Computational Thinking and Participatory Teaching as Pathways to Personalized Learning

This chapter discusses personalized learning by briefly outlining historical trends and deficiencies associated with what can be referred to as production style or assembly line approaches to education before contrasting personalized learning definitions. The chapter extends those definitions. It discusses participatory teaching as a personalized learning strategy by which students take on roles of co-teaching, co-designing lessons, or co-designing curriculum with adult teachers. One participatory teaching example involves an international group of students who help one another learn science and mathematics through shared video production. This example involves a US school involved in a larger districtwide effort comprehensively designed to involve each student. Organized around computational thinking, multidisciplinary innovation, arts integration, and collaborative problem-solving, the district may be viewed as a case study in implementing personalized learning. The chapter furnishes several examples that blend participatory teaching and computational thinking.

[1]  Samuel Cohen,et al.  Personalizing Student Learning Using the MyEduDecks Application Through Teacher Supervision and Peer-to-Peer Networks , 2016, Revolutionizing Education with Digital Ink.

[2]  Jaekyung Lee.  Racial and Ethnic Achievement Gap Trends: Reversing the Progress Toward Equity? , 2002 .

[3]  Charles B. Hodges,et al.  Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy on Computational Thinking , 2017 .

[4]  John Maloney,et al.  The Scratch Programming Language and Environment , 2010, TOCE.

[5]  A. Damasio,et al.  We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. , 2007 .

[6]  Laurie F. Ruberg,et al.  A Future-Focused Education: Designed to Create the Innovators of Tomorrow , 2017, Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy on Computational Thinking.

[7]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective , 2006 .

[8]  Milton S. Goldberg,et al.  A Nation at Risk: The Report of the National Commission on Excellence in Education. , 1983 .

[9]  Christine Y. O'Sullivan.  NAEP 1996 Science Report Card for the Nation and the States. Findings from the National Assessment of Educational Progress. , 1997 .

[10]  Katerina Ananiadou,et al.  21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries , 2009 .

[11]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[12]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Does Schooling Increase or Reduce Social Inequality , 2015 .

[13]  Jeannette M. Wing.  An introduction to computer science for non-majors using principles of computation , 2007, SIGCSE.

[14]  Annie Murphy Paul.  The Coding Revolution. , 2016, Scientific American.

[15]  Ljubomir Perkovic,et al.  A framework for computational thinking across the curriculum , 2010, ITiCSE '10.

[16]  K. Mills.  A Review of the “Digital Turn” in the New Literacy Studies , 2010 .