Graphical Models for Causation, and the Identification Problem

This article (which is mainly expository) sets up graphical models for causation, having a bit less than the usual complement of hypothetical counterfactuals. Assuming the invariance of error distributions may be essential for causal inference, but the errors themselves need not be invariant. Graphs can be interpreted using conditional distributions, so thatwe can better address connections between the mathematical framework and causality in the world. The identification problem is posed in terms of conditionals. As will be seen, causal relationships cannot be inferred from a data set by running regressions unless there is substantial prior knowledge about the mechanisms that generated the data. There are fewsuccessful applications of graphicalmodels, mainly because few causal pathways can be excluded on a priori grounds. The invariance conditions themselves remain to be assessed.

[1]  Philip G. Wright,et al.  The tariff on animal and vegetable oils , 1928 .

[2]  J. Keynes,et al.  The League of Nations Professor Tinbergen’s Method , 1939 .

[3]  J. Keynes Relative Movements of Real Wages and Output , 1939 .

[4]  John Maynard Keynes,et al.  On a Method of Statistical Business-Cycle Research. A Comment , 1940 .

[5]  Jan Tinbergen,et al.  On a Method of Statistical Business-Cycle Research; a reply (to Keynes) , 1940 .

[6]  E. L. Kelly Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and review of the evidence. , 1955 .

[7]  W. G. Cochran Analysis of covariance: Its nature and uses. , 1957 .

[8]  T. Liu,et al.  Underidentification, Structural Estimation, and Forecasting , 1960 .

[9]  Sir Ronald A. Fisher Smoking: The Cancer Controversy , 1960 .

[10]  J. M. Hammersley,et al.  Basic Concepts of Probability and Statistics , 1964 .

[11]  H. Bartsch,et al.  International Agency for Research on Cancer. , 1969, WHO chronicle.

[12]  D. Rubin Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. , 1974 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[14]  David V. Pritchett Econometric policy evaluation: A critique , 1976 .

[15]  P. Meehl Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. , 1978 .

[16]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[17]  David F. Hendry,et al.  Econometrics-Alchemy or Science? , 1980 .

[18]  C. Sims MACROECONOMICS AND REALITY , 1977 .

[19]  John W. Pratt,et al.  On the nature and discovery of structure , 1981 .

[20]  Thomas J. Rothenberg,et al.  On Energy Policy Models , 1983 .

[21]  Ronald G. Stansfield,et al.  Sociological Methodology 1982 , 1983 .

[22]  L. Cohen,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, Amos Tversky (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England (1982), xiv , 1984 .

[23]  David A. Freedman,et al.  Statistics and the Scientific Method , 1985 .

[24]  J. Robins A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect , 1986 .

[25]  P. Holland Statistics and Causal Inference , 1985 .

[26]  J. Robins A graphical approach to the identification and estimation of causal parameters in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[27]  D. Freedman As Others See Us: A Case Study in Path Analysis , 1987 .

[28]  P. Holland CAUSAL INFERENCE, PATH ANALYSIS AND RECURSIVE STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELS , 1988 .

[29]  Robert Schlaifer,et al.  On the interpretation and observation of laws , 1988 .

[30]  Howard Wainer,et al.  Eelworms, Bullet Holes, and Geraldine Ferraro: Some Problems With Statistical Adjustment and Some Solutions , 1989 .

[31]  J. Kaprio,et al.  Twins, smoking and mortality: a 12-year prospective study of smoking-discordant twin pairs. , 1989, Social science & medicine.

[32]  D. Freedman Statistical models and shoe leather , 1989 .

[33]  T. Speed,et al.  On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9 , 1990 .

[34]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  Introductory Remarks on Neyman (1923) , 1990 .

[35]  D. Rubin [On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9.] Comment: Neyman (1923) and Causal Inference in Experiments and Observational Studies , 1990 .

[36]  D. Braddon-Mitchell NATURE'S CAPACITIES AND THEIR MEASUREMENT , 1991 .

[37]  D. Freedman Statistical models and shoe leather , 1989 .

[38]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables , 1993 .

[39]  R. A. Stone The Assumptions on Which Causal Inferences Rest , 1993 .

[40]  R. Hoover,et al.  Lung cancer, race, and a CYP1A1 genetic polymorphism. , 1993, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[41]  K. Nakachi,et al.  Polymorphisms of the CYP1A1 and glutathione S-transferase genes associated with susceptibility to lung cancer in relation to cigarette dose in a Japanese population. , 1993, Cancer research.

