The Effect of Communication Quality and Quantity Indicators on Intimacy and Relational Satisfaction

The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the effect of communication quality and quantity indicators on relational satisfaction and intimacy. Individuals were asked to record all of their interactions with their same-sex friend or romantic partner on a daily basis for a week. A total of 79 participants took part in the study. Results indicated that communication quality indicators explained more variance in both relational satisfaction and intimacy than did communication quantity indicators; however, quantity indicators explained significant variance above and beyond quality indicators for intimacy. Regarding individual communication quality and quantity indicators, the communication quantity indicator of total time in face-to-face interaction related to experiencing intimacy in a relationship. The communication quality indicators of satisfaction with interactions, smooth, and activity related to experiencing relational satisfaction, as did the communication quantity indicator of the total number of face-to-face interactions. Conclusions are drawn regarding the impact of quality and quantity communication in close relationships.

[1]  M. Hecht.  The Conceptualization and Measurement of Interpersonal Communication Satisfaction. , 1978 .

[2]  M. Knapp,et al.  Perceptions of communication behavior associated with relationship terms , 1980 .

[3]  R. S. Miller,et al.  The assessment of social intimacy. , 1982, Journal of personality assessment.

[4]  William D. Berry,et al.  Multiple regression in practice , 1985 .

[5]  W. Schumm.  Self-Disclosure and Marital Satisfaction Revisited. , 1986 .

[6]  R. Rice,et al.  Electronic Emotion , 1987 .

[7]  S. Nock,et al.  Time Together Among Dual-Earner Couples , 1987 .

[8]  B. Montgomery.  Quality communication in personal relationships. , 1988 .

[9]  Susan S. Hendrick.  A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. , 1988 .

[10]  E. Berscheid,et al.  The Relationship Closeness Inventory : Assessing the Closeness of Interpersonal Relationships , 2004 .

[11]  P. England,et al.  A measurement model for subjective marital solidarity: Invariance across time, gender, and life cycle stage , 1990 .

[12]  Annarita Marinucci Kelly,et al.  Subordinate-manager communication in different sex dyads: consequences for job satisfaction , 1990 .

[13]  Laura Stafford,et al.  Maintenance Strategies and Romantic Relationship Type, Gender and Relational Characteristics , 1991 .

[14]  Steven W. Duck,et al.  Some Evident Truths About Conversations in Everyday Relationships All Communications Are Not Created Equal , 1991 .

[15]  S. Brooks,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1993 .

[16]  C. Swensen,et al.  Time Spent Together and Relationship Quality: Long-Distance Relationships as a Test Case , 1995 .

[17]  K. Dindia,et al.  The effect of relational stage and intimacy on touch: An extension of Guerrero and Andersen , 1995 .

[18]  M. Laplante,et al.  Need for Assistance in the Activities of Daily Living. Disability Statistics Abstract, Number 18. , 1997 .

[19]  H. Hayghe.  Developments in Women's Labor Force Participation , 1997 .

[20]  P. Rones,et al.  Trends in Hours of Work since the Mid-1970s , 1997 .

[21]  A. Winkler.  Earnings of Husbands and Wives in Dual-Earner Families , 1998 .

[22]  Kathryn Dindia,et al.  Relational Continuity Constructional Units and the Maintenance of Relationships , 1998 .

[23]  S. Duck,et al.  Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions. , 1998 .

[24]  斎藤 香,et al.  Friendship , 1998, Terror Capitalism.

[25]  Karen J. Prager.  Intimacy in personal relationships. , 2000 .

[26]  Steven W. Duck,et al.  Weaving Social Support and Relationships Together , 2000 .

[27]  Tara M. Emmers-Sommer,et al.  Perceptions of relational interdependence in online relationships: The effects of communication apprehension and introversion , 2000 .

[28]  J. Nussbaum,et al.  Aging, communication, and health : linking research and practice for successful aging , 2001 .

[29]  R. Gonzalez.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 2003 .