model of the open hERG K+ channel using docking and molecular dynamics methods , 2005, FEBS letters.
[76] M. Congreve,et al. A 'rule of three' for fragment-based lead discovery? , 2003, Drug discovery today.
[77] Hwangseo Park,et al. Free energy perturbation approach to the critical assessment of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors , 2005, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[78] P. A. Bash,et al. Calculation of the relative change in binding free energy of a protein-inhibitor complex. , 1987, Science.
[79] D. J. Price,et al. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[80] Haruki Nakamura,et al. A hybrid method of molecular dynamics and harmonic dynamics for docking of flexible ligand to flexible receptor , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..
[81] J. Tainer,et al. Screening a peptidyl database for potential ligands to proteins with side‐chain flexibility , 1998, Proteins.
[82] Palmer Taylor,et al. Curariform Antagonists Bind in Different Orientations to Acetylcholine-binding Protein* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[83] P. Kollman,et al. Computational Alanine Scanning To Probe Protein−Protein Interactions: A Novel Approach To Evaluate Binding Free Energies , 1999 .
[84] M. Zvelebil,et al. Novel inhibitors of Trypanosoma cruzi dihydrofolate reductase. , 2001, European journal of medicinal chemistry.
[85] David A Pearlman,et al. Evaluating the molecular mechanics poisson-boltzmann surface area free energy method using a congeneric series of ligands to p38 MAP kinase. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[86] D. Beveridge,et al. Free energy via molecular simulation: applications to chemical and biomolecular systems. , 1989, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.
[87] M L Lamb,et al. Prediction of binding affinities for TIBO inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase using Monte Carlo simulations in a linear response method. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[88] D. Goodsell,et al. Automated docking to multiple target structures: Incorporation of protein mobility and structural water heterogeneity in AutoDock , 2002, Proteins.
[89] J. Evanseck,et al. Functional Significance of Hierarchical Tiers in Carbonmonoxy Myoglobin: Conformational Substates and Transitions Studied by Conformational Flooding Simulations , 2000 .
[90] G. Superti-Furga,et al. Rediscovering the sweet spot in drug discovery. , 2003, Drug discovery today.
[91] Amedeo Caflisch,et al. Docking small ligands in flexible binding sites , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..
[92] S. Diekmann,et al. Molecular Basis of the Interaction Specificity between the Human Glucocorticoid Receptor and Its Endogenous Steroid Ligand Cortisol , 2005, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.
[93] H. Wolfson,et al. Access the most recent version at doi: 10.1110/ps.21302 References , 2001 .
[94] V. Hornak,et al. Dynamics of Rnase Sa: A simulation perspective complementary to NMR/X-ray , 2002 .
[95] David S. Goodsell,et al. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..
[96] J. Aqvist,et al. A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design. , 1994, Protein engineering.
[97] R. Villar,et al. Are AM1 ligand‐protein binding enthalpies good enough for use in the rational design of new drugs? , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..
[98] Brian K. Shoichet,et al. Virtual screening of chemical libraries , 2004, Nature.
[99] J. Åqvist,et al. Ligand binding affinities from MD simulations. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.
[100] Markus Meuwly,et al. Investigation of glucose binding sites on insulin , 2004, Proteins.
[101] K. Merz,et al. Large-scale validation of a quantum mechanics based scoring function: predicting the binding affinity and the binding mode of a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[102] F. Österberg,et al. Structure–activity relationship for extracellular block of K+ channels by tetraalkylammonium ions , 2003, FEBS letters.
[103] R. Abagyan,et al. Soft protein–protein docking in internal coordinates , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[104] Carlos Pérez,et al. Automated docking and molecular dynamics simulations of nimesulide in the cyclooxygenase active site of human prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase-2 (COX-2) , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[105] E. Jaeger,et al. Comparison of automated docking programs as virtual screening tools. , 2005, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
[106] Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al. Combinatorial docking and combinatorial chemistry: Design of potent non-peptide thrombin inhibitors , 1999, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[107] M. Mizutani,et al. Discovery of novel aldose reductase inhibitors using a protein structure-based approach: 3D-database search followed by design and synthesis. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[108] Jonathan W. Essex,et al. A review of protein-small molecule docking methods , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[109] P Burkhard,et al. The discovery of steroids and other novel FKBP inhibitors using a molecular docking program. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.
[110] Kirsch,et al. Virtual Screening for Bioactive Molecules by Evolutionary De Novo Design Special thanks to Neil R. Taylor for his help in preparation of the manuscript. , 2000, Angewandte Chemie.
[111] R. Elber,et al. Computational studies of ligand diffusion in globins: I. Leghemoglobin , 1991, Proteins.
