A multiple discrete–continuous extreme value model: formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions

Several consumer demand choices are characterized by the choice of multiple alternatives simultaneously. An example of such a choice situation in activity-travel analysis is the type of discretionary (or leisure) activity to participate in and the duration of time investment of the participation. In this context, within a given temporal period (say a day or a week), an individual may decide to participate in multiple types of activities (for example, in-home social activities, out-of-home social activities, in-home recreational activities, out-of-home recreational activities, and out-of-home non-maintenance shopping activities). In this paper, we derive and formulate a utility theory-based model for discrete/continuous choice that assumes diminishing marginal utility as the level of consumption of any particular alternative increases (i.e., satiation). This assumption yields a multiple discreteness model (i.e., choice of multiple alternatives can occur simultaneously). This is in contrast to the standard discrete choice model that is based on assuming the absence of any diminishing marginal utility as the level of consumption of any alternative increases (i.e., no satiation), leading to the case of strictly single discreteness. The econometric model formulated here, which we refer to as the multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model, has a surprisingly simple and elegant closed form expression for the discrete-continuous probability of not consuming certain alternatives and consuming given levels of the remaining alternatives. To our knowledge, we are the first to develop such a simple and powerful closed-form model for multiple discreteness in the literature. This formulation should constitute an important milestone in the area of multiple discreteness, just as the multinomial logit (MNL) represented an important milestone in the area of single discreteness. Further, the MDCEV model formulated here has the appealing property that it collapses to the familiar multinomial logit (MNL) choice model in the case of single discreteness. Finally, heteroscedasticity and/or correlation in unobserved characteristics affecting the demand of different alternatives can be easily incorporated within the MDCEV model framework using a mixing approach. The MDCEV model and its mixed variant are applied to analyze time-use allocation decisions among a variety of discretionary activities on weekends using data from the 2000 San Francisco Bay Area survey.

[1]  Kaivan Munshi Urban passenger travel demand estimation: A household activity approach , 1993 .

[2]  R. Kitamura,et al.  An analysis of time allocation to in-home and out-of-home discretionary activities across working days and non- working days , 1999 .

[3]  Xin Ye,et al.  An Exploration of the Relationship Between Mode Choice and Complexity of Trip Chaining Patterns , 2007 .

[4]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Multiple Response Data , 2003 .

[5]  Lung-fei Lee On Efficiency of Methods of Simulated Moments and Maximum Simulated Likelihood Estimation of Discrete Response Models , 1992, Econometric Theory.

[6]  Nancy McGuckin,et al.  Driving to Distractions: Recreational Trips in Private Vehicles , 2000 .

[7]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Comprehensive Econometric Microsimulator for Daily Activity-Travel Patterns , 2004 .

[8]  A. M. Lockwood,et al.  On Distinguishing Between Physically Active and Physically Passive Episodes and Between Travel and Activity Episodes: An Analysis of Weekend Recreational Participation in the San Francisco Bay Area , 2004 .

[9]  C. Bhat Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences , 2003 .

[10]  Ram M. Pendyala,et al.  Time use and activity perspectives in travel behavior research , 2002 .

[11]  F. Thomas Juster,et al.  Rethinking utility theory , 1990 .

[12]  S. Hoffman A Treatise on the Family , 2000 .

[13]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  A Hierarchical Bayes Model of Primary and Secondary Demand , 1998 .

[14]  P M Allaman,et al.  New approaches to understanding travel behavior , 1982 .

[15]  S. Fujii,et al.  A DISCRETE-CONTINUOUS ANALYSIS OF TIME ALLOCATION TO TWO TYPES OF DISCRETIONARY ACTIVITIES WHICH ACCOUNTS FOR UNOBSERVED HETEROGENEITY , 1996 .

[16]  Jeffrey A. Dubin,et al.  An Econometric Analysis of Residential Electric Appliance Holdings and Consumption , 1984 .

[17]  Paul A. Ruud,et al.  Handbook of Econometrics: Classical Estimation Methods for LDV Models Using Simulation , 1993 .

[18]  W. Hanemann Discrete-Continuous Models of Consumer Demand , 1984 .

[19]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  Experiences with developing ALBATROSS: a learning-based transportation oriented simulation system , 1998 .

[20]  Italo Meloni,et al.  Time allocation to discretionary in-home, out-of-home activities and to trips , 2004 .

[21]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A retrospective and prospective survey of time-use research , 1999 .

[22]  Wendy Lee Gramm Household Utility Maximization and the Working Wife , 1975 .

[23]  C. Bhat,et al.  A Mixed Multinomial Logit Model Analysis of Weekend Recreational Episode Type Choice , 2004 .

[24]  Jean-Pierre Dubé Multiple Discreteness and Product Differentiation: Demand for Carbonated Soft Drinks , 2004 .

[25]  J. Walsh Flexibility in Consumer Purchasing for Uncertain Future Tastes , 1995 .

[26]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  A learning-based transportation oriented simulation system , 2004 .

[27]  S. Srinivasan,et al.  A multidimensional mixed ordered-response model for analyzing weekend activity participation , 2005 .

[28]  E. I. Pas,et al.  Socio-demographics, activity participation and travel behavior , 1999 .

[29]  W. Eichhorn,et al.  Measurement in Economics , 1988 .

[30]  Sunil Gupta,et al.  The Shopping Basket: A Model for Multicategory Purchase Incidence Decisions , 1999 .

[31]  J. Mincer,et al.  Labor Force Participation of Married Women , 1962 .

[32]  I. Hendel,et al.  Estimating Multiple-Discrete Choice Models: An Application to Computeri-Zzation Returns , 1994 .

[33]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Analyzing Frequencies of Several Types of Events: A Mixed Multinomial-Poisson Approach , 1990 .

[34]  D. McFadden,et al.  MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE , 2000 .

[35]  George Baltas,et al.  A model for multiple brand choice , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Discretionary activity time allocation of individuals between in-home and out-of-home and between weekdays and weekends , 1999 .

[37]  Chandra R. Bhat A model of post home-arrival activity participation behavior , 1998 .

[38]  D Damm,et al.  A Theory of Activity Scheduling Behavior , 1981 .

[39]  Reuben Gronau,et al.  The Intrafamily Allocation of Time: The Value of the Housewives' Time , 1973 .

[40]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Modeling Consumer Demand for Variety , 2002 .

[41]  C. A. Guevara,et al.  BEHIND THE SUBJECTIVE VALUE OF TRAVEL TIME SAVINGS: THE PERCEPTION OF WORK, LEISURE AND TRAVEL. , 2001 .

[42]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  Investigating Purchase Incidence, Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Decisions of Households , 1993 .

[43]  J. Chiang A Simultaneous Approach to the Whether, What and How Much to Buy Questions , 1991 .

[44]  S. Jara-Díaz On the goods-activities technical relations in the time allocation theory , 2003 .