Life after ponatinib failure: outcomes of chronic and accelerated phase CML patients who discontinued ponatinib in the salvage setting

Abstract Ponatinib is a pan-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with efficacy in multirefractory CML patients who have failed other TKIs. Despite excellent response rates, resistance or intolerance may develop. We conducted a retrospective review of the outcome of patients with chronic (CP) and accelerated (AP) phase CML refractory to prior TKI who discontinued ponatinib for resistance or intolerance. Nineteen CP patients, discontinued due to resistance (n = 13), toxicity (n = 5) and to pursue stem cell transplantation (n = 1). At discontinuation, 14 were still in CP, three had progressed to AP and two to blast phase (BP). Three CP patients improved their cytogenetic response (CyR) to complete CyR (CCyR), two after SCT and one on omacetaxine. None of the 12 patients, without a major cytogenetic response at ponatinib discontinuation, including all patients treated with subsequent TKIs, responded to therapy. Seventeen AP patients, stopped ponatinib due to resistance (n = 15) or intolerance (n = 2). At discontinuation, 14 were still in AP and three had progressed to BP. Four patients were treated with SCT and one achieved major molecular response. None of the 12 patients treated with non-SCT approaches responded to subsequent therapy. Median survival for all patients was 16.6 months after ponatinib discontinuation (31, 9 and 13 months for patients in CP, AP and BP, respectively). Median survival was 60 months for patients who discontinued ponatinib for toxicity and 11 months for those who discontinued for resistance. Long-term outcome of patients with ponatinib failure are poor with estimated one-year OS and EFS rates of 54% and 40%, respectively. New treatment options are required for this subset of patients.

[1]  M. Heinrich,et al.  Expanded Phase 1 Study of ABL001, a Potent, Allosteric Inhibitor of BCR-ABL, Reveals Significant and Durable Responses in Patients with CML-Chronic Phase with Failure of Prior TKI Therapy , 2016 .

[2]  A. Ganser,et al.  An EBMT Prospective Non-Interventional Study of Outcomes and Toxicity of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Previously Treated with Second Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors , 2016 .

[3]  T. Brümmendorf,et al.  Long‐term bosutinib for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of imatinib plus dasatinib and/or nilotinib , 2016, American journal of hematology.

[4]  C. Chai-Adisaksopha,et al.  Major arterial events in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a meta-analysis , 2016, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[5]  M. Breccia,et al.  Efficacy and safety of second-line ponatinib after failure of a single previous tyrosine kinase inhibitor for chronic myeloid leukemia patients in chronic phase , 2016, Haematologica.

[6]  T. Brümmendorf,et al.  Long‐term evaluation of cardiac and vascular toxicity in patients with Philadelphia chromosome‐positive leukemias treated with bosutinib , 2016, American journal of hematology.

[7]  M. Baccarani,et al.  4-year results of the ponatinib phase II PACE trial in patients (pts) with heavily pretreated leukemia. , 2016 .

[8]  J. Dogné,et al.  Association Between BCR-ABL Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Cardiovascular Events, Major Molecular Response, and Overall Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[9]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Final 5-Year Study Results of DASISION: The Dasatinib Versus Imatinib Study in Treatment-Naïve Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Trial. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  J. Hodgson,et al.  The impact of multiple low-level BCR-ABL1 mutations on response to ponatinib. , 2016, Blood.

[11]  I. Flinn,et al.  Long-term benefits and risks of frontline nilotinib vs imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 5-year update of the randomized ENESTnd trial , 2016, Leukemia.

[12]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Final analysis of the efficacy and safety of omacetaxine mepesuccinate in patients with chronic‐ or accelerated‐phase chronic myeloid leukemia: Results with 24 months of follow‐up , 2015, Cancer.

[13]  M. Baccarani,et al.  A review of the European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of CML , 2015, Annals of Hematology.

[14]  G. Saglio,et al.  The choice of first-line Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia treatment , 2015, Annals of Hematology.

[15]  R. Larson,et al.  BCR-ABL1 compound mutations combining key kinase domain positions confer clinical resistance to ponatinib in Ph chromosome-positive leukemia. , 2014, Cancer cell.

[16]  T. Brümmendorf,et al.  Bosutinib efficacy and safety in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia after imatinib resistance or intolerance: Minimum 24-month follow-up , 2014, American journal of hematology.

[17]  A. Quintás-Cardama,et al.  Ponatinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Ponatinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Implications of BCR-ABL1 kinase domain-mediated resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2014, Leukemia research.

[20]  T. Clackson,et al.  A phase 2 trial of ponatinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  P. Szankasi,et al.  BCR-ABL1 compound mutations in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant CML: frequency and clonal relationships. , 2013, Blood.

[22]  I. Flinn,et al.  Ponatinib in refractory Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Ponatinib in Patients with Accelerated Phase or Blast Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (AP-CML or BP-CML) or Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ ALL): 12-Month Follow-up of the PACE Trial , 2012 .

[24]  T. Clackson,et al.  Potent Activity of Ponatinib (AP24534) in Models of FLT3-Driven Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Other Hematologic Malignancies , 2011, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[25]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Predictive factors for outcome and response in patients treated with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after imatinib failure. , 2011, Blood.

[26]  K. Rezvani,et al.  Efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as third-line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase who have failed 2 prior lines of TKI therapy. , 2010, Blood.

[27]  Ricardo Pasquini,et al.  Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  Susan O'Brien,et al.  Results of dasatinib therapy in patients with early chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  J. Radich,et al.  Six-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for the first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia , 2010, Leukemia.

[30]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Nilotinib for the frontline treatment of Ph(+) chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2009, Blood.

[31]  Z. Estrov,et al.  The use of nilotinib or dasatinib after failure to 2 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors: long-term follow-up. , 2009, Blood.

[32]  T. Clackson,et al.  AP24534, a pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor for chronic myeloid leukemia, potently inhibits the T315I mutant and overcomes mutation-based resistance. , 2009, Cancer cell.

[33]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Dynamics of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia after sequential treatment with multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors. , 2007, Blood.

[34]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Outcome of patients with Philadelphia chromosome‐positive chronic myelogenous leukemia post‐imatinib mesylate failure , 2007, Cancer.

[35]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Dasatinib induces notable hematologic and cytogenetic responses in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of imatinib therapy. , 2007, Blood.

[36]  Hongyue Dai,et al.  Gene expression changes associated with progression and response in chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  N. Donato,et al.  BCR-ABL independence and LYN kinase overexpression in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells selected for resistance to STI571. , 2003, Blood.

[38]  C. Peschel,et al.  BCR-ABL gene mutations in relation to clinical resistance of Philadelphia-chromosome-positive leukaemia to STI571: a prospective study , 2002, The Lancet.