Variability in stroke motor outcome is explained by structural and functional integrity of the motor system

[1]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  New advances in the Clinica software platform for clinical neuroimaging studies , 2019 .

[2]  S. Cramer,et al.  Neuroimaging Identifies Patients Most Likely to Respond to a Restorative Stroke Therapy , 2018, Stroke.

[3]  C. Stinear.  Prediction of motor recovery after stroke: advances in biomarkers , 2017, The Lancet Neurology.

[4]  Leonid Churilov,et al.  Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable , 2017, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[5]  L. Cohen,et al.  Biomarkers of stroke recovery: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable , 2017, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[6]  N. Ward,et al.  Brain regions important for recovery after severe post-stroke upper limb paresis , 2017, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[7]  E. Roth,et al.  Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Research: Issues, Opportunities, and the National Institutes of Health StrokeNet. , 2017, Stroke.

[8]  Bokkyu Kim,et al.  Can Neurological Biomarkers of Brain Impairment Be Used to Predict Poststroke Motor Recovery? A Systematic Review , 2017, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[9]  N. Ward,et al.  The contribution of lesion location to upper limb deficit after stroke , 2016, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[10]  S. Cramer,et al.  Moving rehabilitation research forward: Developing consensus statements for rehabilitation and recovery research , 2016, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[11]  Matthew A Petoe,et al.  Proportional recovery after stroke depends on corticomotor integrity , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[12]  J W Krakauer,et al.  The proportional recovery rule for stroke revisited , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[13]  Steven A Kautz,et al.  Corticospinal tract lesion load: An imaging biomarker for stroke motor outcomes , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[14]  Lucy Dodakian,et al.  Connectivity measures are robust biomarkers of cortical function and plasticity after stroke. , 2015, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Chunshui Yu,et al.  Enhanced Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity Compensates for Anatomical Connection Damages in Subcortical Stroke , 2015, Stroke.

[16]  G. Fink,et al.  Motor cortex excitability and connectivity in chronic stroke: a multimodal model of functional reorganization , 2015, Brain Structure and Function.

[17]  Babak Shahbaba,et al.  Neural function, injury, and stroke subtype predict treatment gains after stroke , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[18]  Shahabeddin Vahdat,et al.  Structural and Resting-State Brain Connectivity of Motor Networks After Stroke , 2015, Stroke.

[19]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Resting State Interhemispheric Motor Connectivity and White Matter Integrity Correlate with Motor Impairment in Chronic Stroke , 2013, Front. Neurol..

[20]  M. Seghier,et al.  Can fully automated detection of corticospinal tract damage be used in stroke patients? , 2013, Neurology.

[21]  Thomas R. Knösche,et al.  White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: The do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI , 2013, NeuroImage.

[22]  S. Cramer,et al.  Biomarkers and Predictors of Restorative Therapy Effects After Stroke , 2013, Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports.

[23]  Christian Grefkes,et al.  Cerebral network disorders after stroke: evidence from imaging‐based connectivity analyses of active and resting brain states in humans , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  Matthew Petoe,et al.  The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Upstream Dysfunction of Somatomotor Functional Connectivity After Corticospinal Damage in Stroke , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[26]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation , 2011, The Lancet.

[27]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Longitudinal Changes of Resting-State Functional Connectivity During Motor Recovery After Stroke , 2011, Stroke.

[28]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Anatomy of Stroke Injury Predicts Gains From Therapy , 2011, Stroke.

[29]  Robert Lindenberg,et al.  Lesion Load of the Corticospinal Tract Predicts Motor Impairment in Chronic Stroke , 2010, Stroke.

[30]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Resting interhemispheric functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity predicts performance after stroke , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[31]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  M. Levin,et al.  What Do Motor “Recovery” and “Compensation” Mean in Patients Following Stroke? , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[33]  Peter A. Calabresi,et al.  Tract probability maps in stereotaxic spaces: Analyses of white matter anatomy and tract-specific quantification , 2008, NeuroImage.

[34]  N. Yozbatiran,et al.  A Standardized Approach to Performing the Action Research Arm Test , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[35]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Intrinsic Fluctuations within Cortical Systems Account for Intertrial Variability in Human Behavior , 2007, Neuron.

[36]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain , 2007, Nature.

[37]  W. Byblow,et al.  Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  Daniel M. Corcos,et al.  Three-dimensional locations and boundaries of motor and premotor cortices as defined by functional brain imaging: A meta-analysis , 2006, NeuroImage.

[39]  Guido Gerig,et al.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[40]  N. Ward.  Functional reorganization of the cerebral motor system after stroke , 2004, Current opinion in neurology.

[41]  G H Glover,et al.  Image‐based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[42]  P M Matthews,et al.  Relating MRI changes to motor deficit after ischemic stroke by segmentation of functional motor pathways. , 2000, Stroke.

[43]  R. Nudo.  Recovery after damage to motor cortical areas , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[44]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[45]  P. Stratford,et al.  Measuring Physical Impairment and Disability With the Chedoke‐McMaster Stroke Assessment , 1993, Stroke.

[46]  Linda Teri,et al.  6/Use of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale with Older Adults , 1986 .

[47]  W. Byblow,et al.  Proportional Recovery From Lower Limb Motor Impairment After Stroke , 2017, Stroke.

[48]  W. Byblow,et al.  Proportional Motor Recovery After Stroke: Implications for Trial Design , 2017, Stroke.

[49]  C. Winstein,et al.  Motor Lateralization Provides a Foundation for Predicting and Treating Non-paretic Arm Motor Deficits in Stroke. , 2016, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[50]  AlexanderThiel,et al.  Structural and Resting-State Brain Connectivity of Motor Networks After Stroke , 2015 .

[51]  N. Ramsey,et al.  Understanding upper limb recovery after stroke. , 2013, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[52]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. , 2004, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[53]  P. Celnik,et al.  Stroke Rehabilitation. , 2015, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[54]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Inter-individual Variability in the Capacity for Motor Recovery after Ischemic Stroke Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Additional Services and Information for Inter-individual Variability in the Capacity for Motor Recovery after Ischemic Stroke , 2022 .