Role of hippocampal NMDA receptors in trace eyeblink conditioning
暂无分享,去创建一个
Yutaka Kirino | Shigenori Kawahara | Toshiro Sakamoto | H. Niki | S. Kawahara | Y. Kirino | M. Mishina | Masayoshi Mishina | Kanako Takatsuki | Hiroaki Niki | K. Takatsuki | T. Sakamoto
[1] M. Wilson,et al. Formation of Temporal Memory Requires NMDA Receptors within CA1 Pyramidal Neurons , 2000, Neuron.
[2] Richard E Thompson,et al. Cerebellar circuits and synaptic mechanisms involved in classical eyeblink conditioning , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.
[3] M. Mishina. Timing determines the neural substrates for eyeblink conditioning , 2003 .
[4] R. F. Thompson,et al. Hippocampus and trace conditioning of the rabbit's classically conditioned nictitating membrane response. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.
[5] Yutaka Kirino,et al. Time-Dependent Reorganization of the Brain Components Underlying Memory Retention in Trace Eyeblink Conditioning , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[6] Richard F. Thompson,et al. Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: acquisition and retention. , 2003, Learning & memory.
[7] J. Steinmetz,et al. Intra-cerebellar infusion of NMDA receptor antagonist AP5 disrupts classical eyeblink conditioning in rabbits , 2000, Brain Research.
[8] R. Morris,et al. The NMDA receptor antagonist D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate (D-AP5) impairs spatial learning and LTP in vivo at intracerebral concentrations comparable to those that block LTP in vitro , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[9] S. Kotani,et al. The Hippocampus Plays an Important Role in Eyeblink Conditioning with a Short Trace Interval in Glutamate Receptor Subunit δ2 Mutant Mice , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[10] David G. Lavond,et al. Trace conditioning: Abolished by cerebellar nuclear lesions but not lateral cerebellar cortex aspirations , 1985, Brain Research.
[11] S Kawahara,et al. Classical eyeblink conditioning in glutamate receptor subunit δ2 mutant mice is impaired in the delay paradigm but not in the trace paradigm , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.
[12] T. Manabe,et al. Increased Thresholds for Long-Term Potentiation and Contextual Learning in Mice Lacking the NMDA-type Glutamate Receptor ε1 Subunit , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[13] S. Kawahara,et al. Long‐trace interval eyeblink conditioning is impaired in mutant mice lacking the NMDA receptor subunit ε1 , 2001 .
[14] S. Wang,et al. Coincidence detection in single dendritic spines mediated by calcium release , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.
[15] George Paxinos,et al. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 2001 .
[16] T. Shors,et al. Early acquisition, but not retention, of the classically conditioned eyeblink response is N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor dependent. , 1996, Behavioral neuroscience.
[17] I. Daum,et al. The NMDA antagonist memantine impairs classical eyeblink conditioning in humans , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.
[18] O. Stiedl,et al. Impairment of conditioned contextual fear of C57BL/6J mice by intracerebral injections of the NMDA receptor antagonist APV , 2000, Behavioural Brain Research.
[19] S. Kawahara,et al. Effects of the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 on classical eyeblink conditioning in mice , 2001, Neuropharmacology.
[20] J. Disterhoft,et al. Cortical involvement in acquisition and extinction of trace eyeblink conditioning. , 2000, Behavioral neuroscience.
[21] John F. Disterhoft,et al. Lesions of the Caudal Area of Rabbit Medial Prefrontal Cortex Impair Trace Eyeblink Conditioning , 1998, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.
[22] G. B. Robinson. MK801 retards acquisition of a classically conditioned response without affecting conditioning-related alterations in perforant path-granule cell synaptic transmission , 1993, Psychobiology.
[23] M. Fanselow,et al. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist APV blocks acquisition but not expression of fear conditioning. , 1991, Behavioral neuroscience.
[24] Joseph E LeDoux,et al. Parallels between cerebellum- and amygdala-dependent conditioning , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[25] J. Green,et al. Eyeblink classical conditioning: hippocampal formation is for neutral stimulus associations as cerebellum is for association-response. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.
[26] Tracey J. Shors,et al. Associative Memory Formation Increases the Observation of Dendritic Spines in the Hippocampus , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[27] S. Kawahara,et al. Impairment of eyeblink conditioning in GluRδ2‐mutant mice depends on the temporal overlap between conditioned and unconditioned stimuli , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.
[28] J. Disterhoft,et al. Trace eyeblink conditioning is hippocampally dependent in mice , 2004, Hippocampus.
[29] Lucien T. Thompson,et al. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in associative eyeblink conditioning: both MK-801 and phencyclidine produce task- and dose-dependent impairments. , 1997, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.