Comprehending Complex Concepts

Abstract Recent theories of concepts have raised the issue of how people combine simple concepts (like engine and repair ) to form complex concepts (like engine repair ). This article approaches this issue by asking how people comprehend modified noun phrases of this sort. One explanation of how complex concepts are understood (the feature weighting model) provides a simple mechanism in which the primary feature of the modifying concept is made more salient in the modified concept. nother explanation focuses on how world knowledge directs the combination process. The two explanations are compared in their ability to account for the interpretation of various kinds of noun phrases. Two experiments are reported which evaluate the feature weighting model's predictions for adjective-noun phrases. These contrasts suggest that the combination process does require reference to world knowledge. The consequences of accepting such an account are discussed.

[1]  D. L. Hintzman,et al.  Differential forgetting of prototypes and old instances: Simulation by an exemplar-based classification model , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[2]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[3]  Frederick J. Newmeyer,et al.  Grammatical Theory: Its Limits and Its Possibilities , 1983 .

[4]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  Process and products of lexical access , 1986 .

[5]  Nicholas V. Findler,et al.  Associative Networks- Representation and Use of Knowledge by Computers , 1980, CL.

[6]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[7]  G. Collins,et al.  Transcending inductive category formation in learning , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  B. Webber,et al.  Elements of Discourse Understanding , 1983 .

[9]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  On putting apples into bottles — A problem of polysemy , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  How big is big? Relative and absolute properties in memory , 1980, Cognition.

[12]  G. Murphy,et al.  Establishing and accessing referents in discourse , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  The instability of graded structure: implications for the nature of concepts , 1987 .

[14]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Combining prototypes: A selective modification model. , 1988 .

[15]  D. E. Breedlove,et al.  General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology , 1973 .

[16]  Guy Carden,et al.  Syntactic and semantic data: replication results , 1976, Language in Society.

[17]  Timothy W. Finin.  The Semantic Interpretation of Nominal Compounds , 1980, AAAI.

[18]  Katherine Nelson,et al.  Some attributes of adjectives used by young children , 1976, Cognition.

[19]  Pamela A. Downing.  On the Creation and Use of English Compound Nouns. , 1977 .

[20]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[21]  L. Huling-Austin,et al.  Acquiring expertise. , 1985, The Diabetes educator.

[22]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  When Nouns Surface as Verbs , 1979 .

[24]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[25]  B. Rundle.  Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science , 1984 .

[26]  Lila R. Gleitman,et al.  Phrase and Paraphrase: Some Innovative Uses of Language , 1970 .

[27]  Dwight L. Bolinger,et al.  Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication , 1967 .

[28]  Benjamin Cohen,et al.  Models of Concepts , 1984, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  L. Rips.  Similarity, typicality, and categorization , 1989 .

[30]  R. Lees.  The grammar of English nominalizations , 1960 .

[31]  J. Hampton.  Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[32]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Semantic Memory and Psychological Semantics , 1974, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[33]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Tutorials in learning and memory : essays in honor of Gordon Bower , 1984 .

[34]  G. Murphy,et al.  Changes in conceptual structure with expertise: Differences between real-world experts and novices. , 1984 .

[35]  J. Hampton.  Overextension of Conjunctive Concepts: Evidence for a Unitary Model of Concept Typicality and Class Inclusion , 1988 .

[36]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts , 1981, Cognition.

[37]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  Compound Nouns and Category Structure in Young Children. , 1985 .

[38]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  A context-sensitive representation of word meanings , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. , 1987 .

[40]  B. Tversky,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : General VOL . 113 , No . 2 JUNE 1984 Objects , Parts , and Categories , 2005 .

[41]  Judith N. Levi,et al.  The syntax and semantics of complex nominals , 1978 .

[42]  Daniel N. Osherson,et al.  Conceptual Combination with Prototype Concepts , 1984, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  Ronald J. Brachman,et al.  ON THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL STATUS OF SEMANTIC NETWORKS , 1979 .

[44]  D. Medin,et al.  Context and structure in conceptual combination , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.