An extended Huff-model for robustly benchmarking and predicting retail network performance

AbstractThis study proposes a modi ed Hu model that takes directly into accountspatial competition between stores of the same brand, brand attraction basedon actual brand performance and spatially variable substitution. The modeluses only publicly available or easily acquirable data as input, whereas modeloutput is extensively validated on various levels. These levels include com-parison of modeled and real market shares on block, store and brand levelfor the Belgian food market. Results show that multi-objective optimizationof model parameters yields comparable results on block level to other modelsin the literature but improved results on store and brand levels, thereby en-suring model robustness. This robustness also enables the application of themodel for various business purposes as store location determination, leaetdistribution optimization, store and store concept benchmarking, withoutloss of spatial generality.Keywords:Hu model, retail management, spatial competition, multi-objectiveoptimization, store benchmarking, turnover prediction1. IntroductionTo monitor operational performance, retailers rely more and more onobjective store benchmarks. Benchmarks are objective in a way that theyquantify internal and external inuences on store performance (store size,brand, competition, geodemographic characteristics of consumers, etc.) toobtain a measure indicating the performance of the management. The more ne-grained such store benchmark is, based on for instance loyalty card in-formation, the more targeted improvement actions can be de ned. A storebenchmark on a ne-grained block level is therefore more valuable than abenchmark on an aggregate store level for de ning and monitoring the im-

[1]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[2]  Dinesh K. Gauri,et al.  Assessing store performance models , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Giuseppe Bruno,et al.  Using gravity models for the evaluation of new university site locations: A case study , 2008, Comput. Oper. Res..

[4]  P. Davis Spatial competition in retail markets: movie theaters , 2006 .

[5]  B. Suman,et al.  A survey of simulated annealing as a tool for single and multiobjective optimization , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[6]  Dinesh K. Gauri,et al.  Benchmarking Performance in Retail Chains: An Integrated Approach , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[7]  M. Kwan Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework , 2010 .

[8]  Alain Bultez,et al.  A Model of a Distribution Network Aggregate Performance , 1975 .

[9]  Avijit Ghosh,et al.  Parameter nonstationarity in retail choice models , 1984 .

[10]  Gérard Cliquet Implementing a subjective MCI model: An application to the furniture market , 1995 .

[11]  scar Gonzlez-Benito,et al.  The Role of Geodemographic Segmentation in Retail Location Strategy , 2005 .

[12]  Neng Wan,et al.  A relative spatial access assessment approach for analyzing potential spatial access to colorectal cancer services in Texas , 2012 .

[13]  Thomas J. Stanley,et al.  Image Inputs to a Probabilistic Model: Predicting Retail Potential , 1976 .

[14]  W. G. Hansen,et al.  A RETAIL MARKET POTENTIAL MODEL , 1965 .

[15]  Bin Zou,et al.  A three-step floating catchment area method for analyzing spatial access to health services , 2012, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Yingru Li,et al.  Assessing the impact of retail location on store performance: A comparison of Wal-Mart and Kmart stores in Cincinnati , 2012 .

[17]  Özden Gür Ali,et al.  A NEW GRAVITY MODEL WITH VARIABLE DISTANCE DECAY , 2008 .

[18]  Steve Wood,et al.  The importance of context in store forecasting: The site visit in retail location decision-making , 2008 .

[19]  C. Clarke‐Hill,et al.  UK supermarket location assessment , 1996 .

[20]  Jouko Lampinen,et al.  Building Spatial Choice Models from Aggregate Data , 2003 .

[21]  Lee G. Cooper,et al.  Parameter Estimation for a Multiplicative Competitive Interaction Model—Least Squares Approach , 1974 .