The Relationship Between the Clinical and Radiological Findings and the Outcomes of Early Surgical Treatment After Tossy Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

Background Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is a common injury among young and physically active persons. Evaluating surgical outcomes clinically and radiographically is widely accepted, but it is not known which clinical tests or radiological indicators are the most important. Our hypothesis is that there is a significant correlation between clinical and radiological findings and outcomes after the early surgical treatment of Tossy type III ACJ dislocation. Materials and methods A retrospective study was conducted on 23 patients who underwent early surgical treatment after Tossy type III ACJ dislocation. We used the constant score (CS) and the simple shoulder test (SST) to measure the outcomes. For clinical evaluation, Paxinos, O’Brien’s, Bell-van Riet’s, and horizontal adduction tests were used. Standard A-P view radiographs were evaluated for redislocation, ACJ arthrosis, coracoclavicular (CC) space ossification, and for the presence of osteolysis. Results The mean time of follow-up was 16 months (range, 12-22 months). During the follow-up, all patients had one or more pathological radiological signs. All clinical tests were negative in 12 patients, seven had one positive test, three had two positive tests, and one had three positive tests. The mean CS result at the follow-up was 93.44 ± 4.90 (range, 84-100), and the mean SST result was 10.78 ± 1.51 (range, 6-12). There was no statistically significant association between the CS results and either shoulder tests or radiological findings. The SST results were statistically significantly lower for patients with positive O’Brien’s test compared to those with a negative one. In contrast, the SST results were statistically significantly higher for patients with CC space ossification, compared to those who did not have this radiological sign. Other clinical tests and radiological findings did not have any associations with the SST results. Conclusions We found that positive O’Brien’s test was associated with worse outcomes of early surgical treatment after Tossy type III ACJ dislocation. Despite the presence of pathological radiological signs, patients may have good or even perfect clinical outcomes after the early surgical treatment of a Tossy type III injury.

[1]  A. Weimann,et al.  Minimally Invasive Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction With a Flip-Button Technique (MINAR) , 2015, The American journal of sports medicine.

[2]  I. Lo,et al.  Complications following arthroscopic fixation of acromioclavicular separations: a systematic review of the literature , 2015, Open access journal of sports medicine.

[3]  S. Sastre,et al.  Acute acromioclavicular dislocation: a cheaper, easier and all-arthroscopic system. Is it effective in nowadays economical crisis? , 2015, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[4]  M. Balke,et al.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the Rockwood classification in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations , 2016, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[5]  T. Ye,et al.  Comparison of the outcome of early and delayed surgical treatment of complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation , 2016, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[6]  T. Mittlmeier,et al.  Acromioclavicular joint dislocations: radiological correlation between Rockwood classification system and injury patterns in human cadaver species , 2014, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[7]  Kai Wu,et al.  Restoration of horizontal stability in complete acromioclavicular joint separations: surgical technique and preliminary results , 2013, European Journal of Medical Research.

[8]  F. Fauci,et al.  Surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular dislocation with biologic graft vs synthetic ligament: a prospective randomized comparative study , 2013, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[9]  Olga Solovyova,et al.  Current concepts in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations. , 2013, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[10]  A. Ekelund,et al.  Acute surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation type V with a hook plate: superiority to late reconstruction. , 2013, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[11]  R. Dodenhoff,et al.  Management of Type 3 Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: Comparison of Long-Term Functional Results of Two Operative Methods , 2012, ISRN surgery.

[12]  R. Guinand,et al.  Arthroscopic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using a synthetic ligament device , 2012, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[13]  P. Motta,et al.  Acromioclavicular motion after surgical reconstruction , 2012, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[14]  M. Scheibel,et al.  Arthroscopically Assisted Stabilization of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Separations , 2011, The American journal of sports medicine.

[15]  C. Hing,et al.  Operative versus non-operative management following Rockwood grade III acromioclavicular separation: a meta-analysis of the current evidence base , 2011, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[16]  R. V. van Riet,et al.  Clinical evaluation of acromioclavicular joint pathology: sensitivity of a new test. , 2011, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[17]  T. Mittlmeier,et al.  Hook plate fixation for acromioclavicular joint separations restores coracoclavicular distance more accurately than PDS augmentation, however presents with a high rate of acromial osteolysis , 2011, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[18]  P. Bousquet,et al.  Acute grade III and IV acromioclavicular dislocations: outcomes and pitfalls of reconstruction procedures using a synthetic ligament. , 2010, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[19]  T. Lind,et al.  Surgical treatment of acute and chronic acromioclavicular dislocation Tossy type III and V using the Hook plate. , 2008, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[20]  F. Gohlke,et al.  Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood III–V: results of early versus delayed surgical treatment , 2008, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[21]  R. V. van Riet,et al.  Acromioclavicular Joint Reduction, Repair and Reconstruction Using Metallic Buttons-Early Results and Complications , 2007 .

[22]  G. Murrell,et al.  Diagnostic values of tests for acromioclavicular joint pain. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  T. G. Tienen,et al.  A Modified Technique of Reconstruction for Complete Acromioclavicular Dislocation: A Prospective Study , 2003, The American journal of sports medicine.

[24]  C. Dumontier,et al.  Acromioclavicular dislocations: treatment by coracoacromial ligamentoplasty. , 1995, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[25]  Evan L. Flatow,et al.  Surgical Treatment of Complete Acromioclavicular Dislocations , 1994, The American journal of sports medicine.

[26]  H. Tullos,et al.  Acromioclavicular joint dislocations , 1977, The American journal of sports medicine.

[27]  N. C. Mead,et al.  11 Acromioclavicular Separations: Useful and Practical Classification for Treatment , 1963, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.