The effect of varying low-dose protocols on perceived image quality in multidetector CT in a rabbit model of acute appendicitis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of multidetector CT (MD-CT) with low-dose protocols in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a rabbit model. Ten New Zealand white rabbits underwent ligation of the appendix. MD-CT (Siemens Somatom Plus 4 Volume Zoom) was performed using three low-dose protocols: 80 kV/70 mAs; 80 kV/50 mAs; and 80 kV/20 mAs. Axial and coronal reformations were performed. Three experienced radiologists evaluated the images using a four-grade score: (1) excellent; (2) good; (3) moderate; and (4) not sufficient. Diagnosis was confirmed histopathologically. The overall score for the 80 kV/70 mAs was 1, for the 80 kV/50 mAs protocol 1.3, and the 80 kV/20 mAs protocol reached an overall score of 2. The coronal reformations reached with 1.1 (80 kV/70 mAs), 1.2 (80 kV/50 mAs), and 1.4 (80 kV/20 mAs) had a slightly better median score than the axial reconstructions. In cases of inconclusive ultrasound and clinical presentation, the use of MD-CT can be considered when evaluating children for suspected appendicitis.

[1]  Jiang Hsieh.  Three-dimensional artifact induced by projection weighting and misalignment , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  L. Clarke,et al.  Acute appendicitis in women of childbearing age. , 1986, Archives of surgery.

[3]  James H Thrall,et al.  Clinical comparison of standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT: effect on image quality. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  W. Huda.  Dose and image quality in CT , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[5]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Computer-simulated radiation dose reduction for abdominal multidetector CT of pediatric patients. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  T. Fearon.  CT dose parameters and their limitations , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[7]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[8]  H. Morgan.  Dose reduction for CT pediatric imaging , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[9]  Ulrich Baum,et al.  Dose reduction in CT examination of children by an attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE Dose) , 2002, European Radiology.

[10]  E. Ron.  Let's not relive the past: a review of cancer risk after diagnostic or therapeutic irradiation , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[11]  M. Guelfguat,et al.  Acute appendicitis in children: comparison of clinical diagnosis with ultrasound and CT imaging , 2000, Pediatric Radiology.

[12]  Mathias Cohnen,et al.  Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning , 2003, European Radiology.

[13]  M. Galanski,et al.  Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey , 2003, European Radiology.

[14]  R. Novelline,et al.  Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. , 1997, Radiology.

[15]  A. J. Malone,et al.  Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  I. Kamel,et al.  Radiation dose reduction in CT of the pediatric pelvis. , 1994, Radiology.

[17]  Walter Huda,et al.  Effective doses to adult and pediatric patients , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[18]  Radiation dose reduction in CT: application to tissue area and volume determination. , 1998, Radiology.

[19]  R B Jeffrey,et al.  CT and sonographic evaluation of acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  Floriane C. Wu.  Appendicitis: Usefulness of us in diagnosis in a pediatric population , 1993 .

[21]  J. Yee,et al.  Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. , 1994, Radiology.

[22]  A. Gutman,et al.  Experimental model of acute appendicitis in the rabbit with determination of leucine amino peptidase (LAP) and acid phosphatase (acid-P) activities in portal blood samples. , 1990, The Journal of surgical research.

[23]  L. Incesu,et al.  Acute appendicitis: MR imaging and sonographic correlation. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  E. Hall,et al.  Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[25]  H. Carty.  Paediatric emergencies: non-traumatic abdominal emergencies , 2002, European Radiology.

[26]  R. Malt,et al.  Appendicitis Near Its Centenary , 1984, Annals of surgery.

[27]  J. Puylaert.  Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. , 1986, Radiology.

[28]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[29]  R. Vogelzang,et al.  CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis: imaging findings. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[30]  W Huda,et al.  Radiation effective doses to patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations. , 1999, Radiology.

[31]  B. Birnbaum,et al.  Appendicitis at the millennium. , 2000, Radiology.

[32]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  Acute appendicitis: high-resolution real-time US findings. , 1987, Radiology.

[33]  A. Dachman,et al.  Natural history of the obstructed rabbit appendix: observations with radiography, sonography, and CT. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[34]  J. Puylaert,et al.  Effect of ultrasonography and optional computed tomography on the outcome of appendectomy , 2003, European Radiology.

[35]  M. Siegel,et al.  Acute appendicitis in children: value of sonography in detecting perforation. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  J. K. Smith,et al.  Multidetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities. , 1998, Radiology.

[37]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Dose reduction in multidetector CT using attenuation-based online tube current modulation. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[38]  M. Prokop,et al.  US as a primary diagnostic tool in relation to negative appendectomy: six years experience. , 2003, Radiology.