Trying to become a different type of company: dynamic capability at Smith Corona

Smith Corona, formerly one of the world's leading manufacturers of typewriters, was challenged to exercise dynamic capability in the face of the dissipation of its main product category. A study of the last two decades of the life of the company shows how Smith Corona tried to alter its resource base by leveraging existing resources, creating new resources, accessing external resources, and releasing resources. Using the extended case method, this study advances dynamic capability theory by confronting it with an empirical case. The Smith Corona case provides rich insights into the resource alteration processes by which dynamic capability operates, and highlights resource cognition as a missing element in dynamic capability theory. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  S. Merriam.  Qualitative Case Studies , 2010 .

[2]  Erwin Danneels.  Organizational antecedents of second‐order competences , 2008 .

[3]  C. Frith.  Social cognition , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[5]  Georg Schreyögg,et al.  How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization , 2007 .

[6]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  THE PROCESS OF TECHNOLOGICAL COMPETENCE LEVERAGING , 2007 .

[7]  R. Gulati.  Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation ? , 2007 .

[8]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box , 2007 .

[9]  Kressel,et al.  Competing for the Future , 2007 .

[10]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[11]  S. Schulz-Hardt,et al.  Group decision making in hidden profile situations: dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Brand Concept Maps: A Methodology for Identifying Brand Association Networks , 2006 .

[13]  Erwin Danneels.  Dialogue on the Effects of Disruptive Technology on Firms and Industries , 2006 .

[14]  A. Edmondson,et al.  Everyday Failures In Organizational Learning: Explaining The High Threshold For Speaking Up At Work , 2006 .

[15]  Jerker Denrell,et al.  Managing Knowledge in the Dark: An Empirical Study of the Reliability of Capability Evaluations , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[16]  T. Meyvis,et al.  When Are Broader Brands Stronger Brands? An Accessibility Perspective on the Success of Brand Extensions , 2004 .

[17]  P. Barr,et al.  CURRENT AND POTENTIAL IMPORTANCE OF QUALITATIVE METHODS IN STRATEGY RESEARCH , 2004 .

[18]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  Balancing and Rebalancing in the Creation and Evolution of Organizational Control , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[19]  Erwin Danneels.  Disruptive Technology Reconsidered: A Critique and Research Agenda , 2004 .

[20]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[21]  David J. Miller,et al.  An asymmetry‐based view of advantage: towards an attainable sustainability , 2003 .

[22]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[23]  Erwin Danneels.  Tight–loose coupling with customers: the enactment of customer orientation , 2003 .

[24]  Sydney Finkelstein,et al.  Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better , 2003 .

[25]  R. Henderson,et al.  Discontinuities and senior management: assessing the role of recognition in pharmaceutical firm response to biotechnology , 2003 .

[26]  Jerker Denrell,et al.  Vicarious Learning, Undersampling of Failure, and the Myths of Management , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[27]  Erwin Danneels.  The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[28]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Alliance capability, stock market response, and long‐term alliance success: the role of the alliance function , 2002 .

[29]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances , 2001 .

[30]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  Product innovativeness from the firm's perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance , 2001 .

[31]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  How Organizational Resources Affect Strategic Change and Performance in Turbulent Environments , 2001 .

[32]  Richard R. Klink,et al.  Threats to the External Validity of Brand Extension Research , 2001 .

[33]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[34]  J. E. Butler,et al.  Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: f , 2001 .

[35]  J. Barney,et al.  IS THE RESOURCE-BASED " VIEW " A USEFUL PERSPECTIVE FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH ? , 2001 .

[36]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[37]  R. Rosenbloom.  Leadership, Capabilities, and Technological Change: The Transformation of NCR in the Electronic Era , 2000 .

[38]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[39]  P. N. Golder.  Historical Method in Marketing Research with New Evidence on Long-Term Market Share Stability , 2000 .

[40]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Strategizing Throughout the Organization: Managing Role Conflict in Strategic Renewal , 2000 .

[41]  T. Das,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2000 .

[42]  O. Williamson,et al.  STRATEGY RESEARCH: GOVERNANCE AND COMPETENCE PERSPECTIVES , 1999 .

[43]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  D. Sull.  The Dynamics of Standing Still: Firestone Tire & Rubber and the Radial Revolution , 1999, Business History Review.

[45]  Gianmario Verona.  A Resource-Based View of Product Development , 1999 .

[46]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  The Negative Impact of Extensions: Can Flagship Products be Diluted? , 1998 .

[47]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[48]  Kevin Lane Keller.  Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity , 1997 .

[49]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[50]  Kevin P. Coyne,et al.  Is your core competence a mirage , 1997 .

[51]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms , 1996 .

[52]  Allen C. Amason.  Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[53]  C. Baden‐Fuller,et al.  Rejuvenating the Mature Business , 1996 .

[54]  P. Herr,et al.  Impact of Dominance and Relatedness on Brand Extensions , 1996 .

[55]  J. Walsh.  Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane , 1995 .

[56]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[57]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  Defining and developing competence: A strategic process paradigm , 1995 .

[58]  David J. Collis,et al.  Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities? , 1994 .

[59]  Gerald F. Davis,et al.  The Decline and Fall of the Conglomerate Firm in the 1980s: The Deinstitutionalization of an Organizational Form , 1994 .

[60]  Robert A. Burgelman.  Fading Memories: A Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit in Dynamic Environments , 1994 .

[61]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[62]  P. Barr,et al.  Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal , 1992 .

[63]  David A. Aaker,et al.  The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions , 1992 .

[64]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Are More Good Things Better, or Will Technical and Market Capabilities Conflict When a Firm Expands? , 1992 .

[65]  Michael Burawoy,et al.  Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis , 1991 .

[66]  Robert A. Burgelman.  Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research , 1991 .

[67]  R. Grant.  The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[68]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[69]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions , 1990 .

[70]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[71]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[72]  K. Weick.  Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .

[73]  G. Day,et al.  Evolutionary Processes in Competitive Markets: Beyond the Product Life Cycle , 1989 .

[74]  C. Stubbart.  MANAGERIAL COGNITION: A MISSING LINK IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 1989 .

[75]  Grant Mccracken.  The long interview , 1988 .

[76]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[77]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[78]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[79]  E. Hirschman.  Humanistic Inquiry in Marketing Research: Philosophy, Method, and Criteria , 1986 .

[80]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[81]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[82]  David J. Teece,et al.  Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm , 1982 .

[83]  George S. Day,et al.  The Product Life Cycle: Analysis and Applications Issues , 1981 .

[84]  T. Jick.  Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[85]  Wilfred Beeching.  Century of the Typewriter , 1974 .

[86]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .