Which Neuronal Elements are Activated Directly by Spinal Cord Stimulation

The purpose of this paper is to discuss which nerve fibers in the various quadrants of the spinal cord are immediately activated under normal conditions of spinal cord stimulation, ie, at voltages within the therapeutic range. The conclusions are based on both empirical and computer modeling data. The recruitment of dorsal column (DC) fibers is most likely restricted to Aβ fibers with a diameter ≥ 10.7 μm in a 0.20–0.25 mm layer under the pia mater and fibers of 9.4–10.7 μm in an even smaller outer layer when a conventional SCS lead is used. In a 0.25‐mm outer layer of the T11 segment the number of Aβ fibers ≥ 10.7 μm, as estimated in a recent morphometric study, is about 56 in each DC. Because a DC at T11 innervates 12 dermatomes, a maximum of 4–5 fibers (≥ 10.7 μm) may be recruited in each dermatome near the discomfort threshold. The dermatome activated just below the discomfort threshold is likely to be stimulated by just a single fiber, suggesting that paresthesia and pain relief may be effected in a dermatome by the stimulation of a single large Aβ fiber. The depth of stimulation in the DCs, and thereby the number of recruited Aβ fibers, may be increased 2–3 fold when stimulation is applied by an optimized electrode configuration (a narrow bi/tripole or a transverse tripole). Assuming that the largest Aβ fibers in a dorsal root have a diameter of 15 μm, the smallest ones recruited at discomfort threshold would be 12 μm. The latter are presumably of proprioceptive origin and responsible for segmental reflexes and uncomfortable sensations. Furthermore, it is shown to be unlikely that, apart from dorsal roots and a thin outer layer of the DCs, any other spinal structures are recruited when stimulation is applied in the dorsal epidural space. Finally, anodal excitation and anodal propagation block are unlikely to occur with SCS.

[1]  J. Hunter,et al.  Segmental effects of epidural spinal cord stimulation in humans. , 1994, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  Jan Holsheimer,et al.  Computer modelling of spinal cord stimulation and its contribution to therapeutic efficacy , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[3]  Jiping He,et al.  Stimulation Usage Range for Chronic Pain Management , 1994 .

[4]  J. Struijk,et al.  Contact combinations in epidural spinal cord stimulation. A comparison by computer modeling. , 1991, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[5]  M. Dimitrijevic,et al.  Study of sensation and muscle twitch responses to spinal cord stimulation. , 1980, International Rehabilitation Medicine.

[6]  S L BeMent,et al.  A quantitative study of electrical stimulation of central myelinated fibers. , 1969, Experimental neurology.

[7]  J Holsheimer,et al.  Identification of the target neuronal elements in electrical deep brain stimulation , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[8]  G. Barolat Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation: Anatomical and Electrical Properties of the Intraspinal Structures Relevant to Spinal Cord Stimulation and Clinical Correlations , 1998, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[9]  R. Hoppenstein Electrical stimulation of the ventral and dorsal columns of the spinal cord for relief of chronic intractable pain: preliminary report. , 1975, Surgical neurology.

[10]  Barry Coburn,et al.  A Theoretical Study of Epidural Electrical Stimulation of the Spinal Cord - Part II: Effects on Long Myelinated Fibers , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  E Jankowska,et al.  Direct and indirect activation of nerve cells by electrical pulses applied extracellularly. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  J. Struijk,et al.  Contact Combinations in Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation , 1991 .

[13]  J. Law,et al.  Targeting a spinal stimulator to treat the 'failed back surgery syndrome'. , 1987, Applied neurophysiology.

[14]  G. Barolat Current Status of Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation , 1995 .

[15]  J. Law Spinal stimulation: statistical superiority of monophasic stimulation of narrowly separated, longitudinal bipoles having rostral cathodes. , 1983, Applied neurophysiology.

[16]  J. Holsheimer,et al.  Recruitment of dorsal column fibers in spinal cord stimulation: influence of collateral branching , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  J. Bullier,et al.  Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter I. Evidence from chronaxie measurements , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  J. Holsheimer,et al.  Excitation of dorsal root fibers in spinal cord stimulation: a theoretical study , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  A. Sances,et al.  A comparison between anterior and posterior spinal implant systems. , 1975, Surgical neurology.

[20]  J. Holsheimer Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Chronic Pain: Analysis of Technical Drawbacks and Solutions , 1997 .

[21]  J. Bloedel,et al.  Distribution of activity in spinal pathways evoked by experimental dorsal column stimulation. , 1975, Journal of neurosurgery.

[22]  R. North,et al.  Spinal cord stimulation with percutaneous and plate electrodes: side effects and quantitative comparisons. , 1997, Neurosurgical focus.

[23]  W A Wesselink,et al.  Clinical evaluation of paresthesia steering with a new system for spinal cord stimulation. , 1998, Neurosurgery.

[24]  J Holsheimer,et al.  Effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in the management of chronic pain: analysis of technical drawbacks and solutions. , 1997, Neurosurgery.

[25]  Hessel Wijkstra,et al.  Acute animal studies on the use of an anodal block to reduce urethral resistance in sacral root stimulation , 1994 .

[26]  J. Bullier,et al.  Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter II. Evidence from selective inactivation of cell bodies and axon initial segments , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  R Dengler,et al.  Axonal conduction velocity and force of single human motor units , 1988, Muscle & nerve.