Stack Overflow (SO) is the largest Q&A website for developers, providing a huge amount of copyable code snippets. Using these snippets raises various maintenance and legal issues. The SO license requires attribution, i.e., referencing the original question or answer, and requires derived work to adopt a compatible license. While there is a heated debate on SO's license model for code snippets and the required attribution, little is known about the extent to which snippets are copied from SO without proper attribution. In this paper, we present the research design and summarized results of an empirical study analyzing attributed and unattributed usages of SO code snippets in GitHub projects. On average, 3.22% of all analyzed repositories and 7.33% of the popular ones contained a reference to SO. Further, we found that developers rather refer to the whole thread on SO than to a specific answer. For Java, at least two thirds of the copied snippets were not attributed.
[1]
Scott R. Klemmer,et al.
Example-centric programming: integrating web search into the development environment
,
2010,
CHI.
[2]
Cristina V. Lopes,et al.
From Query to Usable Code: An Analysis of Stack Overflow Code Snippets
,
2016,
2016 IEEE/ACM 13th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR).
[3]
Christopher Vendome,et al.
A Large Scale Study of License Usage on GitHub
,
2015,
2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering.
[4]
Georgios Gousios,et al.
The GHTorent dataset and tool suite
,
2013,
2013 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR).