The acceptable noise level: The effect of repeated measurements

Abstract Objective: This study explores if increasing number of repetitions might improve the precision of the acceptable noise level (ANL) test. Design: We measured twelve ANL repetitions, i.e. four complete ANL tests (4 × 3 repetitions), at one session using diotic presentation and a non-semantic ANL version. Study sample: Thirty-two normal-hearing adults. Results: Small order and fatigue effects were seen. We used the coefficient of repeatability (CR) to assess the repeatability; CRs ranged between 3.9 and 7.6 dB for the four ANL tests. Using the twelve ANL repetitions we removed the variability of the ANL across subjects by normalizing the data to the individual mean ANL for the twelve repetitions. The mean normalized ANL across the subjects rapidly approached the ANL normalized to the individual mean for the 12 repetitions (0 dB), and after three repetitions the SD seemed to be stable at about 3 dB. Conclusions: The findings suggest that both order and fatigue affect the ANL. The findings also suggest that it may be more accurate to speak of an acceptable noise range than ANL. These findings have large implications for how we understand acceptable noise and it would explain a large part of the variability seen among normal-hearing and perhaps hearing-impaired subjects.

[1]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Development and analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS) , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[2]  Jong S Kim,et al.  The effects of asymmetric directional microphone fittings on acceptance of background noise , 2011, International journal of audiology.

[3]  Anna K Nabelek,et al.  The influence of listener's gender on the acceptance of background noise. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[4]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[5]  A. Harkrider,et al.  Acceptable noise level, phoneme recognition in noise, and measures of auditory efferent activity. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[6]  Patrick N Plyler,et al.  The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[7]  A. Nabelek,et al.  Effect of stimulant medication on the acceptance of background noise in individuals with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[8]  J. Weir Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. , 2005, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[9]  Clifford A Franklin,et al.  The effect of speech presentation level on acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal hearing. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[10]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[11]  Tan Lee,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a computerized self-administered hearing test , 2012, International journal of audiology.

[12]  C. Hass,et al.  Effect of Moderate-Intensity Exercise Training on the Cognitive Function of Young Adults with Intellectual Disabilities , 2012, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[13]  Steen Ostergaard Acceptable noise level: Repeatability with Danish and non-semantic speech materials for adults with normal hearing , 2016 .

[14]  D. Beaton,et al.  Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research. , 2002, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[15]  I. Nabelek,et al.  Estimation of client-assessed hearing aid performance based upon unaided variables. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  H. Dillon,et al.  An international comparison of long‐term average speech spectra , 1994 .

[17]  Melinda C Freyaldenhoven,et al.  Acceptable noise level as a measure of directional hearing aid benefit. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[18]  Steen Østergaard Olsen,et al.  Acceptable noise level with Danish, Swedish, and non-semantic speech materials , 2012, International journal of audiology.

[19]  Robert E. Moore,et al.  Most comfortable listening levels, background noise levels, and acceptable noise levels for children and adults with normal hearing. , 2011, Journal of american academy of audiology.

[20]  K Jonas Brännström,et al.  Acceptance of background noise, working memory capacity, and auditory evoked potentials in subjects with normal hearing. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[21]  Junghwa Bahng,et al.  Acceptance of background noise levels in bilingual (Korean-English) listeners. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[22]  S. Arlinger,et al.  A comparison of 2-dB and 5-dB step size in pure-tone audiometry. , 1986, Scandinavian audiology.

[23]  A. Harkrider,et al.  Differences in responses from the cochleae and central nervous systems of females with low versus high acceptable noise levels. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[24]  J. Kei,et al.  High-Frequency Pure-Tone Audiometry in Children: A Test–Retest Reliability Study Relative to Ototoxic Criteria , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[25]  Robert A Muenchen,et al.  Acceptable noise level: reliability measures and comparison to preference for background sounds. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[26]  Brian Taylor The Acceptable Noise Level Test as a predictor of real-world hearing aid benefit , 2008 .

[27]  Susan Gordon-Hickey,et al.  The relationship of locus of control, self-control, and acceptable noise levels for young listeners with normal hearing , 2012, International journal of audiology.

[28]  Robert A Muenchen,et al.  Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[29]  A. Harkrider,et al.  Auditory evoked potentials in females with high and low acceptance of background noise when listening to speech. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  C Ludvigsen,et al.  DANTALE: a new Danish speech material. , 1989, Scandinavian audiology.

[31]  Benjamin W Y Hornsby,et al.  The Effects of Digital Noise Reduction on the Acceptance of Background Noise , 2006, Trends in amplification.

[32]  Anna K Nabelek,et al.  Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[33]  P. Plyler,et al.  Effects of speech signal content and speaker gender on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal hearing , 2011, International journal of audiology.

[34]  P. Bievre The 2007 International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM), JCGM 200:2008 [ISO/IEC Guide 99]: Meeting the need for intercontinentally understood concepts and their associated intercontinentally agreed terms. , 2009 .

[35]  Yu-Hsiang Wu,et al.  The equivalence of acceptable noise level (ANL) with English, Mandarin, and non-semantic speech: A study across the U.S. and Taiwan , 2013, International journal of audiology.

[36]  T R Letowski,et al.  Toleration of background noises: relationship with patterns of hearing aid use by elderly persons. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[37]  C. Kamm,et al.  Psychometric functions for loudness discomfort and most comfortable loudness levels. , 1976, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[38]  Robert Moore,et al.  Intertester reliability of the acceptable noise level. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[39]  Robert E. Moore,et al.  The impact of listening condition on background noise acceptance for young adults with normal hearing. , 2012, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[40]  Robert E. Moore,et al.  Influence of music and music preference on acceptable noise levels in listeners with normal hearing. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[41]  Steen Østergaard Olsen,et al.  Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users , 2012, International journal of audiology.