Matching Markets: Theory and Practice
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] L. S. Shapley,et al. College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage , 2013, Am. Math. Mon..
[2] Fuhito Kojima,et al. School choice: Impossibilities for affirmative action , 2012, Games Econ. Behav..
[3] Parag A. Pathak,et al. The Mechanism Design Approach to Student Assignment , 2011 .
[4] Isa Emin Hafalir,et al. Effective affirmative action in school choice , 2011 .
[5] Parag A. Pathak,et al. School Admissions Reform in Chicago and England: Comparing Mechanisms by Their Vulnerability to Manipulation. NBER Working Paper No. 16783. , 2011 .
[6] Tayfun Sönmez,et al. Market Design for Kidney Exchange , 2011 .
[7] Onur Kesten. School Choice with Consent , 2010 .
[8] Jay Sethuraman,et al. Lotteries in Student Assignment: An Equivalence Result , 2010 .
[9] Lars Ehlers,et al. Efficient assignment respecting priorities , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.
[10] M. Utku Ünver,et al. Matching, Allocation, and Exchange of Discrete Resources , 2009 .
[11] Flip Klijn,et al. Constrained school choice , 2009, J. Econ. Theory.
[12] Yeon-Koo Che,et al. Resolving Conflicting Preferences in School Choice: The 'Boston' Mechanism Reconsidered , 2009 .
[13] Parag A. Pathak,et al. Strategy-Proofness versus Efficiency in Matching with Indifferences: Redesigning the NYC High School Match , 2009 .
[14] L. Dubins. Resolving Conflicting Preferences in School Choice : The “ Boston , 2009 .
[15] Parag A. Pathak,et al. Leveling the Playing Field: Sincere and Sophisticated Players in the Boston Mechanism , 2008 .
[16] Aytek Erdil,et al. What's the Matter with Tie-Breaking? Improving Efficiency in School Choice , 2008 .
[17] M. Utku Ünver,et al. Efficient Kidney Exchange: Coincidence of Wants in a Markets with Compatibility-Based Preferences , 2009 .
[18] Yu Wang,et al. The Relationship between Top Trading Cycles Mechanism and Top Trading Cycles and Chains Mechanism , 2007, J. Econ. Theory.
[19] M. Utku Ünver,et al. Games of Capacity Manipulation in Hospital-intern Markets , 2006, Soc. Choice Welf..
[20] Tayfun Sönmez,et al. Games of school choice under the Boston mechanism , 2006 .
[21] L. Ehlers,et al. Respecting Priorities when Assigning Students to Schools , 2006 .
[22] Parag A. Pathak,et al. Changing the Boston School Choice Mechanism: Strategy-proofness as Equal Access , 2006 .
[23] Atila Abdulkadiroglu,et al. College admissions with affirmative action , 2005, Int. J. Game Theory.
[24] Paul R. Milgrom,et al. Matching with Contracts , 2005 .
[25] Parag A. Pathak,et al. The Boston Public School Match , 2005 .
[26] Parag A. Pathak,et al. The New York City High School Match , 2005 .
[27] Alvin E. Roth,et al. Pairwise Kidney Exchange , 2004, J. Econ. Theory.
[28] Tayfun Sönmez,et al. House Allocation with Existing Tenants: An Equivalence , 2001, Games Econ. Behav..
[29] F. Delmonico,et al. Exchanging kidneys--advances in living-donor transplantation. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.
[30] Atila Abdulkadiroglu,et al. School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach , 2003 .
[31] H. Ergin. Efficient Resource Allocation on the Basis of Priorities , 2002 .
[32] Hervé Moulin,et al. A New Solution to the Random Assignment Problem , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.
[33] J. P. Davis,et al. Consensus statement on the live organ donor. , 2000, JAMA.
[34] L. Ross,et al. Ethical issues in increasing living kidney donations by expanding kidney paired exchange programs. , 2000, Transplantation.
[35] Atila Abdulkadiroglu,et al. HOUSE ALLOCATION WITH EXISTING TENANTS , 1999 .
[36] M. Balinski,et al. A Tale of Two Mechanisms: Student Placement , 1999 .
[37] Atila Abdulkadiroglu,et al. RANDOM SERIAL DICTATORSHIP AND THE CORE FROM RANDOM ENDOWMENTS IN HOUSE ALLOCATION PROBLEMS , 1998 .
[38] G Opelz,et al. Impact of HLA compatibility on survival of kidney transplants from unrelated live donors. , 1997, Transplantation.
[39] Tayfun Sönmez,et al. Manipulation via Capacities in Two-Sided Matching Markets , 1997 .
[40] L. Ross,et al. Ethics of a paired-kidney-exchange program. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.
[41] José Alcalde,et al. Top dominance and the possibility of strategy-proof stable solutions to matching problems , 1994 .
[42] Jinpeng Ma. Strategy-proofness and the strict core in a market with indivisibilities , 1994 .
[43] Alvin E. Roth,et al. Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis , 1990 .
[44] Alvin E. Roth,et al. The College Admissions Problem Revisited , 1989 .
[45] N Bilgin,et al. Living unrelated donor kidney transplantation. , 1992, Transplantation Proceedings.
[46] A. Roth. On the Allocation of Residents to Rural Hospitals: A General Property of Two-Sided Matching Markets , 1986 .
[47] F T Rapaport,et al. The case for a living emotionally related international kidney donor exchange registry. , 1986, Transplantation proceedings.
[48] David Gale,et al. Ms. Machiavelli and the Stable Matching Problem , 1985 .
[49] A. Roth. Misrepresentation and stability in the marriage problem , 1984 .
[50] A. Roth. The Evolution of the Labor Market for Medical Interns and Residents: A Case Study in Game Theory , 1984, Journal of Political Economy.
[51] Alvin E. Roth,et al. The Economics of Matching: Stability and Incentives , 1982, Math. Oper. Res..
[52] V. Crawford,et al. Job Matching, Coalition Formation, and Gross Substitutes , 1982 .
[53] David A. Freedman,et al. Machiavelli and the Gale-Shapley Algorithm , 1981 .
[54] V. Crawford,et al. Job Matching with Heterogeneous Firms and Workers , 1981 .
[55] R. Zeckhauser,et al. The Efficient Allocation of Individuals to Positions , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.
[56] Andrew Postlewaite,et al. Weak Versus Strong Domination in a Market with Indivisible Goods , 1977 .
[57] L. Shapley,et al. On cores and indivisibility , 1974 .
[58] L. Shapley,et al. The assignment game I: The core , 1971 .
[59] L. B. Wilson,et al. Stable marriage assignment for unequal sets , 1970 .