Situation awareness based on eye movements in relation to the task environment

The topic of situation awareness has received continuing interest over the last decades. Freeze-probe methods, such as the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT), are commonly employed for measuring situation awareness. The aim of this paper was to review validity issues of the SAGAT and examine whether eye movements are a promising alternative for measuring situation awareness. First, we outlined six problems of freeze-probe methods, such as the fact that freeze-probe methods rely on what the operator has been able to remember and then explicitly recall. We propose an operationalization of situation awareness based on the eye movements of the person in relation to their task environment to circumvent shortfalls of memory mediation and task interruption. Next, we analyzed experimental data in which participants (N = 86) were tasked to observe a display of six dials for about 10 min, and press the space bar if a dial pointer crossed a threshold value. Every 90 s, the screen was blanked and participants had to report the state of the dials on a paper sheet. We assessed correlations of participants’ task performance (% of threshold crossing detected) with visual sampling scores (% of dials glanced at during threshold crossings) and freeze-probe scores. Results showed that the visual-sampling score correlated with task performance at the threshold-crossing level (r = 0.31) and at the individual level (r = 0.78). Freeze-probe scores were low and showed weak associations with task performance. We conclude that the outlined limitations of the SAGAT impede measurement of situation awareness, which can be computed more effectively from eye movement measurements in relation to the state of the task environment. The present findings have practical value, as advances in eye-tracking cameras and ubiquitous computing lessen the need for interruptive tests such as SAGAT. Eye-based situation awareness is a predictor of performance, with the advantage that it is applicable through real-time feedback technologies.

[1]  Aimee K Gardner,et al.  Examining the Feasibility and Predictive Validity of the SAGAT Tool to Assess Situation Awareness Among Medical Trainees , 2016, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[2]  Frédéric Vanderhaegen,et al.  Can dissonance engineering improve risk analysis of human–machine systems? , 2017, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[3]  John D. Lee,et al.  Fifty Years of Driving Safety Research , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[4]  U. Neisser Cognitive Psychology. (Book Reviews: Cognition and Reality. Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology) , 1976 .

[5]  Aimee K. Gardner,et al.  Examining the feasibility and predictive validity of the SAGAT tool to assess situational awareness among surgical trainees , 2015 .

[6]  D. Boone,et al.  Use of human patient simulation and the situation awareness global assessment technique in practical trauma skills assessment. , 2006, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Explicit or implicit situation awareness? Measuring the situation awareness of train traffic controllers , 2016 .

[8]  George Mason Situation Awareness, Mental Workload, and Trust in Automation:Viable, Empirically Supported Cognitive Engineering Constructs , 2011 .

[9]  D O'Hare,et al.  Situational awareness ability and cognitive skills training in a complex real-world task , 2007, Ergonomics.

[10]  John W. Senders,et al.  Visual Sampling Processes , 1984 .

[11]  P A Hancock,et al.  Automation: how much is too much? , 2014, Ergonomics.

[12]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Situation Awareness , 2006 .

[14]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[15]  David Shinar,et al.  How Automatic Is Manual Gear Shifting? , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[16]  Alois Ferscha,et al.  Intelligent Vehicle Handling: Steering and Body Postures While Cornering , 2008, ARCS.

[17]  F. McKenna,et al.  Drivers' hazard perception ability: Situation awareness on the road , 2004 .

[18]  Kim-Phuong L. Vu,et al.  A Situated Approach to the Understanding of Dynamic Situations , 2015 .

[19]  Leo Gugerty,et al.  Development of a Novel Measure of Situation Awareness: The Case for Eye Movement Analysis , 2010 .

[20]  Mai-Britt Herslund,et al.  Looked-but-failed-to-see-errors in traffic. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  G.E. Moore,et al.  Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[22]  John M. Flach,et al.  Situation Awareness: Proceed with Caution , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[23]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Attention-Situation Awareness (A-SA) Model , 2003 .

[24]  Yke Bauke Eisma,et al.  Visual Sampling Processes Revisited: Replicating and Extending Senders (1983) Using Modern Eye-Tracking Equipment , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[25]  Keiichi Uchimura,et al.  Driver inattention monitoring system for intelligent vehicles: A review , 2009 .

[26]  L. Sechrest Incremental Validity : a Recommendation , 1963 .

[27]  Sidney W. A. Dekker,et al.  The danger of losing situation awareness , 2015, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[28]  Tao Deng,et al.  Where Does the Driver Look? Top-Down-Based Saliency Detection in a Traffic Driving Environment , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[29]  Kip Smith,et al.  Situation Awareness Is Adaptive, Externally Directed Consciousness , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[30]  Danko Nikolić,et al.  SITUATION AWARENESS AS A PREDICTOR OF PERFORMANCE IN EN ROUTE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS , 1998 .

[31]  Richard J. Hanowski,et al.  Assessment of a Drowsy Driver Warning System for Heavy Vehicle Drivers: Final Report , 2009 .

[32]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Developing Operator Capacity Estimates for Supervisory Control of Autonomous Vehicles , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[33]  Shayne Loft,et al.  Situation Awareness Measures for Simulated Submarine Track Management , 2015, Hum. Factors.