[42]  James M. Robins,et al.  Discussion of Causal Diagrams for Empirical Research by J. Pearl , 1995 .

[43]  David A. Freedman SOME ISSUES IN THE FOUNDATION OF STATISTICS , 1995 .

[44]  J. Pearl Causal diagrams for empirical research , 1995 .

[45]  M. Sobel,et al.  Identification Problems in the Social Sciences. , 1996 .

[46]  G. Gigerenzer On Narrow Norms and Vague Heuristics: A Reply to Kahneman and Tversky (1996) , 1996 .

[47]  D Kahneman,et al.  On the reality of cognitive illusions. , 1996, Psychological review.

[48]  D. Carmelli,et al.  Twenty-four year mortality in World War II US male veteran twins discordant for cigarette smoking. , 1996, International journal of epidemiology.

[49]  A. Abbott Of Time and Space: The Contemporary Relevance of the Chicago School , 1997 .

[50]  D. Freedman From Association to Causation via Regression , 1997 .

[51]  J. Goldthorpe Causation, statistics, and sociology , 1998 .

[52]  Andrew Abbott,et al.  The Causal Devolution , 1998 .

[53]  Michael I. Jordan Graphical Models , 2003 .

[54]  J. Angrist,et al.  Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with Funding from Estimation of Limited-dependent Variable Models with Dummy Endogenous Regressors: Simple Strategies for Empirical Practice , 2011 .

[55]  Philip B. Stark,et al.  The Swine Flu Vaccine and Guillain-BarrÉ Syndrome , 1999, Evaluation review.

[56]  G. Shaw,et al.  Maternal pesticide exposure from multiple sources and selected congenital anomalies. , 1999 .

[57]  P. Hedström,et al.  Social mechanisms : an analytical approach to social theory , 1999 .

[58]  D. Freedman From association to causation: some remarks on the history of statistics , 1999 .

[59]  James M. Robins,et al.  Causal inference for complex longitudinal data: the continuous case , 2001 .

[60]  J. Pearl,et al.  Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[61]  J. Robins,et al.  Adjusting for Nonignorable Drop-Out Using Semiparametric Nonresponse Models , 1999 .

[62]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[63]  Michael E. Sobel,et al.  Causal Inference in the Social Sciences , 2000 .

[64]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[65]  A. Dawid Causal Inference without Counterfactuals , 2000 .

[66]  Steffen L. Lauritzen,et al.  Complex Stochastic Systems , 2001 .

[67]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[68]  Steffen L. Lauritzen,et al.  Causal Inference from Graphical Models , 2001 .

[69]  J. Angrist,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 15, Number 4—Fall 2001—Pages 69–85 Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments , 2022 .

[70]  J. Heckman Micro Data, Heterogeneity, and the Evaluation of Public Policy: Nobel Lecture , 2001, Journal of Political Economy.

[71]  M. N. Bhrolcháin ‘Divorce Effects’ and Causality in the Social Sciences , 2001 .

[72]  James H. Steiger,et al.  Driving Fast in Reverse , 2001 .

[73]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Econometrics and empirical economics , 2001 .

[74]  D. Freedman,et al.  The Swine Flu Vaccine and Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Case Study in Relative Risk and Specific Causation , 2001 .

[75]  Niels G Waller,et al.  The path analysis controversy: a new statistical approach to strong appraisal of verisimilitude. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[76]  A. Sen,et al.  Rationality and Freedom , 2002 .

[77]  Stanley Lieberson,et al.  B ARKING U P THE W RONG B RANCH : Scientific Alternatives to the Current Model of Sociological Science , 2002 .

[78]  Tom Burr,et al.  Causation, Prediction, and Search , 2003, Technometrics.

[79]  D. Neuberg,et al.  Smoking and the Risk of Lung Cancer: Susceptibility with GSTP1 Polymorphisms , 2003, Epidemiology.

[80]  R. Berk Regression Analysis: A Constructive Critique , 2003 .

[81]  David A. Freedman,et al.  SOME ISSUES IN THE FOUNDATION OF STATISTICS , 1995 .

[82]  Paul Humphreys,et al.  Are There Algorithms That Discover Causal Structure? , 1999, Synthese.

[83]  David Collier,et al.  Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards , 2004 .

[84]  Jim Woodward,et al.  Causal Interpretation in Systems of Equations , 1999, Synthese.

[85]  James M. Robins,et al.  Association, Causation, And Marginal Structural Models , 1999, Synthese.

[86]  Leonard A. Steverson Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards , 2005 .