Efficient Reduction in Shape Parameter Space Dimension for Ship Propeller Blade Design

In this work, we present the results of a ship propeller design optimization campaign carried out in the framework of the research project PRELICA, funded by the Friuli Venezia Giulia regional government. The main idea of this work is to operate on a multidisciplinary level to identify propeller shapes that lead to reduced tip vortex-induced pressure and increased efficiency without altering the thrust. First, a specific tool for the bottom-up construction of parameterized propeller blade geometries has been developed. The algorithm proposed operates with a user defined number of arbitrary shaped or NACA airfoil sections, and employs arbitrary degree NURBS to represent the chord, pitch, skew and rake distribution as a function of the blade radial coordinate. The control points of such curves have been modified to generate, in a fully automated way, a family of blade geometries depending on as many as 20 shape parameters. Such geometries have then been used to carry out potential flow simulations with the Boundary Element Method based software PROCAL. Given the high number of parameters considered, such a preliminary stage allowed for a fast evaluation of the performance of several hundreds of shapes. In addition, the data obtained from the potential flow simulation allowed for the application of a parameter space reduction methodology based on active subspaces (AS) property, which suggested that the main propeller performance indices are, at a first but rather accurate approximation, only depending on a single parameter which is a linear combination of all the original geometric ones. AS analysis has also been used to carry out a constrained optimization exploiting response surface method in the reduced parameter space, and a sensitivity analysis based on such surrogate model. The few selected shapes were finally used to set up high fidelity RANS simulations and select an optimal shape.

[1]  Zhuyin Ren,et al.  Shared low-dimensional subspaces for propagating kinetic uncertainty to multiple outputs , 2018 .

[2]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Reducing the Dimensionality of Data with Neural Networks , 2006, Science.

[3]  G. Rozza,et al.  An integrated data-driven computational pipeline with model order reduction for industrial and applied mathematics , 2018, 1810.12364.

[4]  商船學校 Marine propellers and propulsion , 1913 .

[5]  Andrea Serani,et al.  Nonlinear Methods for Design-Space Dimensionality Reduction in Shape Optimization , 2017, MOD.

[6]  Andrea Serani,et al.  Deep Autoencoder for Off-Line Design-Space Dimensionality Reduction in Shape Optimization , 2018 .

[7]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Free Form Deformation Techniques Applied to 3D Shape Optimization Problems , 2013 .

[8]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Advances in geometrical parametrization and reduced order models and methods for computational fluid dynamics problems in applied sciences and engineering: overview and perspectives , 2016 .

[9]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Advances in reduced order methods for parametric industrial problems in computational fluid dynamics , 2018, 1811.08319.

[10]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Model Order Reduction by means of Active Subspaces and Dynamic Mode Decomposition for Parametric Hull Shape Design Hydrodynamics , 2018, 1803.07377.

[11]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  An efficient shape parametrisation by free-form deformation enhanced by active subspace for hull hydrodynamic ship design problems in open source environment , 2018, 1801.06369.

[12]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Dimension reduction in heterogeneous parametric spaces with application to naval engineering shape design problems , 2017, Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences.

[13]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Nonlinear Component Analysis as a Kernel Eigenvalue Problem , 1998, Neural Computation.

[14]  G. Rozza,et al.  Combined Parameter and Model Reduction of Cardiovascular Problems by Means of Active Subspaces and POD-Galerkin Methods , 2017, 1711.10884.

[15]  Qiqi Wang,et al.  Erratum: Active Subspace Methods in Theory and Practice: Applications to Kriging Surfaces , 2013, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[16]  Paul G. Constantine,et al.  Active Subspaces - Emerging Ideas for Dimension Reduction in Parameter Studies , 2015, SIAM spotlights.

[17]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  BladeX: Python Blade Morphing , 2019, J. Open Source Softw..