Multi-dynamic range compressional wave detection using optical-frequency comb

Compressional wave detection is useful means for health monitoring of building, detection of abnormal vibration of moving objects, defect evaluation, and biomedical imaging such as echography and photoacoustic imaging. The frequency of the compressional wave is varied from quasi-static to a few tens of megahertz depending on applications. Since the dynamic range of general compressional wave detectors is limited, we need to choose a proper compressional wave detector depending on applications. For the compressional wave detection with wide dynamic range, two or more detectors with different detection ranges is required. However, these detectors with different detection ranges generally has different accuracy and precision, disabling the seamless detection over these detection ranges. In this study, we proposed a compressional wave detector employing optical frequency comb (OFC). The compressional wave was sensed with a part of an OFC cavity, being encoded into OFC. The spectrally encoded OFC was converted to radio-frequency by the frequency link nature of OFC. The compressional wave-encoded radio-frequency can therefore be directly measured with a high-speed photodetector. To enhance the dynamic range of the compressional wave detection, we developed a cavityfeedback-based system and a phase-sensitive detection system, both of which the accuracy and precision are coherently linked to these of the OFC. We provided a proof-of-principle demonstration of the detection of compressional wave from quasi-static to ultrasound wave by using the OFC-based compressional wave sensor. Our proposed approach will serve as a unique and powerful tool for detecting compressional wave versatile applications in the future.

[1]  Takeshi Yasui,et al.  Optical-frequency-comb based ultrasound sensor , 2017, BiOS.

[2]  K. Minoshima,et al.  Strain sensing with a disturbance/RF-converting fiber comb cavity , 2016, 2016 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[3]  Luc Thévenaz,et al.  Review and Progress on Distributed Fibre Sensing , 2006 .

[4]  Ekaterina I. Galanzha,et al.  Photothermal and photoacoustic Raman cytometry in vitro and in vivo , 2010, Optics express.

[5]  Chi-Kuang Sun,et al.  Nonlinear photoacoustic microscopy via a loss modulation technique: from detection to imaging. , 2014, Optics express.

[6]  Qingming Luo,et al.  Multiscale photoacoustic microscopy with continuously tunable resolution. , 2014, Optics letters.

[7]  Jean-Pierre Monchalin,et al.  Non-contact biomedical photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging. , 2012, Journal of biomedical optics.

[8]  T. Hänsch,et al.  Optical frequency metrology , 2002, Nature.

[9]  Takeshi Yasui,et al.  Strain sensing based on strain to radio-frequency conversion of optical frequency comb. , 2018, Optics express.

[10]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Second generation optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy , 2011, BiOS.

[11]  Benjamin S. Goldschmidt,et al.  Evanescent Field Based Photoacoustics: Optical Property Evaluation at Surfaces , 2016, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[12]  Hall,et al.  Direct link between microwave and optical frequencies with a 300 THz femtosecond laser comb , 2000, Physical review letters.

[13]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Photoacoustic imaging and characterization of the microvasculature. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[14]  Masaaki Sakakura,et al.  Photoacoustic microscopy using ultrashort pulses with two different pulse durations. , 2014, Optics express.

[15]  Hao Li,et al.  A transparent broadband ultrasonic detector based on an optical micro-ring resonator for photoacoustic microscopy , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Photoacoustic Tomography: In Vivo Imaging from Organelles to Organs , 2012, Science.