A reassessment of the human development index via data envelopment analysis

To consider different aspects of life when measuring human development, the United Nations Development Program introduced the Human Development Index (HDI). The HDI is a composite index of socioeconomic indicators that reflect three major dimensions of human development: longevity, knowledge and standard of living. In this paper, the assessment of the HDI is reconsidered in the light of data envelopment analysis (DEA). Instead of a simple rank of the countries, human development is benchmarked on the basis of empirical observations of best practice countries. First, on the same line as HDI, we develop a DEA-like model to assess the relative performance of the countries in human development. Then we extend our calculations with a post-DEA model to derive global estimates of a new development index by using common weights for the socioeconomic indicators. Finally, we introduce the transformation paradigm in the assessment of human development. We develop a DEA model to estimate the relative efficiency of the countries in converting income to knowledge and life opportunities.

[1]  David J. Mayston,et al.  Measuring and managing educational performance , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[2]  Prithwiraj Nath,et al.  Resource, service quality and performance triad: a framework for measuring efficiency of banking services , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[3]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[4]  C. Singer.  Human Development Report 2000 , 2001 .

[5]  Benjamin B. M. Shao,et al.  Productivity breakdown of the information and computing technology industries across countries , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[6]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Improving the discriminating power of DEA: focus on globally efficient units , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[7]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Measuring human development via data envelopment analysis: the case of Asia and the Pacific , 2005 .

[8]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[9]  Celia J. Renner,et al.  A DEA study of gender equity in executive compensation , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[10]  C. Juma,et al.  [The United Nations Development Program]. , 1969, Die Agnes Karll-Schwester, der Krankenpfleger.

[11]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[12]  Meghnad Desai,et al.  Human development:Concepts and measurement , 1991 .

[13]  Farhad Noorbakhsh,et al.  A Modified Human Development Index , 1998 .

[14]  Allen C. Kelley,et al.  The Human Development Index: "Handle with Care" , 1991 .

[15]  Eric Neumayer,et al.  The Human Development Index and Sustainability - A Constructive Proposal , 2001 .

[16]  Norman Hicks,et al.  Indicators of development: The search for a basic needs yardstick , 1979 .

[17]  A. Sagar,et al.  The human development index: a critical review , 1998 .

[18]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Evaluating performance of public–private research collaborations: A DEA analysis , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[19]  Stephen Haag,et al.  Efficient provision of child quality of life in less developed countries: conventional development indexes versus a programming approach to development indexes , 2000 .