PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF COGENERATION PLANTS

In this paper, performance assessment of various building cogeneration systems is conducted through energy and exergy efficiencies. The cogeneration plants considered include steam-turbine system, gas-turbine system, diesel-engine system, and geothermal system. Here, the cogeneration operation refers to the simultaneous generation of electrical power and heating for buildings (especially for space heating and hot water). Selected actual operating data are employed for analysis and performance assessment. The same amount of electrical and thermal product outputs is considered for all systems, except the diesel, to facilitate comparisons. Also, the effects of certain operating parameters (e.g., steam pressure, water temperature) on the energy and exergy efficiencies are investigated. The diesel-engine and geothermal systems appear to be thermodynamically more attractive, in that they have higher exergy efficiencies, than steam-turbine and gas-turbine systems. The results demonstrate that exergy analysis is a useful tool in performance assessments of cogeneration systems and permits meaningful comparisons of different cogeneration systems based on their merits. Such results can allow the efficiency of cogeneration systems to be increased, and the applications of cogeneration in larger energy systems to be configured more beneficially, leading to reductions in fuel use and environmental emissions.

[1]  Mehmet Kanoglu,et al.  Economic evaluation of geothermal power generation, heating, and cooling , 1999 .

[2]  E. Barbier Nature and technology of geothermal energy: A review , 1997 .

[3]  Willard W. Pulkrabek,et al.  Engineering Fundamentals of the Internal Combustion Engine , 1997 .

[4]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Performance investigation of two geothermal district heating systems for building applications: Energy analysis , 2006 .

[5]  R. W. Barnes,et al.  Cogeneration of electricity and useful heat , 1980 .

[6]  Yasin Ust,et al.  Optimization of a regenerative gas-turbine cogeneration system based on a new exergetic performance criterion: Exergetic performance coefficient , 2007 .

[7]  Willard W. Pulkrabek,et al.  Engineering Fundamentals of the Internal Combustion Engine, 2nd Ed. , 2004 .

[8]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Efficiency analysis of a cogeneration and district energy system , 2005 .

[9]  Mehmet Kanoglu,et al.  Improving the performance of an existing air-cooled binary geothermal power plant : A case study , 1999 .

[10]  Ivar S. Ertesvåg,et al.  Exergetic comparison of efficiency indicators for combined heat and power (CHP) , 2007 .

[11]  Abdul Khaliq,et al.  Energetic and exergetic efficiency analysis of an indirect fired air-turbine combined heat and power system , 2007 .

[12]  T. A. Brzustowski,et al.  Second-Law Analysis of Energy Processes Part IV: The Exergy of Hydrocarbon Fuels* , 1986 .

[13]  Mehmet Kanoglu,et al.  Incorporating a District Heating/Cooling System Into an Existing Geothermal Power Plant , 1998 .

[14]  Mehmet Kanogˇlu,et al.  Performance characteristics of a Diesel engine power plant , 2005 .

[15]  Michel Feidt,et al.  Energy cogeneration systems and energy management strategy , 1998 .

[16]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  Energy- and exergy-based comparison of coal-fired and nuclear steam power plants , 2001 .

[17]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  Reductions in energy use and environmental emissions achievable with utility-based cogeneration: Simplified illustrations for Ontario , 1998 .

[18]  Jan Szargut,et al.  Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical, and Metallurgical Processes , 1988 .