Holistic Processing of Words Modulated by Reading Experience

Perceptual expertise has been studied intensively with faces and object categories involving detailed individuation. A common finding is that experience in fulfilling the task demand of fine, subordinate-level discrimination between highly similar instances is associated with the development of holistic processing. This study examines whether holistic processing is also engaged by expert word recognition, which is thought to involve coarser, basic-level processing that is more part-based. We adopted a paradigm widely used for faces – the composite task, and found clear evidence of holistic processing for English words. A second experiment further showed that holistic processing for words was sensitive to the amount of experience with the language concerned (native vs. second-language readers) and with the specific stimuli (words vs. pseudowords). The adoption of a paradigm from the face perception literature to the study of expert word perception is important for further comparison between perceptual expertise with words and face-like expertise.

[1]  Alison Harris,et al.  The Representation of Parts and Wholes in Face-selective Cortex , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  J. Grainger,et al.  Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Revisiting the role of spatial frequencies in the holistic processing of faces. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[5]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Cognitive Neuropsychology: Patterns of Co-occurrence Among the Associative Agnosias: Implications for Visual Object Representation , 1991 .

[6]  Jennifer J. Richler,et al.  Context influences holistic processing of nonface objects in the composite task , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[7]  anonymous,et al.  Visual agnosia , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  D. Pelli,et al.  Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[9]  Cindy M. Bukach,et al.  Limits of generalization between categories and implications for theories of category specificity , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Should we reject the expertise hypothesis? , 2007, Cognition.

[11]  G. Rhodes,et al.  An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition , 2008, Cognition.

[12]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Holistic Processing Predicts Face Recognition , 2011, Psychological science.

[13]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[14]  Last, but not least , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[15]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Words Are More Than The Sum Of Their Parts: Evidence For Detrimental Effects Of Word-Level Information in Alexia , 2002, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[16]  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia,et al.  R34D1NG W0RD5 W1TH NUMB3R5. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[18]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[19]  D. Pelli,et al.  Parts, Wholes, and Context in Reading: A Triple Dissociation , 2007, PloS one.

[20]  Sharon M. Thomas,et al.  The Illusory-Letters Phenomenon: An Illustration of Graphemic Restoration in Visual Word Recognition , 1999, Perception.

[21]  T. Sanocki Time course of object identification: evidence for a global-to-local contingency. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  G. Hole Configurational Factors in the Perception of Unfamiliar Faces , 1994, Perception.

[23]  M. Tarr,et al.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  G. Cottrell,et al.  Seeing Blobs as Faces or Letters: Modeling Effects on Discrimination , 2004 .

[25]  Zhe Wang,et al.  Activation of Face Expertise and the Inversion Effect , 2006, Psychological science.

[26]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Ventral and dorsal contributions to word reading. , 2009 .

[27]  W. Keller,et al.  Last but Not Least Regulated Poly(A) Tail Formation , 1999, Cell.

[28]  Stuart Anstis,et al.  Holistic Word Processing , 2005 .

[29]  Michael L. Mack,et al.  Holistic processing of faces happens at a glance , 2009, Vision Research.

[30]  Valérie Goffaux,et al.  Spatial interactions in upright and inverted faces: Re-exploration of spatial scale influence , 2009, Vision Research.

[31]  H. Ellis,et al.  Identification of Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces from Internal and External Features: Some Implications for Theories of Face Recognition , 1979, Perception.

[32]  I. Gauthier,et al.  An analysis of letter expertise in a levels-of-categorization framework , 2007 .

[33]  A. Young,et al.  Matching Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces on Internal and External Features , 1985, Perception.

[34]  Michael J Wenger,et al.  A decisional component of holistic encoding. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[36]  G. M. Reicher Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition , 2003, Nature.

[38]  D. D. Wheeler Processes in word recognition , 1970 .

[39]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Conditions for Facelike Expertise with Objects Becoming a Ziggerin Expert—but Which Type? , 2022 .

[41]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks , 2007, Cognition.

[42]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Why does selective attention to parts fail in face processing? , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  T. Busey,et al.  Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for configural processing in fingerprint experts , 2005, Vision Research.

[46]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Expertise with characters in alphabetic and nonalphabetic writing systems engage overlapping occipito-temporal areas , 2009, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[47]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[48]  Cindy M. Bukach,et al.  Beyond faces and modularity: the power of an expertise framework , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Bayesian learning of visual chunks by human observers , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  M. Tarr,et al.  Training ‘greeble’ experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes , 1998, Vision Research.

[51]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.

[52]  M. Tarr,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area is Part of a Network that Processes Faces at the Individual Level , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Reading normal and degraded words: Contribution of the dorsal and ventral visual pathways , 2008, NeuroImage.

[54]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Center–periphery organization of human object areas , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  Garrison W Cottrell,et al.  Not All Visual Expertise Is Holistic, but It May Be Leftist , 2009, Psychological science.

[56]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Holistic processing of musical notation: Dissociating failures of selective attention in experts and novices , 2010, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[57]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[58]  D. Maurer,et al.  The Effect of Categorisation on Sensitivity to Second-Order Relations in Novel Objects , 2008, Perception.

[59]  H Stanislaw,et al.  Calculation of signal detection theory measures , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.