[112] Ruth Nussinov,et al. Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions , 2002, Proteins.
[113] Richard A. Lewis,et al. Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[114] J. Ponder,et al. Force fields for protein simulations. , 2003, Advances in protein chemistry.
[115] M. Philippopoulos,et al. Exploring the dynamic information content of a protein NMR structure: Comparison of a molecular dynamics simulation with the NMR and X‐ray structures of Escherichia coli ribonuclease HI , 1999, Proteins.
[116] B. Shoichet,et al. Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[117] Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al. NAMD: a Parallel, Object-Oriented Molecular Dynamics Program , 1996, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..
[118] I. Enyedy,et al. Discovery of small-molecule inhibitors of Bcl-2 through structure-based computer screening. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[119] Anna Tramontano,et al. Assessment of homology‐based predictions in CASP5 , 2003, Proteins.
[120] H. Kubinyi. Drug research: myths, hype and reality , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[121] Manuel C. Peitsch,et al. SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..
[122] J. Bajorath,et al. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[123] M. Murcko,et al. Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[124] Hwangseo Park,et al. Loop Flexibility and Solvent Dynamics as Determinants for the Selective Inhibition of Cyclin‐Dependent Kinase 4: Comparative Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies of CDK2 and CDK4 , 2004, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.
[125] P. Kollman,et al. Use of MM-PBSA in reproducing the binding free energies to HIV-1 RT of TIBO derivatives and predicting the binding mode to HIV-1 RT of efavirenz by docking and MM-PBSA. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[126] Thomas Lengauer,et al. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.
[127] Alistair P. Rendell,et al. The Potassium Ion Channel: Comparison of Linear Scaling Semiempirical and Molecular Mechanics Representations of the Electrostatic Potential , 2001 .
[128] Ajay N. Jain,et al. Virtual screening in lead discovery and optimization. , 2004, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.
[129] P A Kollman,et al. What determines the van der Waals coefficient β in the LIE (linear interaction energy) method to estimate binding free energies using molecular dynamics simulations? , 1999, Proteins.
[130] T. Hansson,et al. Estimation of binding free energies for HIV proteinase inhibitors by molecular dynamics simulations. , 1995, Protein engineering.
[131] Tom L. Blundell,et al. Keynote review: Structural biology and drug discovery , 2005 .
[132] David E. Clark,et al. Chapter 10 Computational Prediction of ADMET Properties: Recent Developments and Future Challenges , 2005 .
[133] P. Kollman,et al. Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.
[134] Youngshang Pak,et al. Application of a Molecular Dynamics Simulation Method with a Generalized Effective Potential to the Flexible Molecular Docking Problems , 2000 .
[135] J. Apostolakis,et al. Exhaustive docking of molecular fragments with electrostatic solvation , 1999, Proteins.
[136] Victor Guallar,et al. Importance of accurate charges in molecular docking: Quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) approach , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..
[137] V. Luzhkov,et al. Mechanisms of tetraethylammonium ion block in the KcsA potassium channel , 2001, FEBS letters.
[138] C. Tsallis. Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics , 1988 .
[139] C. Tsallis,et al. Generalized statistical mechanics : connection with thermodynamics , 1991 .
[140] Charles L. Brooks,et al. Detailed analysis of grid‐based molecular docking: A case study of CDOCKER—A CHARMm‐based MD docking algorithm , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..
[141] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Pursuing the leadlikeness concept in pharmaceutical research. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[142] Johan Åqvist,et al. Calculation of absolute binding free energies for charged ligands and effects of long‐range electrostatic interactions , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..
[143] B. L. de Groot,et al. Water Permeation Across Biological Membranes: Mechanism and Dynamics of Aquaporin-1 and GlpF , 2001, Science.
[144] Ronald M. Welch,et al. Climatic Impact of Tropical Lowland Deforestation on Nearby Montane Cloud Forests , 2001, Science.
[145] Maria Cristina Gamberini,et al. Discovery of new inhibitors of aldose reductase from molecular docking and database screening. , 2002, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.
[146] Christopher W. Murray,et al. The sensitivity of the results of molecular docking to induced fit effects: Application to thrombin, thermolysin and neuraminidase , 1999, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[147] I. Kuntz,et al. Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[148] A. Leach,et al. Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.
[149] P. Kollman,et al. Binding of a diverse set of ligands to avidin and streptavidin: an accurate quantitative prediction of their relative affinities by a combination of molecular mechanics and continuum solvent models. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[150] Lennart Nilsson,et al. Advances in biomolecular simulations: methodology and recent applications , 2003, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.
[151] P. Kollman,et al. A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .
