Swarming Unmanned Air and Ground Systems for Surveillance and Base Protection

The emergence of various risks to global security and stability is a motivation to develop remote sensing and monitoring systems that can be deployed on Unmanned Vehicles (UxVs). This requires the development of robust autonomous control technologies that can reliably coordinate large numbers of networked heterogeneous systems cooperating on a common mission objective. This paper describes a promising approach to addressing this challenge by using swarm intelligence to coordinate multiple heterogeneous vehicles and remote sensors in realistic applications. We describe a class of stigmergic algorithms based on digital pheromones to control and coordinate the actions of heterogeneous unmanned air and ground systems in two applications: broad area surveillance and base protection. An Operator System Interface was developed to evaluate techniques for enabling a single operator to monitor and manage multiple unmanned vehicles and unattended sensors of different types. The results from recent demonstrations of the technology using air and ground platforms are reported.

[1]  A. Richards,et al.  A decentralized algorithm for robust constrained model predictive control , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[2]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Exact robot navigation using artificial potential functions , 1992, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[3]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  Swarm Intelligence: A New C2 Paradigm with an Application to Control Swarms of UAVs , 2003 .

[4]  J. Stipes,et al.  Cooperating unmanned vehicles , 2004, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE Networking, Sensing and Control, 2005..

[5]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[6]  David W. Payton,et al.  Pheromone Robotics , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[7]  G. Matthews Human Performance: Cognition, Stress and Individual Differences , 2000 .

[8]  H. Van Dyke Parunak,et al.  "Go to the ant": Engineering principles from natural multi-agent systems , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[9]  Vera Zaychik,et al.  Inverting the Operator / Vehicle Ratio : Approaches to Next Generation UAV Command and Control , 2005 .

[10]  H. Van Dyke Parunak,et al.  Stigmergic learning for self-organizing mobile ad-hoc networks (MANET's) , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[11]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1998 .

[12]  Ahmad A. Masoud,et al.  Constrained motion control using vector potential fields , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[13]  H. Van Dyke Parunak,et al.  Performance of digital pheromones for swarming vehicle control , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[14]  Hyochoong Bang,et al.  Cooperative Control of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using the Potential Field Theory , 2006 .

[15]  Sean Luke,et al.  A pheromone-based utility model for collaborative foraging , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[16]  H. Van Dyke Parunak,et al.  Evolving adaptive pheromone path planning mechanisms , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[17]  H. Van Dyke Parunak,et al.  Effectiveness of Digital Pheromones Controlling Swarming Vehicles in Military Scenarios , 2007, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun..

[18]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.