[34]  Frédéric Vanderhaegen,et al.  Situation awareness: Valid or fallacious? , 2015, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[35]  Stephanie M. Doane,et al.  Memory Processes of Flight Situation Awareness: Interactive Roles of Working Memory Capacity, Long-Term Working Memory, and Expertise , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[36]  Patrick Millot Situation Awareness: Is the glass half empty or half full? , 2015, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[37]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Situation Awareness , 2015 .

[38]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Attention-Situation Awareness (A-SA) Model of Pilot Error , 2007 .

[39]  Andrew R. Dattel,et al.  Does Situation Awareness Add to the Validity of Cognitive Tests? , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[40]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Measuring Situation Awareness in complex systems: Comparison of measures study , 2009 .

[41]  M. Sivak The Information That Drivers Use: Is it Indeed 90% Visual? , 1996, Perception.

[42]  Thomas Brox,et al.  Pixel-Level Encoding and Depth Layering for Instance-Level Semantic Labeling , 2016, GCPR.

[43]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Situation Awareness: Review of Mica Endsley's 1995 Articles on Situation Awareness Theory and Measurement , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[44]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Let the Reader Decide , 2015 .

[45]  Robert A. Wilson,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition: How to Situate Cognition , 2008 .

[46]  D. Kahneman Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[47]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Measurement of Team Situation Awareness in Low Experience Level Aviators , 2007 .

[48]  Kim-Phuong L. Vu,et al.  Assessing the Situation Awareness of Pilots Engaged in Self Spacing , 2008 .

[49]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  Estimations in Driving , 2009 .

[50]  Edmund Donges,et al.  A Two-Level Model of Driver Steering Behavior , 1978 .

[51]  Simon Banbury,et al.  Interruption and Reorientation Effects of a Situation Awareness Probe on Driving Hazard Anticipation , 2004 .

[52]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Final Reflections , 2015 .

[53]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Direct Measurement of Situation Awareness: Validity and Use of SAGAT , 2000 .

[54]  T. Belfield,et al.  Words matter! , 2010, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.

[55]  Donald L. Fisher,et al.  Can Novice Drivers Recognize Foreshadowing Risks as Easily as Experienced Drivers , 2017 .

[56]  Neville Stanton,et al.  Situation awareness measurement: a review of applicability for C4i environments. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[57]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  Behavioral Development and Construct Validity: The Principle of Aggregation , 1983 .

[59]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Theoretical Underpinnings of Situation Awareness, A Critical Review , 2000 .

[60]  N Moray,et al.  Fault management in process control: eye movements and action. , 1989, Ergonomics.

[61]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[62]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  How in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[63]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Vigilance Requires Hard Mental Work and Is Stressful , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[64]  Leo Gugerty Evidence from a Partial Report Task for Forgetting in Dynamic Spatial Memory , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[65]  L. Gugerty Situation Awareness During Driving: Explicit and Implicit Knowledge in Dynamic Spatial Memory , 1997 .

[66]  J. Kihlstrom,et al.  The Automaticity Juggernaut—or, Are We Automatons After All? , 2008 .

[67]  Heidi D. Howarth,et al.  An Evaluation of Emerging Driver Fatigue Detection Measures and Technologies , 2009 .

[68]  Benjamin A. Clegg,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Levels of Situation Awareness , 2013 .

[69]  Jonathan Evans In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[70]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  How can we support the commander's involvement in the planning process? An exploratory study into remote and co-located command planning , 2009 .

[71]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. , 2009 .

[72]  Richard van der Horst,et al.  Occlusion as a measure for visual workload: an overview of TNO occlusion research in car driving. , 2004 .

[73]  A. L. I︠A︡rbus Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .

[74]  Kim-Phuong L. Vu,et al.  COMPARING SITUATION AWARENESS MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES IN A LOW FIDELITY AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SIMULATION , 2008 .

[75]  Craig M. Harvey,et al.  A guide for assessing control room operator performance using speed and accuracy, perceived workload, situation awareness, and eye tracking , 2014 .

[76]  Jean Underwood,et al.  Driving Experience and Situation Awareness in Hazard Detection , 2013 .

[77]  Huy Le,et al.  Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[78]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement , 1988 .

[79]  Tracey Bucknall,et al.  Undergraduate nursing students' performance in recognising and responding to sudden patient deterioration in high psychological fidelity simulated environments: an Australian multi-centre study. , 2014, Nurse education today.

[80]  John W. Senders,et al.  The Human Operator as a Monitor and Controller of Multidegree of Freedom Systems , 1964 .

[81]  H.L.J. van der Maas,et al.  A dynamical model of general intelligence: the positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. , 2006, Psychological review.

[82]  David Crundall,et al.  Driving simulator validation with hazard perception , 2011 .

[83]  A. L. Yarbus,et al.  Eye Movements and Vision , 1967, Springer US.

[84]  Paul M. Fitts,et al.  Eye movements of aircraft pilots during instrument-landing approaches. , 1950 .

[85]  Jeff K Caird,et al.  The blind date: the effects of change blindness, passenger conversation and gender on looked-but-failed-to-see (LBFTS) errors. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[86]  M. Endsley Situation Awareness Misconceptions and Misunderstandings , 2015 .

[87]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  State-of-science: situation awareness in individuals, teams and systems , 2017, Ergonomics.

[88]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams , 2008 .

[89]  Maurice Merleau-Ponty Phenomenology of Perception , 1964 .

[90]  B. Sparrow,et al.  Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips , 2011, Science.