Status of accommodative intraocular lenses

Purpose of review This review examines the recent peer-reviewed literature of the past 18 months, with the goal of providing an overview of the pseudophakic lenses designed to provide accommodative action. Accommodative lenses take advantage of axial movement, refractive change and bag filling to provide their effect. Single and dual optic design, as well as unique technologies, were reviewed. Recent findings An overview is presented of the various accommodative lenses available for investigation and use. There is positive evidence that current accommodative intraocular lenses provide superior potential for near vision compared with standard intraocular lenses. Summary The available data suggest that accommodative amplitude and pseudoaccommodation are both important factors in the functional ability of accommodative intraocular lenses to provide a range of distance, intermediate and near vision.

[1]  L. Buratto,et al.  Accommodative Intraocular Lenses: Short-Term Visual Results of Two Different Lens Types , 2006, European journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  Faezeh Mona Sarfarazi,et al.  Sarfarazi dual optic accommodative intraocular lens. , 2006, Ophthalmology clinics of North America.

[3]  Jay Wei,et al.  Static and dynamic analysis of the anterior segment with optical coherence tomography , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  Nhung X Nguyen,et al.  Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[5]  J. Marshall,et al.  Objective measurement of intraocular lens movement and dioptric change with a focus shift accommodating intraocular lens , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  Adrian Glasser,et al.  Restoration of accommodation. , 2006, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[7]  A Vogel,et al.  [Experimental studies of the risks of endocapsular polymerization of injectable intraocular lenses]. , 1995, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[8]  J. Ben-nun,et al.  The NuLens accommodating intraocular lens. , 2006, Ophthalmology clinics of North America.

[9]  Murat Dogru,et al.  Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[10]  Nhung X Nguyen,et al.  Theoretical and measured pseudophakic accommodation after implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. , 2003, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  M. Snead,et al.  Pseudophakic accommodation? A study of the stability of capsular bag supported, one piece, rigid tripod, or soft flexible implants. , 1990, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  Wolfgang Drexler,et al.  Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes. , 2005 .

[13]  V. Portney,et al.  A dual optic accommodating foldable intraocular lens , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  H. Hayashi,et al.  Quantitative comparison of posterior capsule opacification after polymethylmethacrylate, silicone, and soft acrylic intraocular lens implantation. , 1998, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  H Burkhard Dick,et al.  Single optic accommodative intraocular lenses. , 2006, Ophthalmology clinics of North America.

[16]  Achim Langenbucher,et al.  Pseudophakic accommodation with translation lenses – dual optic vs mono optic , 2004, Ophthalmic & physiological optics.

[17]  Sverker Norrby,et al.  Artificial crystalline lens. , 2006, Ophthalmology clinics of North America.

[18]  Wolfgang Drexler,et al.  Pilocarpine‐induced shift of an accommodating intraocular lens: AT‐45 Crystalens , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[19]  O. Nishi,et al.  Accommodation amplitude after lens refilling with injectable silicone by sealing the capsule with a plug in primates. , 1998, Archives of ophthalmology.

[20]  W Drexler,et al.  Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[21]  Nhung X Nguyen,et al.  Stability of refraction, accommodation, and lens position after implantation of the 1CU accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[22]  R. Steinert,et al.  A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[23]  Hiroshi Uozato,et al.  Accommodation obtained per 1.0 mm forward movement of a posterior chamber intraocular lens , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[24]  S. Pieh,et al.  Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses , 2001, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  D J Coleman,et al.  On the hydraulic suspension theory of accommodation. , 1986, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[26]  J. Marshall,et al.  Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  Y. Yamada,et al.  Accommodative intraocular lens with spring action--Part 2. Fixation in the living rabbit. , 1992, Ophthalmic surgery.

[28]  Nhung X Nguyen,et al.  Implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. , 2002, Journal of refractive surgery.

[29]  G. Sanderson,et al.  Apparent accommodation and depth of field in pseudophakia , 1996, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[30]  M. Tetz,et al.  Refractive lensectomy and accommodating lens implantation in a case of hyperopia. , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[31]  M. Macsai,et al.  Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[32]  O. Nishi,et al.  Capsule opacification after refilling the capsule with an inflatable endocapsular balloon , 1997, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[33]  J. Alió,et al.  Some factors governing the efficacy of positional pseudoaccommodative intraocular lenses. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[34]  T. Oshika,et al.  Cumulative probability of neodymium:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy after phacoemulsification , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[35]  Ed Geraghty,et al.  Effect of intraocular lens implantation on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and depth of focus , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[36]  H Burkhard Dick,et al.  Accommodative intraocular lenses: current status , 2005, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[37]  O. Schwenn,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and glare disability by halogen light after monofocal and multifocal lens implantation , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[38]  Emilio Pedrotti,et al.  Ultrasound biomicroscopic changes during accommodation in eyes with accommodating intraocular lenses: Pilot study and hypothesis for the mechanism of accommodation , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[39]  J S Wolffsohn,et al.  Subjective and objective performance of the Lenstec KH-3500 “accommodative” intraocular lens , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[40]  J KESSLER,et al.  EXPERIMENTS IN REFILLING THE LENS. , 1964, Archives of ophthalmology.

[41]  J S Cumming,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens: results of feasibility and the initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[42]  Y. Yamada,et al.  Accommodative intraocular lens with spring action. Part 1. Design and placement in an excised animal eye. , 1990, Ophthalmic surgery.

[43]  Sunil Shah,et al.  Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[44]  Achim Langenbucher,et al.  Accommodation after Nd: YAG capsulotomy in patients with accommodative posterior chamber lens 1CU , 2005, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[45]  M R Dana,et al.  A systematic overview of the incidence of posterior capsule opacification. , 1998, Ophthalmology.