The Political Economy of Death in the Age of Information: A Critical Approach to the Digital Afterlife Industry

Online technologies enable vast amounts of data to outlive their producers online, thereby giving rise to a new, digital form of afterlife presence. Although researchers have begun investigating the nature of such presence, academic literature has until now failed to acknowledge the role of commercial interests in shaping it. The goal of this paper is to analyse what those interests are and what ethical consequences they may have. This goal is pursued in three steps. First, we introduce the concept of the Digital Afterlife Industry (DAI), and define it as an object of study. Second, we identify the politico-economic interests of the DAI. For this purpose, we develop an analytical approach based on an informational interpretation of Marxian economics. Third, we explain the practical manifestations of the interests using four real life cases. The findings expose the incentives of the DAI to alter what is referred to as the “informational bodies” of the dead, which in turn is to be seen as a violation of the principle of human dignity. To prevent such consequences, we argue that the ethical conventions that guide trade with remains of organic bodies may serve as a good model for future regulation of DAI.

[1]  Tony Walter,et al.  Communication media and the dead: from the Stone Age to Facebook , 2015, Mortality.

[2]  Kirsten A. Foot,et al.  Web-Based Memorializing After September 11: Toward a Conceptual Framework , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  Nicola Wright,et al.  Death and the Internet: The implications of the digital afterlife , 2014, First Monday.

[4]  Lanfranco Aceti.  Eternally present and eternally absent: the cultural politics of a thanatophobic Internet and its visual representations of artificial existences , 2015 .

[5]  John Romano,et al.  Your Digital Afterlife: When Facebook, Flickr and Twitter Are Your Estate, What's Your Legacy? , 2010 .

[6]  Friedrich Engels,et al.  Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844 . Communist manifesto , 1988 .

[7]  Liz Stillwaggon Swan,et al.  DIGITAL IMMORTALITY: SELF OR 0010110? , 2012 .

[8]  Mary Ellen Macdonald,et al.  Death and grief on-line: Virtual memorialization and changing concepts of childhood death and parental bereavement on the Internet , 2012 .

[9]  H. Chung.  The reanimation of the digital (un)dead, or how to regenerate bodies in digital cinema , 2015 .

[10]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  Distributed Morality in an Information Society , 2012, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[11]  L. Floridi.  On Human Dignity as a Foundation for the Right to Privacy , 2016 .

[12]  Abbe E. Forman,et al.  R.I.P.: Remain in perpetuity. Facebook memorial pages , 2013, Telematics Informatics.

[13]  K. Marx.  A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy , 1859 .

[14]  Eric Steinhart,et al.  Survival as a Digital Ghost , 2007, Minds and Machines.

[15]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Beyond the Grave: Facebook as a Site for the Expansion of Death and Mourning , 2013, Inf. Soc..

[16]  Mikko Tapani Karaiste.  Delete: The virtue of forgetting in the digital age , 2010 .

[17]  D. Horton,et al.  Mass communication and para-social interaction; observations on intimacy at a distance. , 1956, Psychiatry.

[18]  Damien McCallig.  Facebook after death: an evolving policy in a social network , 2014, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[19]  K. Marx.  Capital: A Critique of Political Economy , 1867 .

[20]  Alfred Montoya.  From “the People” to “the Human”: HIV/AIDS, Neoliberalism, and the Economy of Virtue in Contemporary Vietnam , 2012 .

[21]  Scott H. Church,et al.  Digital Gravescapes: Digital Memorializing on Facebook , 2013, Inf. Soc..

[22]  Luis Amaral,et al.  Plataforms for digital heritage management , 2015, 2015 10th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI).

[23]  L. Floridi.  The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era , 2014 .

[24]  M. Gibbs,et al.  Posthumous personhood and the affordances of digital media , 2015 .

[25]  P. Boylan.  International Council of Museums (ICOM) , 2010 .

[26]  Alice E. Marwick.  Status Update , 2017 .

[27]  E. Steinhart,et al.  Your Digital Afterlives: Computational Theories of Life after Death , 2014 .

[28]  L. Floridi,et al.  The Ethics of Information , 2013, Dialogue.

[29]  Martin R. Gibbs,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on the Death, Afterlife, and Immortality of Bodies and Data , 2013, Inf. Soc..

[30]  Patrick Stokes,et al.  Ghosts in the Machine: Do the Dead Live on in Facebook? , 2011, Philosophy & Technology.

[31]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  The Fourth Revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality , 2014 .

[32]  Tero Karppi,et al.  Death Proof: On the Biopolitics and Noopolitics of Memorializing Dead Facebook Users , 2013 .

[33]  Mike Parker Pearson,et al.  The Archaeology of Death and Burial , 1999 .

[34]  C. Fuchs,et al.  What Is Digital Labour? What Is Digital Work? What’s their Difference? And Why Do These Questions Matter for Understanding Social Media? , 2013 .

[35]  Alexandra Sherlock,et al.  Larger Than Life: Digital Resurrection and the Re-Enchantment of Society , 2013, Inf. Soc..

[36]  Patrick Stokes,et al.  Deletion as second death: the moral status of digital remains , 2015, Ethics and Information Technology.

[37]  Jessica Lingel,et al.  The Digital Remains: Social Media and Practices of Online Grief , 2013, Inf. Soc..

[38]  Sonia Chiasson,et al.  Survey on the Fate of Digital Footprints after Death , 2014 .

[39]  Lisa Portmess,et al.  Data barns, ambient intelligence and cloud computing: the tacit epistemology and linguistic representation of Big Data , 2014, Ethics and Information Technology.