Application of CFD on the sensitivity analyses of some parameters of the modified Hartmann tube

The aim of this work is to determine the influence of operating parameters such as the dispersion pressure, the ignition delay and height on the dust flammability. A Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation, based on an Euler-Lagrange approach, was developed with Ansys Fluent (TM) and validated experimentally. Such analysis will facilitate the choice of the most conservative conditions for a flammability test. This paper is focused on a case study performed on wheat starch with the modified Hartmann tube. The dispersion process of the powder was studied with granulometric analyses performed in situ and high speed videos. Tests were performed with injections at gas pressure ranging from 3 to 6 bars and the evolution of the particle size distribution (PSD) was recorded at different ignition heights (5, 10 and 15 cm over the dispersion nozzle). The observations highlighted the presence of agglomeration/deagglomeration processes and dust segregation. Besides, a CFD simulation analysis was aimed at evaluating the impact of a set of parameters on the PSD and the local turbulence, which are closely linked to some flammability parameters. For this computational analysis, the CFD simulation was coupled with a collision treatment based on a Discrete Element Method (DEM) in order to consider the cohesive behavior of the combustible dust. Thus the results suggest performing the injection of the gases at approximately 5 bars for the flammability tests of wheat starch in order to obtain the finest PSD at a given ignition height. It is also shown that the finest PSD are obtained at 5 cm over the dispersion nozzle. However, the local instabilities and turbulence levels are so high during the first stages of the dispersion that the flame growth can be disturbed for short ignition delays. Moreover, the stabilization of the bulk of the dust cloud requires longer periods of time when the ignition sources are located at 15 cm. As a result, the recommended height to perform a flammability test is 10 cm in this case. Finally, this study proposes some tools that might improve the procedure of dust flammability testing.

[1]  O. López,et al.  Dust explosions: CFD modeling as a tool to characterize the relevant parameters of the dust dispersion , 2013 .

[2]  Y. S. Cheong,et al.  The coefficient of restitution of different representative types of granules , 2007 .

[3]  Xiaoping Chen,et al.  Development and test of CFD-DEM model for complex geometry: A coupling algorithm for Fluent and DEM , 2013, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[4]  R. Podgornik Turbulence in Fluids , 2012 .

[5]  Weeratunge Malalasekera,et al.  An introduction to computational fluid dynamics - the finite volume method , 2007 .

[6]  Wen-Ching Yang,et al.  Modification and re-interpretation of Geldart's classification of powders , 2007 .

[7]  Jin Y. Ooi,et al.  Micromechanical analysis of cohesive granular materials using the discrete element method with an adhesive elasto-plastic contact model , 2014, Granular Matter.

[8]  Filippo Maria Denaro,et al.  What does Finite Volume-based implicit filtering really resolve in Large-Eddy Simulations? , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[9]  Jidong Zhao,et al.  Coupled CFD–DEM simulation of fluid–particle interaction in geomechanics , 2013 .

[10]  Stéphane Clain,et al.  Monoslope and multislope MUSCL methods for unstructured meshes , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[11]  Paola Russo,et al.  CFD simulations of dust dispersion in the 20 L vessel: Effect of nominal dust concentration , 2014 .

[12]  Kenneth L. Cashdollar,et al.  Effectiveness Of Dust Dispersion In The 20-L Siwek Chamber , 2010 .

[13]  Ng Niels Deen,et al.  Review of discrete particle modeling of fluidized beds , 2007 .

[14]  Rolf K. Eckhoff,et al.  Dust Explosions in the Process Industries , 1991 .

[15]  Francesco Tamanini,et al.  The role of turbulence in dust explosions , 1998 .

[16]  Kenneth L. Cashdollar,et al.  Overview of dust explosibility characteristics , 2000 .

[17]  W. Bartknecht,et al.  Dust Explosions: Course, Prevention, Protection , 1989 .

[18]  Frank P. Lees,et al.  Loss Prevention In The Process Industries , 1980 .

[19]  Laurent Dupont,et al.  Measuring the violence of dust explosions with the “20 l sphere” and with the standard “ISO 1 m3 vessel”: Systematic comparison and analysis of the discrepancies , 2007 .

[20]  Rolf K. Eckhoff,et al.  Dust explosion causation, prevention and mitigation: An overview , 2010 .

[21]  Tasneem Abbasi,et al.  Dust explosions-cases, causes, consequences, and control. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[22]  Hsiaotao Bi,et al.  Flow regime diagrams for gas-solid fluidization and upward transport , 1995 .

[23]  Michael Trunk,et al.  New model describing the total dispersion of dry powder agglomerates , 2010 .

[24]  M. Kontominas,et al.  Effect of heat treatment on moisture sorption behavior of wheat flours using a hygrometric technique , 1995 .

[25]  Kun Luo,et al.  LES-DEM investigation of gas–solid flow dynamics in an internally circulating fluidized bed , 2013 .