[152] Philip M Dean,et al. Efficient conformational sampling of local side-chain flexibility. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[153] H. Broughton,et al. A method for including protein flexibility in protein-ligand docking: improving tools for database mining and virtual screening. , 2000, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[154] I. Kuntz,et al. Adenosine analogues as selective inhibitors of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase of Trypanosomatidae via structure-based drug design. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[155] P. Kollman,et al. Biomolecular simulations: recent developments in force fields, simulations of enzyme catalysis, protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-nucleic acid noncovalent interactions. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.
[156] Jung-Hsin Lin,et al. The relaxed complex method: Accommodating receptor flexibility for drug design with an improved scoring scheme. , 2003, Biopolymers.
[157] M. Karplus,et al. CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .
[158] J. Andrew McCammon,et al. Method for Including the Dynamic Fluctuations of a Protein in Computer-Aided Drug Design , 1999 .
[159] J. Mccammon,et al. Computational drug design accommodating receptor flexibility: the relaxed complex scheme. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[160] K. Fukasawa,et al. Structure-based generation of a new class of potent Cdk4 inhibitors: new de novo design strategy and library design. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[161] A. Caflisch,et al. Efficient electrostatic solvation model for protein‐fragment docking , 2001, Proteins.
[162] Jyh-Ping Hsu,et al. Recent developments in structural proteomics for protein structure determination , 2005, Proteomics.
[163] Dusanka Janezic,et al. Harmonic analysis of large systems. I. Methodology , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..
[164] P. Goodford. A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. , 1985, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[165] J Andrew McCammon,et al. Discovery of a novel binding trench in HIV integrase. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[166] T Lengauer,et al. Two-stage method for protein-ligand docking. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[167] W. L. Jorgensen,et al. AN EXTENDED LINEAR RESPONSE METHOD FOR DETERMINING FREE ENERGIES OF HYDRATION , 1995 .
[168] G Klebe,et al. Docking ligands onto binding site representations derived from proteins built by homology modelling. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.
[169] F. Bushman,et al. Developing a dynamic pharmacophore model for HIV-1 integrase. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[170] Johan Åqvist,et al. Ligand binding affinity prediction by linear interaction energy methods , 1998, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[171] John Moult,et al. A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.
[172] Maurizio Recanatini,et al. A computational study of the binding of propidium to the peripheral anionic site of human acetylcholinesterase. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[173] J. Åqvist,et al. The linear interaction energy method for predicting ligand binding free energies. , 2001, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.
[174] Dusanka Janezic,et al. Harmonic analysis of large systems. II. Comparison of different protein models , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..
[175] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Integrating virtual screening in lead discovery. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[176] F. Lombardo,et al. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.
[177] Thomas Lengauer,et al. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[178] Dusanka Janezic,et al. Harmonic analysis of large systems. III. Comparison with molecular dynamics , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..
[179] Hwangseo Park,et al. Homology modeling, force field design, and free energy simulation studies to optimize the activities of histone deacetylase inhibitors , 2004, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[180] W. Sippl,et al. Glucocorticoid receptor interactions with glucocorticoids: evaluation by molecular modeling and functional analysis of glucocorticoid receptor mutants , 2003, Steroids.
[181] Petra Schneider,et al. De novo design of molecular architectures by evolutionary assembly of drug-derived building blocks , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[182] M. Karplus,et al. Functionality maps of binding sites: A multiple copy simultaneous search method , 1991, Proteins.
[183] Shaomeng Wang,et al. An Extensive Test of 14 Scoring Functions Using the PDBbind Refined Set of 800 Protein-Ligand Complexes , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[184] J. Åqvist,et al. Q: a molecular dynamics program for free energy calculations and empirical valence bond simulations in biomolecular systems. , 1998, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[185] T. Blundell,et al. Structural biology and drug discovery. , 2005, Drug discovery today.
[186] Haruki Nakamura,et al. Flexible docking of a ligand peptide to a receptor protein by multicanonical molecular dynamics simulation , 1997 .
[187] Berk Hess,et al. GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis , 2001 .
[188] J Andrew McCammon,et al. Studying the roles of W86, E202, and Y337 in binding of acetylcholine to acetylcholinesterase using a combined molecular dynamics and multiple docking approach , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[189] Matthew P. Repasky,et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[190] Vladislav Vasilyev,et al. Application of semiempirical quantum chemical methods as a scoring function in docking , 2004 .
[191] P. Kollman,et al. Combined molecular mechanical and continuum solvent approach (MM-PBSA/GBSA) to predict ligand binding , 2000 .
[192] R. Clark,et al. Consensus scoring for ligand/protein interactions. , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.