Intent Prediction of Multi-axial Ankle Motion Using Limited EMG Signals

Background: In this study, different intent prediction strategies were explored with the objective of determining the best approach to predicting continuous multi-axial user motion based solely on surface EMG (electromyography) data. These strategies were explored as the first step to better facilitating control of a multi-axis transtibial powered prosthesis. Methods: Based on data acquired from gait experiments, different data sets, prediction approaches and classification algorithms were explored. The effect of varying EMG electrode positioning was also tested. EMG data measured from three lower leg muscles was the sole data type used for making intent predictions. The motions to be predicted were along both the sagittal plane (foot dorsiflexion and plantarflexion) and the frontal plane (foot eversion and inversion). Results: The deviation of EMG data from its optimal pattern led to a decrease in prediction accuracy of up to 23%. However, using features that were calculated based on a participant's specific walking pattern limited this loss of prediction accuracy as a result of EMG electrode placement. A decoupled data set, one wherein the terrain type was accounted for beforehand, yielded the highest intent prediction accuracy of 77.2%. Conclusions: The results of this study highlighted the challenges faced when using very limited EMG data to predict multi-axial ankle motion. They also indicated that approaches that are more user-centric by design could led to more accurate motion predictions, possibly enabling more intuitive control.

[1]  D. Winter Biomechanical motor patterns in normal walking. , 1983, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  J. F. Yang,et al.  Electromyographic amplitude normalization methods: improving their sensitivity as diagnostic tools in gait analysis. , 1984, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  Aaron J. Young,et al.  Analysis of using EMG and mechanical sensors to enhance intent recognition in powered lower limb prostheses , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[4]  J. Delisa Gait analysis in the science of rehabilitation , 1998 .

[5]  M. Goldfarb,et al.  Control of Stair Ascent and Descent With a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  An Experimental Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis Using Proportional Myoelectric Control , 2014 .

[7]  Thomas Sugar,et al.  Robotic transtibial prosthesis with biomechanical energy regeneration , 2009, Ind. Robot.

[8]  Jason D. Miller,et al.  Myoelectric Walking Mode Classification for Transtibial Amputees , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits , 2008, Neural Networks.

[10]  Joseph M Czerniecki,et al.  Co-contraction patterns of trans-tibial amputee ankle and knee musculature during gait , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[11]  Jing Wang,et al.  Proportional EMG control of ankle plantar flexion in a powered transtibial prosthesis , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[12]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  Robotic leg control with EMG decoding in an amputee with nerve transfers. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Myoelectric control systems - A survey , 2007, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[14]  T.G. Sugar,et al.  SPARKy 3: Design of an active robotic ankle prosthesis with two actuated degrees of freedom using regenerative kinetics , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[15]  Kevin B. Fite,et al.  EMG control of a bionic knee prosthesis: Exploiting muscle co-contractions for improved locomotor function , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[16]  Ann M. Simon,et al.  A Training Method for Locomotion Mode Prediction Using Powered Lower Limb Prostheses , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  P. Bonato,et al.  An EMG-position controlled system for an active ankle-foot prosthesis: an initial experimental study , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[18]  Alena M. Grabowski,et al.  Bionic ankle–foot prosthesis normalizes walking gait for persons with leg amputation , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Long Wang,et al.  On the Design of a Powered Transtibial Prosthesis With Stiffness Adaptable Ankle and Toe Joints , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[20]  Mark Halaki,et al.  Normalization of EMG Signals: To Normalize or Not to Normalize and What to Normalize to? , 2012 .

[21]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Volitional Control of a Prosthetic Knee Using Surface Electromyography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  T. Current,et al.  Preliminary investigation of residual limb plantarflexion and dorsiflexion muscle activity during treadmill walking for trans-tibial amputees , 2012, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[23]  L J Hargrove,et al.  Online adaptive neural control of a robotic lower limb prosthesis , 2018, Journal of neural engineering.

[24]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Design and Validation of the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic (AMP-) Foot 2.0 , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[25]  Daniel P Ferris,et al.  Muscle activation patterns during walking from transtibial amputees recorded within the residual limb-prosthetic interface , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[26]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics , 1997 .

[27]  J. Friedman,et al.  Construction of Trees from a Learning Sample , 2017 .

[28]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Multiclass Real-Time Intent Recognition of a Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  Long Wang,et al.  Motion control of a robotic transtibial prosthesis during transitions between level ground and stairs , 2014, 2014 European Control Conference (ECC).

[30]  D. Winter,et al.  EMG profiles during normal human walking: stride-to-stride and inter-subject variability. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[31]  Kenton R. Kaufman,et al.  Cable-Driven Two Degrees-of-Freedom Ankle–Foot Prosthesis , 2016 .

[32]  A. M. Simon,et al.  Real-time myoelectric control of knee and ankle motions for transfemoral amputees. , 2011, JAMA.

[33]  Nicholas P. Fey,et al.  Classifying the intent of novel users during human locomotion using powered lower limb prostheses , 2013, 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[34]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Continuous Locomotion-Mode Identification for Prosthetic Legs Based on Neuromuscular–Mechanical Fusion , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  He Huang,et al.  A Strategy for Identifying Locomotion Modes Using Surface Electromyography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  C. D. Hoover,et al.  Stair Ascent With a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis Under Direct Myoelectric Control , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.